Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

HYMC vs EXK vs HL vs AG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
HYMC
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation

Gold

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.55B
5Y Perf.-69.3%
EXK
Endeavour Silver Corp.

Other Precious Metals

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$2.99B
5Y Perf.+428.6%
HL
Hecla Mining Company

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.13B
5Y Perf.+444.8%
AG
First Majestic Silver Corp.

Silver

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$10.55B
5Y Perf.+113.5%

HYMC vs EXK vs HL vs AG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
HYMC logoHYMC
EXK logoEXK
HL logoHL
AG logoAG
IndustryGoldOther Precious MetalsGoldSilver
Market Cap$3.55B$2.99B$12.13B$10.55B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$330M$1.57B$1.27B
Net Income (TTM)$-77M$-94M$559M$174M
Gross Margin9.3%50.9%35.5%
Operating Margin-1.7%44.1%29.0%
Forward P/E14.3x19.1x20.4x
Total Debt$0.00$120M$299M$314M
Cash & Equiv.$182M$106M$242M$792M

HYMC vs EXK vs HL vs AGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

HYMC
EXK
HL
AG
StockMay 20May 26Return
Hycroft Mining Hold… (HYMC)10030.7-69.3%
Endeavour Silver Co… (EXK)100528.6+428.6%
Hecla Mining Company (HL)100544.8+444.8%
First Majestic Silv… (AG)100213.5+113.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: HYMC vs EXK vs HL vs AG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HYMC and HL are tied at the top with 2 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Hecla Mining Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. AG and EXK also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
HYMC
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
The Defensive Pick

HYMC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.21, current ratio 23.86x
  • Beta 1.21, current ratio 23.86x
  • Beta 1.21 vs EXK's 1.71
  • +10.5% vs EXK's +193.4%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
EXK
Endeavour Silver Corp.
The Value Play

EXK is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (14.3x vs 19.1x)
Best for: value
HL
Hecla Mining Company
The Long-Run Compounder

HL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 360.6% 10Y total return vs EXK's 182.7%
  • 35.6% margin vs EXK's -28.4%
  • 16.3% ROA vs HYMC's -33.4%, ROIC 15.3% vs -90.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
AG
First Majestic Silver Corp.
The Income Pick

AG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.56, yield 0.1%
  • Rev growth 128.2%, EPS growth 202.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.8%
  • 128.2% revenue growth vs HYMC's -51.1%
  • 0.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HL's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAG logoAG128.2% revenue growth vs HYMC's -51.1%
ValueEXK logoEXKLower P/E (14.3x vs 19.1x)
Quality / MarginsHL logoHL35.6% margin vs EXK's -28.4%
Stability / SafetyHYMC logoHYMCBeta 1.21 vs EXK's 1.71
DividendsAG logoAG0.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HL's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)HYMC logoHYMC+10.5% vs EXK's +193.4%
Efficiency (ROA)HL logoHL16.3% ROA vs HYMC's -33.4%, ROIC 15.3% vs -90.1%

HYMC vs EXK vs HL vs AG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

HYMCHycroft Mining Holding Corporation
FY 2022
Gold
97.1%$32M
Silver
2.9%$980,000
EXKEndeavour Silver Corp.
FY 2024
Concentrate Sales
101.1%$71M
Provisional Pricing Adjustments
-1.1%$-776,000
HLHecla Mining Company
FY 2024
Silver Contracts
43.5%$414M
Gold
33.5%$318M
Zinc
13.8%$131M
Lead
9.2%$87M
Copper
0.0%$416,000
AGFirst Majestic Silver Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

HYMC vs EXK vs HL vs AG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHLLAGGINGEXK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

HL and HYMC operate at a comparable scale, with $1.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. HL is the more profitable business, keeping 35.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EXK's -28.4%. On growth, AG holds the edge at +171.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricHYMC logoHYMCHycroft Mining Ho…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…AG logoAGFirst Majestic Si…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$330M$1.6B$1.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$83M$49M$853M$636M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$77M-$94M$559M$174M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$105M-$129M$472M$351M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+9.3%+50.9%+35.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-1.7%+44.1%+29.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-28.4%+35.6%+13.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-39.1%+30.0%+27.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+154.0%+57.4%+171.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-14.9%-97.5%-160.0%+4.8%
HL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 36.9x trailing earnings, HL trades at a 40% valuation discount to AG's 61.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AG's 15.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EXK's 76.0x.

MetricHYMC logoHYMCHycroft Mining Ho…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…AG logoAGFirst Majestic Si…
Market CapShares × price$3.6B$3.0B$12.1B$10.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.4B$3.0B$12.2B$10.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-41.36x-78.08x36.92x61.06x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.34x19.07x20.39x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.34x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple76.02x17.25x15.82x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue13.72x8.53x8.25x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share7.87x5.07x4.58x3.27x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF39.11x30.01x
AG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

HL delivers a 22.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-66 for HYMC. AG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXK's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HL scores 8/9 vs HYMC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricHYMC logoHYMCHycroft Mining Ho…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…AG logoAGFirst Majestic Si…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-65.7%-18.4%+22.5%+5.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-33.4%-9.2%+16.3%+4.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-90.1%+1.5%+15.3%+13.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-22.8%+1.6%+16.8%+11.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92487
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.25x0.12x0.10x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$182M$14M$57M-$478M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$182M$106M$242M$792M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$120M$299M$314M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-9.35x-39.17x19.04x20.24x
HL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HYMC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HL five years ago would be worth $25,033 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,720 for HYMC. Over the past 12 months, HYMC leads with a +1046.9% total return vs EXK's +193.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HYMC at 111.3% vs EXK's 34.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricHYMC logoHYMCHycroft Mining Ho…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…AG logoAGFirst Majestic Si…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+59.3%+12.5%-4.1%+33.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+1046.9%+193.4%+271.0%+241.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+843.7%+144.0%+194.9%+212.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-2.8%+61.1%+150.3%+31.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-59.5%+182.7%+360.6%+128.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+111.3%+34.6%+43.4%+46.3%
HYMC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — HYMC and EXK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HYMC is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EXK's 1.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EXK currently trades 67.0% from its 52-week high vs HL's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricHYMC logoHYMCHycroft Mining Ho…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…AG logoAGFirst Majestic Si…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.21x1.71x1.26x1.56x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$58.73$15.15$34.17$32.03
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.71$3.14$4.68$5.49
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+66.2%+67.0%+52.9%+66.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.547.646.652.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.0M9.4M15.4M16.9M
Evenly matched — HYMC and EXK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

AG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: HYMC as "Hold", EXK as "Buy", HL as "Hold", AG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 31.7% upside for HL (target: $24) vs 24.0% for AG (target: $27).

MetricHYMC logoHYMCHycroft Mining Ho…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…AG logoAGFirst Majestic Si…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$12.75$23.83$26.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts1142611
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.1%+0.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises001
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01$0.02
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.0%+0.1%
AG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

HL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallHecla Mining Company (HL)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

HYMC vs EXK vs HL vs AG: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is HYMC or EXK or HL or AG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, First Majestic Silver Corp.

(AG) is the stronger pick with 128. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). Hecla Mining Company (HL) offers the better valuation at 36. 9x trailing P/E (19. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — HYMC or EXK or HL or AG?

On trailing P/E, Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the cheapest at 36.

9x versus First Majestic Silver Corp. at 61. 1x. On forward P/E, Endeavour Silver Corp. is actually cheaper at 14. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — HYMC or EXK or HL or AG?

Over the past 5 years, Hecla Mining Company (HL) delivered a total return of +150.

3%, compared to -2. 8% for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HL returned +360. 6% versus HYMC's -59. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — HYMC or EXK or HL or AG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

21β versus Endeavour Silver Corp. 's 1. 71β — meaning EXK is approximately 41% more volatile than HYMC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 25% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — HYMC or EXK or HL or AG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Majestic Silver Corp.

(AG) is pulling ahead at 128. 2% versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to -519. 4% for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AG leads at 26. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — HYMC or EXK or HL or AG?

Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the more profitable company, earning 22.

6% net margin versus -14. 5% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — meaning it keeps 22. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HL leads at 37. 5% versus 0. 0% for HYMC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HL leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is HYMC or EXK or HL or AG more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Endeavour Silver Corp.

(EXK) trades at 14. 3x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for First Majestic Silver Corp. — 6. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HL: 31. 7% to $23. 83.

08

Which pays a better dividend — HYMC or EXK or HL or AG?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is HYMC or EXK or HL or AG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

26), +360. 6% 10Y return). Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK) carries a higher beta of 1. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HL: +360. 6%, EXK: +182. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between HYMC and EXK and HL and AG?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: HYMC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EXK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

HYMC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EXK

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 77%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 28%
  • Net Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AG

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 85%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.