Regulated Electric
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
IMSR vs BWXT vs JPM vs NNE vs OKLO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Banks - Diversified
Industrial - Machinery
Regulated Electric
IMSR vs BWXT vs JPM vs NNE vs OKLO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Aerospace & Defense | Banks - Diversified | Industrial - Machinery | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | $625M | $17.77B | $892.31B | $1.04B | $10.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $3.38B | $280.33B | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-46M | $345M | $57.05B | $-31M | $-129M |
| Gross Margin | — | 16.8% | 60.0% | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 11.0% | 25.9% | — | — |
| Forward P/E | — | 41.3x | 14.3x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $2.02B | $942.38B | $3M | $1M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $97M | $503M | $343.34B | $203M | $788M |
IMSR vs BWXT vs JPM vs NNE vs OKLO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BWX Technologies, I… (BWXT) | 100 | 210.5 | +110.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 157.6 | +57.6% |
| Nano Nuclear Energy… (NNE) | 100 | 335.7 | +235.7% |
| Oklo Inc. (OKLO) | 100 | 603.2 | +503.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMSR vs BWXT vs JPM vs NNE vs OKLO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMSR plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
BWXT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.3%, EPS growth 16.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.7%
- 18.3% revenue growth vs OKLO's -125.2%
- +39.6% vs IMSR's -66.7%
- 8.6% ROA vs IMSR's -21.0%, ROIC 10.1% vs -18.8%
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- 475.6% 10Y total return vs NNE's 383.2%
- PEG 0.81 vs BWXT's 9.62
- Beta 0.94, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.52x
NNE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 3.93, Low D/E 1.3%, current ratio 53.48x
Among these 5 stocks, OKLO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.3% revenue growth vs OKLO's -125.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs IMSR's -1.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs IMSR's 4.60 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs BWXT's 0.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.6% vs IMSR's -66.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs IMSR's -21.0%, ROIC 10.1% vs -18.8% |
IMSR vs BWXT vs JPM vs NNE vs OKLO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
IMSR vs BWXT vs JPM vs NNE vs OKLO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories
BWXT leads 1 • NNE leads 1 • IMSR leads 0 • OKLO leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and OKLO operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BWXT's 10.2%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $3.4B | $280.3B | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$38M | $458M | $81.4B | -$44M | -$172M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$46M | $345M | $57.0B | -$31M | -$129M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$242M | $328M | $100.9B | -$38M | -$943M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +16.8% | +60.0% | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +11.0% | +25.9% | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +10.2% | +20.4% | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +9.7% | +36.0% | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +26.1% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -60.3% | +20.7% | +16.0% | +68.4% | -167.6% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.9x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 71% valuation discount to BWXT's 54.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs BWXT's 12.59x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $625M | $17.8B | $892.3B | $1.0B | $10.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $530M | $19.3B | $1.49T | $842M | $9.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -19.38x | 54.02x | 15.93x | -23.66x | -84.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 41.26x | 14.34x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 12.59x | 0.90x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 44.59x | 18.32x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 5.56x | 3.19x | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.83x | 14.44x | 2.46x | 4.27x | 6.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 60.17x | 8.85x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BWXT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BWXT delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-23 for IMSR. OKLO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IMSR scores 5/9 vs OKLO's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -23.4% | +27.9% | +15.9% | -7.6% | -8.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -21.0% | +8.6% | +1.3% | -7.5% | -8.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.8% | +10.1% | +4.5% | -2.6% | -24.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.7% | +10.8% | +8.9% | -35.8% | -15.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 1.63x | 2.60x | 0.01x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$95M | $1.5B | $599.0B | -$200M | -$787M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $97M | $503M | $343.3B | $203M | $788M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $2.0B | $942.4B | $3M | $1M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.45x | 10.88x | 0.74x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NNE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NNE five years ago would be worth $48,324 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,332 for IMSR. Over the past 12 months, BWXT leads with a +39.6% total return vs IMSR's -66.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NNE at 69.1% vs IMSR's -30.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.8% | +6.9% | -0.9% | -9.2% | -21.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -66.7% | +39.6% | +20.3% | -27.6% | -7.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.7% | +190.7% | +133.8% | +383.2% | +309.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.7% | +212.1% | +120.7% | +383.2% | +309.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.7% | +474.2% | +475.6% | +383.2% | +309.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -30.7% | +42.7% | +32.7% | +69.1% | +60.0% |
Risk & Volatility
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMSR's 4.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs IMSR's 27.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.60x | 1.88x | 0.94x | 3.93x | 3.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.16 | $241.82 | $337.25 | $60.87 | $193.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.33 | $133.84 | $266.85 | $18.95 | $44.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.8% | +80.2% | +94.7% | +41.2% | +31.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.8 | 46.2 | 65.0 | 44.2 | 42.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 915K | 7.0M | 2.6M | 13.4M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BWXT as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", NNE as "Buy", OKLO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.4% upside for NNE (target: $50) vs 6.4% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, JPM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.86% vs BWXT's 0.52%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.50 | $225.00 | $339.75 | $50.00 | $91.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 | 61 | 3 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.5% | +1.9% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 10 | 15 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.01 | $5.95 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | +3.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BWXT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency).
IMSR vs BWXT vs JPM vs NNE vs OKLO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMSR or BWXT or JPM or NNE or OKLO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BWX Technologies, Inc.
(BWXT) is the stronger pick with 18. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (14. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IMSR or BWXT or JPM or NNE or OKLO?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 15. 9x versus BWX Technologies, Inc. at 54. 0x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus BWX Technologies, Inc. 's 9. 62x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IMSR or BWXT or JPM or NNE or OKLO?
Over the past 5 years, Nano Nuclear Energy Inc (NNE) delivered a total return of +383.
2%, compared to -66. 7% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +475. 6% versus IMSR's -66. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IMSR or BWXT or JPM or NNE or OKLO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Terrestrial Energy Inc. 's 4. 60β — meaning IMSR is approximately 387% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oklo Inc. (OKLO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IMSR or BWXT or JPM or NNE or OKLO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BWX Technologies, Inc.
(BWXT) is pulling ahead at 18. 3% versus -100. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BWX Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 16. 9% year-over-year, compared to -200. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IMSR or BWXT or JPM or NNE or OKLO?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 0. 0% for Oklo Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 0. 0% for OKLO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IMSR or BWXT or JPM or NNE or OKLO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus BWX Technologies, Inc. 's 9. 62x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 3x forward P/E versus 41. 3x for BWX Technologies, Inc. — 26. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NNE: 99. 4% to $50. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — IMSR or BWXT or JPM or NNE or OKLO?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield), BWXT (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. IMSR, NNE, OKLO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IMSR or BWXT or JPM or NNE or OKLO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +475. 6% 10Y return). Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR) carries a higher beta of 4. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +475. 6%, IMSR: -66. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IMSR and BWXT and JPM and NNE and OKLO?
These companies operate in different sectors (IMSR (Energy) and BWXT (Industrials) and JPM (Financial Services) and NNE (Industrials) and OKLO (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IMSR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BWXT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; NNE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OKLO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. BWXT, JPM pay a dividend while IMSR, NNE, OKLO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.