Agricultural Inputs
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ICL vs CF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Inputs
ICL vs CF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Inputs | Agricultural Inputs |
| Market Cap | $7.25B | $18.39B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.05B | $7.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $369M | $1.76B |
| Gross Margin | 31.9% | 40.4% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 27.1% |
| Forward P/E | 14.6x | 8.5x |
| Total Debt | $2.76B | $3.95B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $291M | $1.98B |
ICL vs CF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ICL Group Ltd (ICL) | 100 | 162.4 | +62.4% |
| CF Industries Holdi… (CF) | 100 | 407.7 | +307.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ICL vs CF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ICL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 3.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 44.1%, current ratio 1.33x
- PEG 0.26 vs CF's 0.34
CF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.3%, EPS growth 33.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.1%
- 333.0% 10Y total return vs ICL's 86.6%
- 19.3% revenue growth vs ICL's 4.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.3% revenue growth vs ICL's 4.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.5x vs 14.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.7% margin vs ICL's 5.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (44.1% vs 50.8%) | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, vs CF's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +48.5% vs ICL's -15.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.4% ROA vs ICL's 3.0%, ROIC 18.7% vs 6.3% |
ICL vs CF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ICL vs CF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CF leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CF and ICL operate at a comparable scale, with $7.4B and $7.1B in trailing revenue. CF is the more profitable business, keeping 23.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ICL's 5.2%. On growth, CF holds the edge at +19.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.1B | $7.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | $2.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $369M | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $317M | $1.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.9% | +40.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +27.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | +23.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +21.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.7% | +19.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.0% | +115.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CF leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.3x trailing earnings, CF trades at a 57% valuation discount to ICL's 31.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CF offers better value at 0.31x vs ICL's 0.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.3B | $18.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.7B | $20.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.22x | 13.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.61x | 8.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.55x | 0.31x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.37x | 6.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.01x | 2.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.16x | 2.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 55.80x | 10.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CF leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CF delivers a 20.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $6 for ICL. ICL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CF's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CF scores 8/9 vs ICL's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.8% | +20.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +12.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.3% | +18.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.7% | +18.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.5B | $2.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $291M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.8B | $3.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.71x | 12.23x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CF leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CF five years ago would be worth $24,581 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,767 for ICL. Over the past 12 months, CF leads with a +48.5% total return vs ICL's -15.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CF at 22.9% vs ICL's 0.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.1% | +50.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -15.2% | +48.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.4% | +85.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.7% | +145.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.6% | +333.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.5% | +22.9% |
Risk & Volatility
CF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CF is the less volatile stock with a -0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICL's 0.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CF currently trades 84.3% from its 52-week high vs ICL's 76.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | -0.62x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.35 | $141.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.76 | $75.42 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.5% | +84.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.3 | 56.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 4.9M |
Analyst Outlook
ICL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ICL as "Hold" and CF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.4% upside for ICL (target: $6) vs -9.1% for CF (target: $109). For income investors, ICL offers the higher dividend yield at 3.09% vs CF's 1.68%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.15 | $108.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.17 | $2.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CF leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ICL leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook).
ICL vs CF: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ICL or CF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
(CF) is the stronger pick with 19. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 6% for ICL Group Ltd (ICL). CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ICL or CF?
On trailing P/E, CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
(CF) is the cheapest at 13. 3x versus ICL Group Ltd at 31. 2x. On forward P/E, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ICL Group Ltd wins at 0. 26x versus CF Industries Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 34x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ICL or CF?
Over the past 5 years, CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
(CF) delivered a total return of +145. 8%, compared to +7. 7% for ICL Group Ltd (ICL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CF returned +333. 0% versus ICL's +86. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ICL or CF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
(CF) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 62β versus ICL Group Ltd's 0. 65β — meaning ICL is approximately -205% more volatile than CF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ICL Group Ltd (ICL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 51% for CF Industries Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ICL or CF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
(CF) is pulling ahead at 19. 3% versus 4. 6% for ICL Group Ltd (ICL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CF Industries Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 33. 1% year-over-year, compared to -43. 8% for ICL Group Ltd. Over a 3-year CAGR, ICL leads at -10. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ICL or CF?
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
(CF) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 5% net margin versus 3. 2% for ICL Group Ltd — meaning it keeps 20. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CF leads at 33. 4% versus 9. 8% for ICL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CF leads at 38. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ICL or CF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ICL Group Ltd (ICL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus CF Industries Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 34x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) trades at 8. 5x forward P/E versus 14. 6x for ICL Group Ltd — 6. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICL: 9. 4% to $6. 15.
08Which pays a better dividend — ICL or CF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
ICL Group Ltd (ICL) offers the highest yield at 3. 1%, versus 1. 7% for CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF).
09Is ICL or CF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
(CF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 62), 1. 7% yield, +333. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CF: +333. 0%, ICL: +86. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ICL and CF?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ICL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CF is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.