Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ICU vs DBVT vs IMVT vs ALKS vs ABBV

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ICU
SeaStar Medical Holding Corporation

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$29M
5Y Perf.-98.3%
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • FR
Market Cap$1712.35T
5Y Perf.+11.5%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.53B
5Y Perf.+418.6%
ALKS
Alkermes plc

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • IE
Market Cap$5.90B
5Y Perf.+56.7%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - General

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$358.42B
5Y Perf.+50.2%

ICU vs DBVT vs IMVT vs ALKS vs ABBV — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ICU logoICU
DBVT logoDBVT
IMVT logoIMVT
ALKS logoALKS
ABBV logoABBV
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyDrug Manufacturers - General
Market Cap$29M$1712.35T$5.53B$5.90B$358.42B
Revenue (TTM)$881K$0.00$0.00$1.56B$61.16B
Net Income (TTM)$-14M$-168M$-464M$153M$4.23B
Gross Margin95.3%65.4%70.2%
Operating Margin-15.8%12.3%26.7%
Forward P/E24.8x14.2x
Total Debt$574K$22M$98K$70M$69.07B
Cash & Equiv.$2M$194M$714M$1.12B$5.23B

ICU vs DBVT vs IMVT vs ALKS vs ABBVLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ICU
DBVT
IMVT
ALKS
ABBV
StockSep 22May 26Return
SeaStar Medical Hol… (ICU)1001.7-98.3%
DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT)100111.5+11.5%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100518.6+418.6%
Alkermes plc (ALKS)100156.7+56.7%
AbbVie Inc. (ABBV)100150.2+50.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ICU vs DBVT vs IMVT vs ALKS vs ABBV

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ABBV leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. SeaStar Medical Holding Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. ALKS also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ICU
SeaStar Medical Holding Corporation
The Growth Play

ICU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 12.0%, EPS growth 78.1%
  • 12.0% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
  • +291.9% vs ABBV's +11.3%
Best for: growth exposure
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.
The Healthcare Pick

DBVT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, IMVT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ALKS
Alkermes plc
The Defensive Pick

ALKS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 3.55x
  • 9.8% margin vs ICU's -15.5%
  • 5.4% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
The Income Pick

ABBV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 3.2%
  • 295.5% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 173.6%
  • Beta 0.34, yield 3.2%, current ratio 0.67x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthICU logoICU12.0% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
ValueABBV logoABBVBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsALKS logoALKS9.8% margin vs ICU's -15.5%
Stability / SafetyABBV logoABBVBeta 0.34 vs IMVT's 1.37
DividendsABBV logoABBV3.2% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ICU logoICU+291.9% vs ABBV's +11.3%
Efficiency (ROA)ALKS logoALKS5.4% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0%

ICU vs DBVT vs IMVT vs ALKS vs ABBV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ICUSeaStar Medical Holding Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

DBVTDBV Technologies S.A.

Segment breakdown not available.

IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ALKSAlkermes plc
FY 2025
Vivitrol
39.8%$468M
Aristada And Aristada Initio
31.5%$370M
Manufactured Product And Royalty
24.8%$291M
Manufacturing Revenue
3.9%$46M
ABBVAbbVie Inc.
FY 2025
SKYRIZI
30.2%$17.6B
RINVOQ
14.3%$8.3B
H U M I R A
7.8%$4.5B
Botox Therapeutic
6.5%$3.8B
Vraylar
6.2%$3.6B
Imbruvica
4.9%$2.9B
VENCLEXTA
4.8%$2.8B
Other (14)
25.3%$14.7B

ICU vs DBVT vs IMVT vs ALKS vs ABBV — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLABBVLAGGINGIMVT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ABBV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

ABBV and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $61.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALKS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ICU's -15.5%. On growth, ICU holds the edge at +169.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricICU logoICUSeaStar Medical H…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plcABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$881,000$0$0$1.6B$61.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$14M-$112M-$487M$212M$24.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$14M-$168M-$464M$153M$4.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$14M-$151M-$423M$392M$18.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+95.3%+65.4%+70.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-15.8%+12.3%+26.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-15.5%+9.8%+6.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-16.1%+25.1%+30.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+169.1%+28.2%+10.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+88.2%+91.5%+19.7%-4.1%+57.4%
ABBV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ALKS leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 24.8x trailing earnings, ALKS trades at a 71% valuation discount to ABBV's 85.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ABBV's 15.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALKS's 17.3x.

MetricICU logoICUSeaStar Medical H…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plcABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.
Market CapShares × price$29M$1712.35T$5.5B$5.9B$358.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$28M$1712.35T$4.8B$4.9B$422.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.73x-0.76x-9.97x24.76x85.50x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.17x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple17.25x14.96x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue215.18x4.00x5.86x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.66x5.83x3.28x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF12.28x20.12x
ALKS leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ALKS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DBVT's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricICU logoICUSeaStar Medical H…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plcABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-119.2%-130.2%-47.1%+8.8%+62.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-88.0%-89.0%-44.1%+5.4%+3.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+18.9%+23.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-145.7%-66.1%+14.2%+21.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–964276
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.13x0.00x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1M-$172M-$714M-$1.0B$63.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2M$194M$714M$1.1B$5.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$574,000$22M$98,000$70M$69.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-209.88x-189.82x32.30x3.28x
ALKS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $20,131 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $189 for ICU. Over the past 12 months, ICU leads with a +291.9% total return vs ABBV's +11.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ABBV at 14.6% vs ICU's -53.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricICU logoICUSeaStar Medical H…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plcABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+84.7%+4.9%+5.1%+25.3%-10.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+291.9%+110.4%+96.1%+16.5%+11.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.1%+19.7%+40.9%+14.5%+50.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.1%-69.1%+62.4%+60.9%+101.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.1%-87.0%+173.6%-11.0%+295.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-53.7%+6.2%+12.1%+4.6%+14.6%
ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ALKS and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMVT's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs DBVT's 76.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricICU logoICUSeaStar Medical H…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plcABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.14x1.26x1.36x1.00x0.28x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.08$26.18$30.09$36.60$244.81
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.22$7.53$13.36$25.17$176.57
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.6%+76.3%+90.5%+96.7%+82.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10065.748.160.260.246.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded150K252K1.4M2.3M5.8M
Evenly matched — ALKS and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ABBV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: DBVT as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 26.7% for ABBV (target: $257). ABBV is the only dividend payer here at 3.24% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricICU logoICUSeaStar Medical H…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ALKS logoALKSAlkermes plcABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$46.33$45.50$46.00$256.69
# AnalystsCovering analysts15232841
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0013
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$6.57
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.5%+0.3%
ABBV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

ABBV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ALKS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallAbbVie Inc. (ABBV)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ICU vs DBVT vs IMVT vs ALKS vs ABBV: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ICU or DBVT or IMVT or ALKS or ABBV a better buy right now?

For growth investors, AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) is the stronger pick with 8. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). Alkermes plc (ALKS) offers the better valuation at 24. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ICU or DBVT or IMVT or ALKS or ABBV?

On trailing P/E, Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the cheapest at 24.

8x versus AbbVie Inc. at 85. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ICU or DBVT or IMVT or ALKS or ABBV?

Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) delivered a total return of +101. 3%, compared to -98. 1% for SeaStar Medical Holding Corporation (ICU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABBV returned +293. 8% versus ICU's -98. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ICU or DBVT or IMVT or ALKS or ABBV?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Immunovant, Inc. 's 1. 36β — meaning IMVT is approximately 392% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 13% for DBV Technologies S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ICU or DBVT or IMVT or ALKS or ABBV?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) is pulling ahead at 8. 6% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SeaStar Medical Holding Corporation grew EPS 78. 1% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALKS leads at 9. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ICU or DBVT or IMVT or ALKS or ABBV?

Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the more profitable company, earning 16.

4% net margin versus -183. 9% for SeaStar Medical Holding Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus -132. 2% for ICU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ICU leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ICU or DBVT or IMVT or ALKS or ABBV more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131.

8% to $46. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ICU or DBVT or IMVT or ALKS or ABBV?

In this comparison, ABBV (3.

2% yield) pays a dividend. ICU, DBVT, IMVT, ALKS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ICU or DBVT or IMVT or ALKS or ABBV better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 3. 2% yield, +293. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +293. 8%, DBVT: -87. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ICU and DBVT and IMVT and ALKS and ABBV?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ICU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock. ABBV pays a dividend while ICU, DBVT, IMVT, ALKS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ICU

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 84%
  • Gross Margin > 57%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DBVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IMVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ALKS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ABBV

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.