Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
IMSR logo
IMSR
GEV logo
GEV
PLUG logo
PLUG
MHK logo
MHK
BE logo
BE
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

IMSR vs GEV vs PLUG vs MHK vs BE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
IMSR
Terrestrial Energy Inc.

Regulated Electric

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$625M
5Y Perf.-19.7%
GEV
GE Vernova Inc.

Renewable Utilities

UtilitiesNYSE • US
Market Cap$263.10B
5Y Perf.+616.0%
PLUG
Plug Power Inc.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.21B
5Y Perf.-18.6%
MHK
Mohawk Industries, Inc.

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.82B
5Y Perf.-14.9%
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$65.99B
5Y Perf.+2342.2%

IMSR vs GEV vs PLUG vs MHK vs BE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
IMSR logoIMSR
GEV logoGEV
PLUG logoPLUG
MHK logoMHK
BE logoBE
IndustryRegulated ElectricRenewable UtilitiesElectrical Equipment & PartsFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesElectrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$625M$263.10B$3.21B$6.82B$65.99B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$39.38B$740M$10.99B$2.45B
Net Income (TTM)$-46M$9.38B$-1.68B$414M$6M
Gross Margin19.9%-25.7%24.3%31.1%
Operating Margin3.9%-82.7%4.9%8.2%
Forward P/E33.4x13.0x128.5x
Total Debt$2M$0.00$997M$2.76B$2.99B
Cash & Equiv.$97M$8.85B$555M$856M$2.45B

IMSR vs GEV vs PLUG vs MHK vs BELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

IMSR
GEV
PLUG
MHK
BE
StockMar 24Jun 26Return
GE Vernova Inc. (GEV)100716.0+616.0%
Plug Power Inc. (PLUG)10081.4-18.6%
Mohawk Industries, … (MHK)10085.1-14.9%
Bloom Energy Corpor… (BE)1002442.2+2342.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: IMSR vs GEV vs PLUG vs MHK vs BE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GEV leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Mohawk Industries, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. BE also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇GEV emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
IMSR
Terrestrial Energy Inc.
The Energy Pick

IMSR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: energy exposure
GEV
GE Vernova Inc.
The Income Pick

GEV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.99, yield 0.1%
  • Beta 1.99, yield 0.1%, current ratio 0.98x
  • 23.8% margin vs PLUG's -227.1%
  • 0.1% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability and defensive
PLUG
Plug Power Inc.
The Industrials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, PLUG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
MHK
Mohawk Industries, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

MHK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.46, Low D/E 33.0%, current ratio 2.19x
  • Lower P/E (13.0x vs 128.5x)
  • Beta 1.46 vs IMSR's 4.60
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation
The Growth Play

BE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 37.3%, EPS growth -184.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.1%
  • 10.0% 10Y total return vs GEV's 6.5%
  • 37.3% revenue growth vs IMSR's -100.0%
  • +11.0% vs IMSR's -66.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBE logoBE37.3% revenue growth vs IMSR's -100.0%
ValueMHK logoMHKLower P/E (13.0x vs 128.5x)
Quality / MarginsGEV logoGEV23.8% margin vs PLUG's -227.1%
Stability / SafetyMHK logoMHKBeta 1.46 vs IMSR's 4.60
DividendsGEV logoGEV0.1% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BE logoBE+11.0% vs IMSR's -66.7%
Efficiency (ROA)GEV logoGEV15.2% ROA vs PLUG's -58.8%, ROIC 27.9% vs -24.7%

IMSR vs GEV vs PLUG vs MHK vs BE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Renewable Energy Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Renewable Energy Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
IMSRTerrestrial Energy Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

GEVGE Vernova Inc.
FY 2025
Product
55.0%$20.9B
Service
45.0%$17.1B
PLUGPlug Power Inc.
FY 2025
Sale Of Electrolyzers
26.5%$188M
Fuel Delivered To Customers
18.8%$133M
Power Purchase Agreements
15.2%$108M
Sale of cryogenic equipment
13.5%$96M
Services Performed On Fuel Cell Systems And Related Infrastructure
13.3%$94M
Sales Of Fuel Cell Systems
7.6%$54M
Sale Of Hydrogen Infrastructure
3.8%$27M
Other (2)
1.4%$10M
MHKMohawk Industries, Inc.
FY 2025
Global Ceramic Segment
43.5%$4.2B
Carpet And Resilient
38.5%$3.7B
Laminate and Wood
18.1%$1.8B
BEBloom Energy Corporation
FY 2025
Product
75.6%$1.5B
Service
11.3%$228M
Installation
10.2%$206M
Electricity
3.0%$60M

IMSR vs GEV vs PLUG vs MHK vs BE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGEVLAGGINGPLUG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

GEV and IMSR operate at a comparable scale, with $39.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. GEV is the more profitable business, keeping 23.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLUG's -2.3%. On growth, BE holds the edge at +130.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricIMSR logoIMSRTerrestrial Energ…GEV logoGEVGE Vernova Inc.PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$39.4B$740M$11.0B$2.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$38M$2.2B-$574M$1.2B$240M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$46M$9.4B-$1.7B$414M$6M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$242M$3.6B-$666M$709M$233M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+19.9%-25.7%+24.3%+31.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+3.9%-82.7%+4.9%+8.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+23.8%-2.3%+3.8%+0.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+9.2%-90.1%+6.5%+9.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+16.1%+22.3%+8.0%+130.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-60.3%+18.2%+14.3%+65.2%+3.3%
BE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MHK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 18.8x trailing earnings, MHK trades at a 66% valuation discount to GEV's 55.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MHK's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BE's 539.3x.

MetricIMSR logoIMSRTerrestrial Energ…GEV logoGEVGE Vernova Inc.PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…
Market CapShares × price$625M$263.1B$3.2B$6.8B$66.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$530M$254.2B$3.7B$8.7B$66.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-19.38x55.35x-1.99x18.79x-741.89x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.33.38x12.98x128.48x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple113.45x7.51x539.28x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.91x4.52x0.63x32.60x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.83x21.98x3.23x0.83x83.22x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF70.90x11.07x1153.91x
MHK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

GEV leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

GEV delivers a 79.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $80 in annual profit, vs $-133 for PLUG. IMSR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BE's 3.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GEV scores 6/9 vs BE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricIMSR logoIMSRTerrestrial Energ…GEV logoGEVGE Vernova Inc.PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-23.4%+79.7%-133.4%+5.0%+0.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-21.0%+15.2%-58.8%+3.0%+0.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-18.8%+27.9%-24.7%+3.9%+4.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-16.7%+6.6%-28.1%+4.8%+2.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956464
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.99x0.33x3.77x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$95M-$8.8B$442M$1.9B$538M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$97M$8.8B$555M$856M$2.5B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$0$997M$2.8B$3.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-5.45x-8.61x36.90x1.05x
GEV leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BE five years ago would be worth $113,009 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $959 for PLUG. Over the past 12 months, BE leads with a +1098.2% total return vs IMSR's -66.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BE at 151.1% vs PLUG's -36.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricIMSR logoIMSRTerrestrial Energ…GEV logoGEVGE Vernova Inc.PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+15.8%+44.2%+25.6%+1.8%+178.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-66.7%+101.0%+113.7%+8.1%+1098.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-66.7%+647.5%-74.1%+10.3%+1483.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-66.7%+647.5%-90.4%-41.2%+1030.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-66.7%+647.5%+60.0%-42.2%+998.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-30.7%+95.5%-36.3%+3.3%+151.1%
BE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MHK and BE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MHK is the less volatile stock with a 1.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMSR's 4.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BE currently trades 85.0% from its 52-week high vs IMSR's 27.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricIMSR logoIMSRTerrestrial Energ…GEV logoGEVGE Vernova Inc.PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5004.60x1.99x2.76x1.46x4.04x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$27.16$1181.95$4.58$143.13$322.83
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.33$479.04$1.03$92.99$20.93
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+27.8%+82.8%+61.1%+77.9%+85.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.844.134.355.648.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.0M2.3M76.6M817K9.8M
Evenly matched — MHK and BE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

GEV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: GEV as "Buy", PLUG as "Buy", MHK as "Hold", BE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 78.6% upside for IMSR (target: $14) vs -33.9% for PLUG (target: $2). GEV is the only dividend payer here at 0.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricIMSR logoIMSRTerrestrial Energ…GEV logoGEVGE Vernova Inc.PLUG logoPLUGPlug Power Inc.MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…BE logoBEBloom Energy Corp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$13.50$1134.22$1.85$124.25$230.47
# AnalystsCovering analysts28383231
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.1%+0.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises200
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.00$0.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.3%0.0%+2.2%0.0%
GEV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

BE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). GEV leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallGE Vernova Inc. (GEV)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

IMSR vs GEV vs PLUG vs MHK vs BE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is IMSR or GEV or PLUG or MHK or BE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is the stronger pick with 37.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) offers the better valuation at 18. 8x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — IMSR or GEV or PLUG or MHK or BE?

On trailing P/E, Mohawk Industries, Inc.

(MHK) is the cheapest at 18. 8x versus GE Vernova Inc. at 55. 3x. On forward P/E, Mohawk Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — IMSR or GEV or PLUG or MHK or BE?

Over the past 5 years, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) delivered a total return of +1030%, compared to -90.

4% for Plug Power Inc. (PLUG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BE returned +998. 0% versus IMSR's -66. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — IMSR or GEV or PLUG or MHK or BE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mohawk Industries, Inc.

(MHK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 46β versus Terrestrial Energy Inc. 's 4. 60β — meaning IMSR is approximately 214% more volatile than MHK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 4% for Bloom Energy Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — IMSR or GEV or PLUG or MHK or BE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is pulling ahead at 37.

3% versus -100. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GE Vernova Inc. grew EPS 217. 0% year-over-year, compared to -200. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BE leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — IMSR or GEV or PLUG or MHK or BE?

GE Vernova Inc.

(GEV) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 8% net margin versus -229. 8% for Plug Power Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MHK leads at 4. 7% versus -95. 7% for PLUG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BE leads at 29. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is IMSR or GEV or PLUG or MHK or BE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Mohawk Industries, Inc.

(MHK) trades at 13. 0x forward P/E versus 128. 5x for Bloom Energy Corporation — 115. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMSR: 78. 6% to $13. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — IMSR or GEV or PLUG or MHK or BE?

In this comparison, GEV (0.

1% yield) pays a dividend. IMSR, PLUG, MHK, BE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is IMSR or GEV or PLUG or MHK or BE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+998.

0% 10Y return). Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR) carries a higher beta of 4. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BE: +998. 0%, IMSR: -66. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between IMSR and GEV and PLUG and MHK and BE?

These companies operate in different sectors (IMSR (Energy) and GEV (Utilities) and PLUG (Industrials) and MHK (Consumer Cyclical) and BE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: IMSR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GEV is a large-cap quality compounder stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MHK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.