Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
IKT vs NRXP vs SAVA vs AXSM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
IKT vs NRXP vs SAVA vs AXSM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $119M | $68M | $64M | $13.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $2M | $0.00 | $708M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-51M | $-25M | $-106M | $-188M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.1% | — | 92.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | -7.5% | — | -24.8% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $631K | $0.00 | $241M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $139M | $8M | $129M | $323M |
IKT vs NRXP vs SAVA vs AXSM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inhibikase Therapeu… (IKT) | 100 | 4.0 | -96.0% |
| NRx Pharmaceuticals… (NRXP) | 100 | 1.6 | -98.4% |
| Cassava Sciences, I… (SAVA) | 100 | 234.0 | +134.0% |
| Axsome Therapeutics… (AXSM) | 100 | 313.2 | +213.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IKT vs NRXP vs SAVA vs AXSM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IKT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 129.4% revenue growth vs SAVA's -5.4%
NRXP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SAVA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 77.6%
- 5.4% margin vs NRXP's -10.7%
AXSM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.63
- 35.3% 10Y total return vs SAVA's -38.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, current ratio 1.55x
- Beta 0.63, current ratio 1.55x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 129.4% revenue growth vs SAVA's -5.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.4% margin vs NRXP's -10.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs NRXP's 2.08 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +134.8% vs SAVA's -36.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -27.8% ROA vs NRXP's -219.6% |
IKT vs NRXP vs SAVA vs AXSM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
IKT vs NRXP vs SAVA vs AXSM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AXSM leads in 4 of 6 categories
IKT leads 1 • NRXP leads 0 • SAVA leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AXSM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AXSM and SAVA operate at a comparable scale, with $708M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -26.6% (AXSM) to -10.7% (NRXP).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $2M | $0 | $708M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$55M | -$31M | -$110M | -$167M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$51M | -$25M | -$106M | -$188M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$36M | -$15M | -$84M | -$71M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +37.1% | — | +92.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -7.5% | — | -24.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -10.7% | — | -26.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -6.5% | — | -10.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +57.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.3% | +87.0% | +62.1% | -3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
AXSM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $119M | $68M | $64M | $13.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$21M | $61M | -$65M | $13.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.41x | -2.93x | -2.54x | -68.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 55.31x | — | 20.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | — | 0.42x | 142.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
IKT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IKT delivers a -41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-41 in annual profit, vs $-3 for AXSM. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NRXP scores 6/9 vs SAVA's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -41.3% | — | -95.8% | -2.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -39.0% | -2.2% | -75.3% | -27.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -108.0% | — | -6.3% | -19.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -38.8% | — | -99.9% | -52.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | — | 2.73x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$139M | -$7M | -$129M | -$82M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $139M | $8M | $129M | $323M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $631,000 | $0 | $241M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -34.34x | — | -34.13x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AXSM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AXSM five years ago would be worth $38,224 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $208 for NRXP. Over the past 12 months, AXSM leads with a +134.8% total return vs SAVA's -36.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AXSM at 50.2% vs SAVA's -27.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.4% | +49.6% | -36.8% | +42.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -14.8% | +12.6% | -36.8% | +134.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.5% | -26.7% | -62.5% | +239.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.3% | -97.9% | -88.0% | +282.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.2% | -95.9% | -38.0% | +3530.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.0% | -9.8% | -27.9% | +50.2% |
Risk & Volatility
AXSM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AXSM is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NRXP's 2.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AXSM currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs SAVA's 26.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.92x | 2.05x | 1.92x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.26 | $5.05 | $4.98 | $257.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.33 | $1.62 | $1.27 | $96.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.9% | +77.5% | +26.5% | +98.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.0 | 52.0 | 42.7 | 69.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 794K | 1.3M | 134K | 692K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IKT as "Hold", SAVA as "Buy", AXSM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 199.4% upside for IKT (target: $5) vs 3.4% for AXSM (target: $262).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.00 | — | — | $262.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | — | 12 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AXSM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IKT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency).
IKT vs NRXP vs SAVA vs AXSM: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IKT or NRXP or SAVA or AXSM a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Cassava Sciences, Inc.
(SAVA) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IKT or NRXP or SAVA or AXSM?
Over the past 5 years, Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
(AXSM) delivered a total return of +282. 2%, compared to -97. 9% for NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NRXP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AXSM returned +35. 5% versus IKT's -97. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IKT or NRXP or SAVA or AXSM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
(AXSM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 05β — meaning NRXP is approximately 224% more volatile than AXSM relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — IKT or NRXP or SAVA or AXSM?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cassava Sciences, Inc.
grew EPS 77. 6% year-over-year, compared to 38. 6% for Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IKT or NRXP or SAVA or AXSM?
Inhibikase Therapeutics, Inc.
(IKT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -23. 4% for NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IKT leads at 0. 0% versus -1324. 4% for NRXP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AXSM leads at 92. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — IKT or NRXP or SAVA or AXSM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is IKT or NRXP or SAVA or AXSM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
(AXSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63)). NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NRXP) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AXSM: +35. 5%, NRXP: -96. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between IKT and NRXP and SAVA and AXSM?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NRXP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SAVA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AXSM is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.