Agricultural Inputs
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ICL vs IPI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Inputs
ICL vs IPI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Inputs | Agricultural Inputs |
| Market Cap | $7.25B | $506M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.05B | $299M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $369M | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 31.9% | 18.9% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 1.5% |
| Forward P/E | 14.6x | 39.5x |
| Total Debt | $2.76B | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $291M | $84M |
ICL vs IPI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ICL Group Ltd (ICL) | 100 | 162.4 | +62.4% |
| Intrepid Potash, In… (IPI) | 100 | 306.4 | +206.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ICL vs IPI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ICL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (14.6x vs 39.5x)
- 5.2% margin vs IPI's 4.7%
- 3.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
IPI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.12
- Rev growth 17.1%, EPS growth 105.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.0%
- 269.5% 10Y total return vs ICL's 86.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.1% revenue growth vs ICL's 4.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.6x vs 39.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.2% margin vs IPI's 4.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs ICL's 0.65, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -1.3% vs ICL's -15.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.0% ROA vs IPI's 2.2%, ROIC 6.3% vs 2.7% |
ICL vs IPI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ICL vs IPI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICL is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.1B annually — 23.6x IPI's $299M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.2% (ICL) to 4.7% (IPI). On growth, ICL holds the edge at +5.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.1B | $299M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | $37M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $369M | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $317M | $44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.9% | +18.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +1.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | +4.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +14.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.7% | +0.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.0% | -88.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ICL and IPI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 31.2x trailing earnings, ICL trades at a 30% valuation discount to IPI's 44.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IPI's 7.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ICL's 7.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.3B | $506M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.7B | $426M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.22x | 44.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.61x | 39.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.55x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.37x | 7.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.01x | 1.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.16x | 1.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 55.80x | 19.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IPI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ICL delivers a 5.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $3 for IPI. IPI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICL's 0.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IPI scores 7/9 vs ICL's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.8% | +2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.3% | +2.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.7% | +2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.5B | -$80M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $291M | $84M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.8B | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.71x | 105.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IPI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IPI five years ago would be worth $14,011 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,767 for ICL. Over the past 12 months, IPI leads with a -1.3% total return vs ICL's -15.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IPI at 23.2% vs ICL's 0.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.1% | +33.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -15.2% | -1.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.4% | +86.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.7% | +40.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.6% | +269.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.5% | +23.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ICL and IPI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IPI is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICL's 0.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.35 | $50.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.76 | $22.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.5% | +74.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.3 | 54.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 369K |
Analyst Outlook
IPI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ICL as "Hold" and IPI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.4% upside for ICL (target: $6) vs -36.3% for IPI (target: $24). ICL is the only dividend payer here at 3.09% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.15 | $24.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.17 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
IPI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ICL leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
ICL vs IPI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ICL or IPI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Intrepid Potash, Inc.
(IPI) is the stronger pick with 17. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 6% for ICL Group Ltd (ICL). ICL Group Ltd (ICL) offers the better valuation at 31. 2x trailing P/E (14. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ICL Group Ltd (ICL) a "Hold" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ICL or IPI?
On trailing P/E, ICL Group Ltd (ICL) is the cheapest at 31.
2x versus Intrepid Potash, Inc. at 44. 3x. On forward P/E, ICL Group Ltd is actually cheaper at 14. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ICL or IPI?
Over the past 5 years, Intrepid Potash, Inc.
(IPI) delivered a total return of +40. 1%, compared to +7. 7% for ICL Group Ltd (ICL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IPI returned +269. 5% versus ICL's +86. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ICL or IPI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intrepid Potash, Inc.
(IPI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus ICL Group Ltd's 0. 65β — meaning ICL is approximately 424% more volatile than IPI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intrepid Potash, Inc. (IPI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 44% for ICL Group Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ICL or IPI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intrepid Potash, Inc.
(IPI) is pulling ahead at 17. 1% versus 4. 6% for ICL Group Ltd (ICL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intrepid Potash, Inc. grew EPS 105. 1% year-over-year, compared to -43. 8% for ICL Group Ltd. Over a 3-year CAGR, IPI leads at -4. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ICL or IPI?
Intrepid Potash, Inc.
(IPI) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 7% net margin versus 3. 2% for ICL Group Ltd — meaning it keeps 3. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICL leads at 9. 8% versus 5. 2% for IPI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ICL leads at 30. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ICL or IPI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ICL Group Ltd (ICL) trades at 14.
6x forward P/E versus 39. 5x for Intrepid Potash, Inc. — 24. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICL: 9. 4% to $6. 15.
08Which pays a better dividend — ICL or IPI?
In this comparison, ICL (3.
1% yield) pays a dividend. IPI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ICL or IPI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intrepid Potash, Inc.
(IPI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), +269. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IPI: +269. 5%, ICL: +86. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ICL and IPI?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ICL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IPI is a small-cap high-growth stock. ICL pays a dividend while IPI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.