IEP
Icahn Enterprises L.P.
Conglomerates
Market Cap$5.00B
5Y Perf.-83.3%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
IEP vs CVR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Market Cap$10M
5Y Perf.-46.3%
IEP vs CVR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | IEP | CVR |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories |
| Market Cap | $5.00B | $10M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.74B | $26M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-385M | $-4M |
| Gross Margin | 10.1% | 8.3% |
| Operating Margin | 1.6% | -14.7% |
| Forward P/E | 18.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $8.71B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4.34B | $2M |
IEP vs CVR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
IEP
CVR
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Icahn Enterprises L… (IEP) | 100 | 16.7 | -83.3% |
| Chicago Rivet & Mac… (CVR) | 100 | 53.7 | -46.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IEP vs CVR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: IEP leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
IEP
Icahn Enterprises L.P.
The Income Pick
IEP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 10.1%
- Rev growth -14.7%, EPS growth 46.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.1%
- 21.4% 10Y total return vs CVR's -27.2%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
The Growth Leader
CVR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- -14.3% revenue growth vs IEP's -14.7%
Best for: growth
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CVR | -14.3% revenue growth vs IEP's -14.7% |
| Quality / Margins | IEP | -4.0% margin vs CVR's -13.6% |
| Stability / Safety | IEP | Beta 0.60 vs CVR's 0.97 |
| Dividends | IEP | 10.1% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs CVR's 3.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | IEP | +16.6% vs CVR's -15.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | IEP | -2.6% ROA vs CVR's -14.7%, ROIC 1.1% vs -18.1% |
IEP vs CVR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2024
IEP vs CVR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLIEPLAGGINGCVR
CVRChicago Rivet & Machi…
1leads
IEPIcahn Enterprises L.P.
5leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CVRMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
IEP5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CVR2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
IEP5/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
IEP6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
IEP2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
IEP2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IEP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IEP is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.7B annually — 374.4x CVR's $26M. IEP is the more profitable business, keeping -4.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CVR's -13.6%. On growth, CVR holds the edge at +5.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | IEPIcahn Enterprises… | CVRChicago Rivet & M… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.7B | $26M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $689M | -$3M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$385M | -$4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | +8.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | -14.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | -13.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | -6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.7% | +5.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.6% | +104.7% |
IEP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CVR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | IEPIcahn Enterprises… | CVRChicago Rivet & M… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.0B | $10M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.4B | $8M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.86x | -1.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.93x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.14x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.49x | 0.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.84x | 0.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.06x | — |
CVR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IEP leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IEP delivers a -11.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-11 in annual profit, vs $-18 for CVR. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IEP scores 6/9 vs CVR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | IEPIcahn Enterprises… | CVRChicago Rivet & M… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.3% | -17.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.6% | -14.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.1% | -18.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.0% | -21.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.89x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.4B | -$2M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4.3B | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.7B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.03x | — |
IEP leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IEP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IEP five years ago would be worth $5,965 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,158 for CVR. Over the past 12 months, IEP leads with a +16.6% total return vs CVR's -15.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IEP at -21.7% vs CVR's -25.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | IEPIcahn Enterprises… | CVRChicago Rivet & M… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.0% | -24.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +16.6% | -15.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.9% | -58.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.3% | -48.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.4% | -27.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.7% | -25.3% |
IEP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IEP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IEP is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVR's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IEP currently trades 83.4% from its 52-week high vs CVR's 70.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | IEPIcahn Enterprises… | CVRChicago Rivet & M… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.99 | $15.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.08 | $8.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.4% | +70.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.8 | 46.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 931K | 3K |
IEP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
IEP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, IEP offers the higher dividend yield at 10.07% vs CVR's 3.13%.
| Metric | IEPIcahn Enterprises… | CVRChicago Rivet & M… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +10.1% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.84 | $0.33 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
IEP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
IEP leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CVR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallIcahn Enterprises L.P. (IEP)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
IEP vs CVR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IEP or CVR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
(CVR) is the stronger pick with -14. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 7% for Icahn Enterprises L. P. (IEP). Analysts rate Icahn Enterprises L. P. (IEP) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IEP or CVR?
Over the past 5 years, Icahn Enterprises L.
P. (IEP) delivered a total return of -40. 3%, compared to -48. 4% for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IEP returned +21. 4% versus CVR's -27. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IEP or CVR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Icahn Enterprises L.
P. (IEP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. 's 0. 97β — meaning CVR is approximately 62% more volatile than IEP relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — IEP or CVR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
(CVR) is pulling ahead at -14. 3% versus -14. 7% for Icahn Enterprises L. P. (IEP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Icahn Enterprises L. P. grew EPS 46. 4% year-over-year, compared to -27. 4% for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IEP leads at -6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IEP or CVR?
Icahn Enterprises L.
P. (IEP) is the more profitable company, earning -4. 3% net margin versus -20. 8% for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. — meaning it keeps -4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IEP leads at 1. 5% versus -19. 1% for CVR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IEP leads at 9. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — IEP or CVR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Icahn Enterprises L. P. (IEP) offers the highest yield at 10. 1%, versus 3. 1% for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. (CVR).
07Is IEP or CVR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Icahn Enterprises L.
P. (IEP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), 10. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IEP: +21. 4%, CVR: -27. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between IEP and CVR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(IEP: 0.7% · CVR: 5.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.