IBAC
IB Acquisition Corp. Common Stock
Shell Companies
Market Cap$171M
5Y Perf.+8.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
IBAC vs GS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Financial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$287.62B
5Y Perf.+105.1%
IBAC vs GS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | IBAC | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $171M | $287.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $126.85B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $16.67B |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 14.5% |
| Forward P/E | 90.3x | 15.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $616.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $823K | $182.09B |
IBAC vs GS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
IBAC
GS
| Stock | May 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| IB Acquisition Corp… (IBAC) | 100 | 108.6 | +8.6% |
| The Goldman Sachs G… (GS) | 100 | 205.1 | +105.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IBAC vs GS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: GS leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. IB Acquisition Corp. Common Stock is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
IBAC
IB Acquisition Corp. Common Stock
The Banking Pick
IBAC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.00
- Lower volatility, beta 0.00, current ratio 1.66x
- Beta 0.00, current ratio 1.66x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick
GS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 17.0%, EPS growth 77.3%
- 5.3% 10Y total return vs IBAC's 8.5%
- Lower P/E (15.8x vs 90.3x)
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | IBAC | 79.4% NII/revenue growth vs GS's 17.0% |
| Value | GS | Lower P/E (15.8x vs 90.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | GS | 11.3% margin vs IBAC's 2.5% |
| Stability / Safety | IBAC | Beta 0.00 vs GS's 1.47 |
| Dividends | GS | 1.5% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | GS | +70.6% vs IBAC's +4.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | IBAC | 2.9% ROA vs GS's 0.9%, ROIC -0.7% vs 1.9% |
IBAC vs GS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
IBAC vs GS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLGSLAGGINGIBAC
IBACIB Acquisition Corp. …
1leads
GSThe Goldman Sachs Gro…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs IBACMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
GS1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
GS5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
IBAC2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GS and IBAC operate at a comparable scale, with $126.9B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | IBACIB Acquisition Co… | GSThe Goldman Sachs… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $126.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$677,594 | $23.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $16.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | $15.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +41.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +14.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +11.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -12.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.3% | +45.8% |
GS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — IBAC and GS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.8x trailing earnings, GS trades at a 75% valuation discount to IBAC's 90.3x P/E.
| Metric | IBACIB Acquisition Co… | GSThe Goldman Sachs… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $171M | $287.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $170M | $722.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 90.25x | 22.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.63x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 34.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.43x | 2.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Evenly matched — IBAC and GS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — IBAC and GS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GS delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $3 for IBAC.
| Metric | IBACIB Acquisition Co… | GSThe Goldman Sachs… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.9% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.9% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.7% | +1.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.9% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 5.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$822,799 | $434.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $822,799 | $182.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $616.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.31x |
Evenly matched — IBAC and GS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GS five years ago would be worth $26,440 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,852 for IBAC. Over the past 12 months, GS leads with a +70.6% total return vs IBAC's +4.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GS at 43.5% vs IBAC's 2.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | IBACIB Acquisition Co… | GSThe Goldman Sachs… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.1% | +1.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.5% | +70.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.5% | +195.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.5% | +164.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.5% | +534.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.8% | +43.5% |
GS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBAC is the less volatile stock with a 0.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GS's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | IBACIB Acquisition Co… | GSThe Goldman Sachs… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.01x | 1.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.45 | $984.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.36 | $547.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.6% | +94.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.7 | 59.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 2.0M |
IBAC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
GS is the only dividend payer here at 1.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | IBACIB Acquisition Co… | GSThe Goldman Sachs… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $980.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $13.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.5% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
GS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). IBAC leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
Best OverallThe Goldman Sachs Group, In… (GS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
IBAC vs GS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IBAC or GS a better buy right now?
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) offers the better valuation at 22. 8x trailing P/E (15. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) a "Hold" — based on 55 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IBAC or GS?
On trailing P/E, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) is the cheapest at 22. 8x versus IB Acquisition Corp. Common Stock at 90. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IBAC or GS?
Over the past 5 years, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) delivered a total return of +164. 4%, compared to +8. 5% for IB Acquisition Corp. Common Stock (IBAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GS returned +541. 0% versus IBAC's +8. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IBAC or GS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IB Acquisition Corp.
Common Stock (IBAC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. 's 1. 47β — meaning GS is approximately 16760% more volatile than IBAC relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — IBAC or GS?
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 3% net margin versus 0. 0% for IB Acquisition Corp. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 11. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GS leads at 14. 5% versus 0. 0% for IBAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GS leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — IBAC or GS?
In this comparison, GS (1.
5% yield) pays a dividend. IBAC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is IBAC or GS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IB Acquisition Corp.
Common Stock (IBAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBAC: +8. 5%, GS: +541. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between IBAC and GS?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IBAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GS is a large-cap high-growth stock. GS pays a dividend while IBAC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
P/E Ratio<
x
(IBAC: 90.3x · GS: 22.8x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.