Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ICCC vs PCRX vs NEOG vs PAHC vs ELAN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
ICCC vs PCRX vs NEOG vs PAHC vs ELAN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $77M | $930M | $2.01B | $1.75B | $11.99B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $28M | $735M | $880M | $1.46B | $4.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $9M | $-603M | $92M | $-242M |
| Gross Margin | 40.9% | 60.2% | 38.0% | 31.9% | 49.4% |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | 3.4% | -2.0% | 11.6% | 9.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.6x | 25.9x | 14.2x | 23.3x |
| Total Debt | $15M | $454M | $913M | $762M | $4.02B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $159M | $129M | $68M | $545M |
ICCC vs PCRX vs NEOG vs PAHC vs ELAN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ImmuCell Corporation (ICCC) | 100 | 187.8 | +87.8% |
| Pacira BioSciences,… (PCRX) | 100 | 53.8 | -46.2% |
| Neogen Corporation (NEOG) | 100 | 26.0 | -74.0% |
| Phibro Animal Healt… (PAHC) | 100 | 164.7 | +64.7% |
| Elanco Animal Healt… (ELAN) | 100 | 112.1 | +12.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ICCC vs PCRX vs NEOG vs PAHC vs ELAN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ICCC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.42
- Rev growth 51.6%, EPS growth 65.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, Low D/E 54.9%, current ratio 3.41x
- Beta 0.42, current ratio 3.41x
PCRX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (8.6x vs 23.3x)
NEOG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PAHC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 128.6% 10Y total return vs ICCC's 22.2%
- 1.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +125.1% vs PCRX's -6.1%
- 6.7% ROA vs NEOG's -17.9%, ROIC 9.8% vs 0.2%
Among these 5 stocks, ELAN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.6% revenue growth vs NEOG's -3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.6x vs 23.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.4% margin vs NEOG's -68.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs NEOG's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +125.1% vs PCRX's -6.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.7% ROA vs NEOG's -17.9%, ROIC 9.8% vs 0.2% |
ICCC vs PCRX vs NEOG vs PAHC vs ELAN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ICCC vs PCRX vs NEOG vs PAHC vs ELAN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PAHC leads in 3 of 6 categories
PCRX leads 1 • ICCC leads 1 • NEOG leads 0 • ELAN leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAHC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ELAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.9B annually — 176.2x ICCC's $28M. ICCC is the more profitable business, keeping 8.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NEOG's -68.5%. On growth, PAHC holds the edge at +20.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $28M | $735M | $880M | $1.5B | $4.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $95M | $100M | $220M | $957M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $9M | -$603M | $92M | -$242M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $715,351 | $133M | $17M | $47M | $315M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.9% | +60.2% | +38.0% | +31.9% | +49.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +3.4% | -2.0% | +11.6% | +9.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +1.3% | -68.5% | +6.3% | -4.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +18.1% | +2.0% | +3.2% | +6.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.4% | +5.0% | -2.8% | +20.9% | +14.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +82.1% | -30.0% | +96.5% | +7.4% | -15.4% |
Valuation Metrics
PCRX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 36.3x trailing earnings, PAHC trades at a 75% valuation discount to PCRX's 147.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PCRX's 9.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ICCC's 84.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $77M | $930M | $2.0B | $1.7B | $12.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $88M | $1.2B | $2.8B | $2.4B | $15.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -32.58x | 147.75x | -1.84x | 36.27x | -51.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.61x | 25.87x | 14.23x | 23.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.85x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 84.01x | 9.86x | 20.70x | 15.65x | 16.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.89x | 1.28x | 2.25x | 1.35x | 2.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.51x | 1.54x | 0.97x | 6.15x | 1.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 6.80x | — | 41.82x | 42.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PAHC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PAHC delivers a 30.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-29 for NEOG. NEOG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PAHC's 2.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCRX scores 9/9 vs NEOG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.0% | +1.3% | -28.6% | +30.8% | -3.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.1% | +0.7% | -17.9% | +6.7% | -1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.1% | +2.3% | +0.2% | +9.8% | +1.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.1% | +2.8% | +0.2% | +12.0% | +2.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.55x | 0.66x | 0.44x | 2.67x | 0.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $11M | $296M | $784M | $694M | $3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $159M | $129M | $68M | $545M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $454M | $913M | $762M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.28x | 2.37x | -8.33x | 3.64x | -0.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PAHC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PAHC five years ago would be worth $16,597 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,940 for NEOG. Over the past 12 months, PAHC leads with a +125.1% total return vs PCRX's -6.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PAHC at 45.9% vs NEOG's -18.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +43.1% | -3.4% | +32.1% | +16.0% | +6.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +63.2% | -6.1% | +56.0% | +125.1% | +99.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.1% | -44.1% | -46.1% | +210.4% | +156.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.3% | -62.6% | -80.6% | +66.0% | -27.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.2% | -51.2% | -49.8% | +128.6% | -33.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.6% | -17.6% | -18.6% | +45.9% | +36.9% |
Risk & Volatility
ICCC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ICCC is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NEOG's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ICCC currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs PAHC's 71.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.42x | 0.47x | 1.83x | 1.38x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.08 | $27.64 | $11.43 | $60.08 | $27.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.52 | $18.80 | $4.53 | $19.00 | $10.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.3% | +85.5% | +80.9% | +71.8% | +86.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.5 | 45.9 | 46.2 | 60.3 | 68.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20K | 695K | 2.5M | 302K | 4.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PCRX as "Hold", NEOG as "Hold", PAHC as "Buy", ELAN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.8% upside for PCRX (target: $30) vs 13.5% for PAHC (target: $49). PAHC is the only dividend payer here at 1.11% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.50 | $11.00 | $49.00 | $27.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 36 | 11 | 13 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.48 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +16.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PAHC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PCRX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
ICCC vs PCRX vs NEOG vs PAHC vs ELAN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ICCC or PCRX or NEOG or PAHC or ELAN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ImmuCell Corporation (ICCC) is the stronger pick with 51.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Neogen Corporation (NEOG). Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) offers the better valuation at 36. 3x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ICCC or PCRX or NEOG or PAHC or ELAN?
On trailing P/E, Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) is the cheapest at 36.
3x versus Pacira BioSciences, Inc. at 147. 8x. On forward P/E, Pacira BioSciences, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ICCC or PCRX or NEOG or PAHC or ELAN?
Over the past 5 years, Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) delivered a total return of +66.
0%, compared to -80. 6% for Neogen Corporation (NEOG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PAHC returned +128. 6% versus PCRX's -51. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ICCC or PCRX or NEOG or PAHC or ELAN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ImmuCell Corporation (ICCC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
42β versus Neogen Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning NEOG is approximately 330% more volatile than ICCC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Neogen Corporation (NEOG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 3% for Phibro Animal Health Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ICCC or PCRX or NEOG or PAHC or ELAN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ImmuCell Corporation (ICCC) is pulling ahead at 51.
6% versus -3. 2% for Neogen Corporation (NEOG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Phibro Animal Health Corporation grew EPS 1883% year-over-year, compared to -114. 6% for Neogen Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NEOG leads at 19. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ICCC or PCRX or NEOG or PAHC or ELAN?
Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
7% net margin versus -122. 1% for Neogen Corporation — meaning it keeps 3. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAHC leads at 8. 5% versus -6. 2% for ICCC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PCRX leads at 79. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ICCC or PCRX or NEOG or PAHC or ELAN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Pacira BioSciences, Inc.
(PCRX) trades at 8. 6x forward P/E versus 25. 9x for Neogen Corporation — 17. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PCRX: 24. 8% to $29. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — ICCC or PCRX or NEOG or PAHC or ELAN?
In this comparison, PAHC (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. ICCC, PCRX, NEOG, ELAN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ICCC or PCRX or NEOG or PAHC or ELAN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ImmuCell Corporation (ICCC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
42)). Neogen Corporation (NEOG) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICCC: +22. 2%, NEOG: -49. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ICCC and PCRX and NEOG and PAHC and ELAN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ICCC is a small-cap high-growth stock; PCRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NEOG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PAHC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ELAN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. PAHC pays a dividend while ICCC, PCRX, NEOG, ELAN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.