IBKR vs MS

For growth investors, Morgan Stanley (MS) is the stronger pick with 16.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 8% for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). Morgan Stanley (MS) offers the better valuation at 23. 8x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Morgan Stanley (MS) is the cheapest at 23.

8x versus Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. at 37. 8x. On forward P/E, Morgan Stanley is actually cheaper at 15. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. wins at 1. 13x versus Morgan Stanley's 1. 79x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.

(IBKR) delivered a total return of +384. 2%, compared to +144. 0% for Morgan Stanley (MS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBKR returned +828. 0% versus MS's +726. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Morgan Stanley (MS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

37β versus Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. 's 1. 93β — meaning IBKR is approximately 41% more volatile than MS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for Morgan Stanley — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Morgan Stanley (MS) is pulling ahead at 16.

8% versus 9. 8% for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Morgan Stanley grew EPS 53. 5% year-over-year, compared to 28. 3% for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Morgan Stanley (MS) is the more profitable company, earning 13.

0% net margin versus 9. 6% for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBKR leads at 86. 0% versus 17. 1% for MS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBKR leads at 89. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 13x versus Morgan Stanley's 1. 79x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Morgan Stanley (MS) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 33. 7x for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. — 17. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MS: 8. 7% to $205. 75.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Morgan Stanley (MS) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 0. 4% for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Morgan Stanley (MS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2.

0% yield, +726. 4% 10Y return). Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) carries a higher beta of 1. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MS: +726. 4%, IBKR: +828. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: IBKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MS is a large-cap high-growth stock. MS pays a dividend while IBKR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.