Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ICCM vs DBVT vs HALO vs ALKS vs ABBV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
ICCM vs DBVT vs HALO vs ALKS vs ABBV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $351M | $1505.91T | $8.49B | $7.23B | $397.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $0.00 | $1.51B | $1.56B | $61.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-16M | $-168M | $349M | $153M | $4.23B |
| Gross Margin | 36.5% | — | 76.9% | 65.4% | 70.2% |
| Operating Margin | -8.4% | — | 57.0% | 12.3% | 26.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 8.8x | 30.3x | 15.8x |
| Total Debt | $217K | $22M | $2.14B | $70M | $69.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $194M | $134M | $1.12B | $5.23B |
ICCM vs DBVT vs HALO vs ALKS vs ABBV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| IceCure Medical Ltd (ICCM) | 100 | 49.0 | -51.0% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 29.7 | -70.3% |
| Halozyme Therapeuti… (HALO) | 100 | 170.5 | +70.5% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 138.8 | +38.8% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 186.2 | +86.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ICCM vs DBVT vs HALO vs ALKS vs ABBV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ICCM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +406.8% vs ABBV's +23.7%
DBVT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HALO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 37.6%, EPS growth -25.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, current ratio 4.66x
- Beta 0.63, current ratio 4.66x
- 37.6% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
Among these 5 stocks, ALKS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ABBV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.17, yield 2.9%
- 336.5% 10Y total return vs HALO's 6.5%
- Beta 0.17 vs ICCM's 1.85
- 2.9% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.6% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.8x vs 15.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.1% margin vs ICCM's -441.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.17 vs ICCM's 1.85 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +406.8% vs ABBV's +23.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.7% ROA vs ICCM's -119.1%, ROIC 32.1% vs -135.6% |
ICCM vs DBVT vs HALO vs ALKS vs ABBV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ICCM vs DBVT vs HALO vs ALKS vs ABBV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HALO leads in 3 of 6 categories
ICCM leads 1 • ABBV leads 1 • DBVT leads 0 • ALKS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HALO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $61.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. HALO is the more profitable business, keeping 23.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ICCM's -4.4%. On growth, HALO holds the edge at +42.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $0 | $1.5B | $1.6B | $61.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$29M | -$112M | $961M | $212M | $24.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$16M | -$168M | $349M | $153M | $4.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | -$151M | $668M | $392M | $18.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.5% | — | +76.9% | +65.4% | +70.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.4% | — | +57.0% | +12.3% | +26.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | — | +23.1% | +9.8% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | — | +44.3% | +25.1% | +30.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.7% | — | +42.2% | +28.2% | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.6% | +91.5% | +31.2% | -4.1% | +57.4% |
Valuation Metrics
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 28.0x trailing earnings, HALO trades at a 71% valuation discount to ABBV's 94.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HALO's 11.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALKS's 22.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $351M | $1505.91T | $8.5B | $7.2B | $397.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $342M | $1505.91T | $10.5B | $6.2B | $461.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -21.75x | -0.67x | 27.97x | 30.34x | 94.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 8.83x | — | 15.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.22x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 11.61x | 21.99x | 16.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 103.91x | — | 6.08x | 4.90x | 6.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 36.67x | 0.58x | 181.74x | 4.02x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 13.18x | 15.05x | 22.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HALO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-2 for ICCM. ICCM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HALO's 43.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs ICCM's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | -130.2% | +126.3% | +8.8% | +62.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -119.1% | -89.0% | +14.7% | +5.4% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -135.6% | — | +32.1% | +18.9% | +23.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -187.2% | -145.7% | +38.2% | +14.2% | +21.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.13x | 43.89x | 0.04x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$9M | -$172M | $2.0B | -$1.0B | $63.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $194M | $134M | $1.1B | $5.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $217,000 | $22M | $2.1B | $70M | $69.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -313.68x | -189.82x | 44.97x | 32.30x | 3.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ICCM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $22,723 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,173 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, ICCM leads with a +406.8% total return vs ABBV's +23.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ICCM at 68.6% vs DBVT's -3.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +728.6% | -7.7% | +1.8% | +53.5% | -0.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +406.8% | +116.0% | +33.0% | +37.5% | +23.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +378.9% | -8.9% | +116.6% | +47.3% | +78.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.1% | -68.3% | +81.4% | +88.0% | +127.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.1% | -89.5% | +653.7% | -5.4% | +336.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +68.6% | -3.1% | +29.4% | +13.8% | +21.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALKS and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICCM's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs DBVT's 67.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.85x | 1.11x | 0.63x | 0.96x | 0.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.69 | $26.18 | $82.22 | $44.57 | $244.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.13 | $7.94 | $51.06 | $25.17 | $181.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.7% | +67.1% | +87.1% | +97.3% | +91.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 23.1 | 35.5 | 57.2 | 74.4 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 225K | 1.5M | 2.2M | 4.6M |
Analyst Outlook
ABBV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DBVT as "Buy", HALO as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 163.5% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 4.7% for HALO (target: $75). ABBV is the only dividend payer here at 2.92% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 | $75.00 | $46.00 | $257.54 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 27 | 28 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 0 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $6.57 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.0% | +0.4% | +0.2% |
HALO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ICCM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
ICCM vs DBVT vs HALO vs ALKS vs ABBV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ICCM or DBVT or HALO or ALKS or ABBV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the stronger pick with 37. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO) offers the better valuation at 28. 0x trailing P/E (8. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ICCM or DBVT or HALO or ALKS or ABBV?
On trailing P/E, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the cheapest at 28. 0x versus AbbVie Inc. at 94. 9x. On forward P/E, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ICCM or DBVT or HALO or ALKS or ABBV?
Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) delivered a total return of +127. 2%, compared to -68. 3% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HALO returned +653. 7% versus DBVT's -89. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ICCM or DBVT or HALO or ALKS or ABBV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 17β versus IceCure Medical Ltd's 1. 85β — meaning ICCM is approximately 980% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, IceCure Medical Ltd (ICCM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 44% for Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ICCM or DBVT or HALO or ALKS or ABBV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is pulling ahead at 37. 6% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IceCure Medical Ltd grew EPS 20. 0% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HALO leads at 28. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ICCM or DBVT or HALO or ALKS or ABBV?
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 7% net margin versus -445. 6% for IceCure Medical Ltd — meaning it keeps 22. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HALO leads at 58. 4% versus -446. 7% for ICCM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ICCM or DBVT or HALO or ALKS or ABBV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 15. 8x for AbbVie Inc. — 7. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 163. 5% to $46. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — ICCM or DBVT or HALO or ALKS or ABBV?
In this comparison, ABBV (2.
9% yield) pays a dividend. ICCM, DBVT, HALO, ALKS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ICCM or DBVT or HALO or ALKS or ABBV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 17), 2. 9% yield, +336. 5% 10Y return). IceCure Medical Ltd (ICCM) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +336. 5%, ICCM: -52. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ICCM and DBVT and HALO and ALKS and ABBV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ICCM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; HALO is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABBV is a large-cap quality compounder stock. ABBV pays a dividend while ICCM, DBVT, HALO, ALKS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.