Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) vs Carvana Co. (CVNA) vs Genuine Parts Company (GPC) vs Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (AAP) vs CarParts.com, Inc. (PRTS) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CVNA | 48.6% revenue growth vs PRTS's -12.9% |
| Value | GPC | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | CVNA | 3.4% net margin vs PRTS's -9.7% |
| Stability / Safety | GPC | Beta 0.62 vs CVNA's 2.41 |
| Dividends | GPC | 3.4% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs AAP's 1.9% |
| Momentum (1Y) | AAP | +46.8% vs PRTS's -26.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CVNA | 6.4% ROA vs PRTS's -27.1%, ROIC 34.3% vs -32.1% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
MarineMax is the largest recreational boat and yacht retailer in the United States, operating dealerships that sell new and used boats while providing related services. The company generates revenue primarily from boat sales—both new and used—which account for roughly 80% of sales, supplemented by parts/accessories, service/repair, and brokerage/charter services. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive dealership network—the largest in the industry—which provides geographic reach, brand partnerships, and service capabilities that smaller regional players cannot match.
Carvana is an online-only used car retailer that sells vehicles directly to consumers through its e-commerce platform. It makes money primarily from vehicle sales — which account for over 90% of revenue — with additional income from financing, warranty products, and vehicle service contracts. Its key advantage is a vertically integrated model that controls the entire customer experience, from acquisition to reconditioning to delivery, bypassing traditional dealership infrastructure.
Genuine Parts Company is a leading distributor of automotive and industrial replacement parts through its extensive North American network. It generates revenue primarily from automotive parts distribution (~70% of sales) and industrial parts distribution (~30%), serving both professional repair shops and industrial maintenance customers. The company's competitive advantage lies in its massive scale, dense distribution network, and long-standing relationships with suppliers and customers that create significant barriers to entry.
Advance Auto Parts is a specialty retailer of automotive aftermarket parts and accessories for both professional installers and do-it-yourself customers. It generates revenue primarily through retail store sales — with professional/commercial sales representing about 60% of revenue and DIY retail making up the remaining 40% — supplemented by e-commerce. The company's competitive advantage lies in its extensive physical store network — over 4,700 locations across North America — which provides convenient access and local market penetration that pure online competitors cannot match.
CarParts.com is an online retailer of aftermarket auto parts and accessories serving individual consumers and repair shops. It generates revenue primarily through direct e-commerce sales — about 90% from individual consumers and 10% from wholesale to repair shops — via its network of websites and online marketplaces. The company's key advantage is its vertically integrated supply chain and proprietary technology platform that enables fast fulfillment and competitive pricing.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 5 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
CVNA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). GPC leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
GPC is the larger business by revenue, generating $24.3B annually — 43.3x PRTS's $561M. CVNA is the more profitable business, keeping 3.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRTS's -9.7%. On growth, CVNA holds the edge at +54.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | HZOMarineMax, Inc. | CVNACarvana Co. | GPCGenuine Parts Com… | AAPAdvance Auto Part… | PRTSCarParts.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.3B | $18.3B | $24.3B | $8.6B | $561M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $81M | $2.0B | $1.7B | $433M | -$31M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$32M | $629M | $66M | $44M | -$54M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | $546M | $421M | -$298M | -$33M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.5% | +20.7% | +36.1% | +43.2% | +32.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +9.5% | +4.7% | +1.9% | -9.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.4% | +3.4% | +0.3% | +0.5% | -9.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +3.0% | +1.7% | -3.5% | -6.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.9% | +54.5% | +4.1% | -1.2% | -11.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -123.4% | +60.9% | -5.6% | +101.4% | -11.8% |
Valuation Metrics
At 39.5x trailing earnings, CVNA trades at a 84% valuation discount to GPC's 253.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HZO's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GPC's 13.9x.
| Metric | HZOMarineMax, Inc. | CVNACarvana Co. | GPCGenuine Parts Com… | AAPAdvance Auto Part… | PRTSCarParts.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $667M | $25.4B | $16.6B | $3.2B | $49M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $23.7B | $24.4B | $5.3B | $54M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -21.33x | 39.55x | 253.74x | 72.84x | -1.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 40.12x | 45.43x | 15.26x | 19.56x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.44x | 12.62x | 13.91x | 12.22x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.29x | 1.25x | 0.68x | 0.37x | 0.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.71x | 17.83x | 3.74x | 1.47x | 0.48x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 55.85x | 28.61x | 39.41x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CVNA delivers a 21.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-85 for PRTS. CVNA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAP's 2.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CVNA scores 6/9 vs PRTS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | HZOMarineMax, Inc. | CVNACarvana Co. | GPCGenuine Parts Com… | AAPAdvance Auto Part… | PRTSCarParts.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.3% | +21.3% | +1.5% | +2.0% | -84.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.3% | +6.4% | +0.3% | +0.4% | -27.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.8% | +34.3% | +8.3% | +2.9% | -32.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | +20.0% | +11.2% | +2.3% | -30.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.31x | 0.15x | 1.86x | 2.38x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | -$1.7B | $7.8B | $2.1B | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $170M | $2.3B | $477M | $3.1B | $36M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $633M | $8.3B | $5.2B | $41M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.09x | 2.98x | 6.41x | 1.16x | -35.10x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in GPC five years ago would be worth $12,743 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $370 for PRTS. Over the past 12 months, AAP leads with a +46.8% total return vs PRTS's -26.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVNA at 2.3% vs PRTS's -51.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | HZOMarineMax, Inc. | CVNACarvana Co. | GPCGenuine Parts Com… | AAPAdvance Auto Part… | PRTSCarParts.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.7% | -16.5% | -3.8% | +37.4% | +42.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.3% | +43.4% | -1.2% | +46.8% | -26.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.2% | +3447.3% | -25.8% | -60.4% | -88.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.4% | +7.1% | +27.4% | -59.0% | -96.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.9% | +2910.5% | +69.1% | -53.9% | -74.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.2% | +2.3% | -9.5% | -26.6% | -51.6% |
Risk & Volatility
GPC is the less volatile stock with a 0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVNA's 2.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HZO currently trades 96.5% from its 52-week high vs PRTS's 52.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | HZOMarineMax, Inc. | CVNACarvana Co. | GPCGenuine Parts Com… | AAPAdvance Auto Part… | PRTSCarParts.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.68x | 2.41x | 0.62x | 1.01x | 1.41x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.60 | $486.89 | $151.57 | $70.00 | $1.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.85 | $148.25 | $104.01 | $28.89 | $0.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.5% | +68.6% | +78.7% | +76.0% | +52.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.9 | 42.8 | 29.3 | 48.8 | 70.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 334K | 3.4M | 942K | 1.8M | 827K |
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HZO as "Buy", CVNA as "Buy", GPC as "Hold", AAP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 39.3% upside for CVNA (target: $465) vs 1.6% for HZO (target: $31). For income investors, GPC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.40% vs AAP's 1.86%.
| Metric | HZOMarineMax, Inc. | CVNACarvana Co. | GPCGenuine Parts Com… | AAPAdvance Auto Part… | PRTSCarParts.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.00 | $465.33 | $141.75 | $56.40 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 44 | 22 | 44 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.4% | +1.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 37 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $4.05 | $0.99 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | +0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) | 100 | 182.93 | +82.9% |
| Carvana Co. (CVNA) | 100 | 495.25 | +395.3% |
| Genuine Parts Compa… (GPC) | 100 | 158.65 | +58.6% |
| Advance Auto Parts,… (AAP) | 100 | 36.63 | -63.4% |
| CarParts.com, Inc. (PRTS) | 100 | 20.08 | -79.9% |
Genuine Parts Compa… (GPC) returned +27% over 5 years vs CarParts.com, Inc. (PRTS)'s -96%. A $10,000 investment in GPC 5 years ago would be worth $12,743 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) | $942M | $2.3B | +145.1% |
| Carvana Co. (CVNA) | $365M | $20.3B | +5465.4% |
| Genuine Parts Compa… (GPC) | $15.3B | $24.3B | +58.4% |
| Advance Auto Parts,… (AAP) | $9.6B | $8.6B | -10.1% |
| CarParts.com, Inc. (PRTS) | $304M | $589M | +94.0% |
MarineMax, Inc.'s revenue grew from $942M (2016) to $2.3B (2025) — a 10.5% CAGR. Carvana Co.'s revenue grew from $365M (2016) to $20.3B (2025) — a 56.3% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) | 2.4% | -1.4% | -157.1% |
| Carvana Co. (CVNA) | -2.8% | 6.9% | +349.1% |
| Genuine Parts Compa… (GPC) | 4.5% | 0.3% | -93.9% |
| Advance Auto Parts,… (AAP) | 4.8% | 0.5% | -89.4% |
| CarParts.com, Inc. (PRTS) | 0.2% | -6.9% | -2963.4% |
MarineMax, Inc.'s net margin went from 2% (2016) to -1% (2025). Carvana Co.'s net margin went from -3% (2016) to 7% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) | 19.9 | 17.5 | -12.1% |
| Carvana Co. (CVNA) | 70.6 | 49.9 | -29.3% |
| Genuine Parts Compa… (GPC) | 22.7 | 261.6 | +1052.4% |
| Advance Auto Parts,… (AAP) | 15.5 | 53.8 | +247.1% |
MarineMax, Inc. has traded in a 4x–20x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~-21x. Carvana Co. has traded in a 50x–128x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~40x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) | 0.91 | -1.43 | -257.1% |
| Carvana Co. (CVNA) | -0.68 | 8.45 | +1342.6% |
| Genuine Parts Compa… (GPC) | 4.59 | 0.47 | -89.8% |
| Advance Auto Parts,… (AAP) | 6.2 | 0.73 | -88.2% |
| CarParts.com, Inc. (PRTS) | -0.08 | -0.71 | -787.5% |
MarineMax, Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.91 (2016) to $-1.43 (2025) — a NaN% CAGR. Carvana Co.'s EPS grew from $-0.68 (2016) to $8.45 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
MarineMax, Inc. generated $12M FCF in 2025 (-97% vs 2021). Carvana Co. generated $889M FCF in 2025 (+128% vs 2021).
HZO vs CVNA vs GPC vs AAP vs PRTS: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HZO or CVNA or GPC or AAP or PRTS a better buy right now?
Carvana Co. (CVNA) offers the better valuation at 39.5x trailing P/E (45.4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HZO or CVNA or GPC or AAP or PRTS?
On trailing P/E, Carvana Co. (CVNA) is the cheapest at 39.5x versus Genuine Parts Company at 253.7x. On forward P/E, Genuine Parts Company is actually cheaper at 15.3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HZO or CVNA or GPC or AAP or PRTS?
Over the past 5 years, Genuine Parts Company (GPC) delivered a total return of +27.4%, compared to -96.3% for CarParts.com, Inc. (PRTS). A $10,000 investment in GPC five years ago would be worth approximately $13K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CVNA returned +29.1% versus PRTS's -74.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HZO or CVNA or GPC or AAP or PRTS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Genuine Parts Company (GPC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.62β versus Carvana Co.'s 2.41β — meaning CVNA is approximately 291% more volatile than GPC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Carvana Co. (CVNA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 2% for Advance Auto Parts, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — HZO or CVNA or GPC or AAP or PRTS?
Carvana Co. (CVNA) is the more profitable company, earning 6.9% net margin versus -6.9% for CarParts.com, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVNA leads at 9.3% versus -6.9% for PRTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AAP leads at 43.7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is HZO or CVNA or GPC or AAP or PRTS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Genuine Parts Company (GPC) trades at 15.3x forward P/E versus 45.4x for Carvana Co. — 30.2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVNA: 39.3% to $465.33.
07Which pays a better dividend — HZO or CVNA or GPC or AAP or PRTS?
In this comparison, GPC (3.4% yield), AAP (1.9% yield) pay a dividend. HZO, CVNA, PRTS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is HZO or CVNA or GPC or AAP or PRTS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Genuine Parts Company (GPC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.62), 3.4% yield). Carvana Co. (CVNA) carries a higher beta of 2.41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GPC: +69.1%, CVNA: +29.1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between HZO and CVNA and GPC and AAP and PRTS?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: HZO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CVNA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GPC is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; AAP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. GPC, AAP pay a dividend while HZO, CVNA, PRTS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.