Regulated Electric
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
IMSR vs NNE vs OKLO vs KO vs SMR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Regulated Electric
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Renewable Utilities
IMSR vs NNE vs OKLO vs KO vs SMR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Industrial - Machinery | Regulated Electric | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Renewable Utilities |
| Market Cap | $625M | $1.04B | $10.57B | $348.25B | $1.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $49.28B | $19M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-46M | $-31M | $-129M | $13.70B | $-386M |
| Gross Margin | — | — | — | 61.7% | 22.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | — | — | 29.3% | -38.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 24.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $3M | $1M | $45.49B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $97M | $203M | $788M | $10.27B | $836M |
IMSR vs NNE vs OKLO vs KO vs SMR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nano Nuclear Energy… (NNE) | 100 | 335.7 | +235.7% |
| Oklo Inc. (OKLO) | 100 | 603.2 | +503.2% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 128.6 | +28.6% |
| NuScale Power Corpo… (SMR) | 100 | 121.9 | +21.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMSR vs NNE vs OKLO vs KO vs SMR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMSR plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
NNE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- beta 3.93
- 383.2% 10Y total return vs OKLO's 309.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 3.93, Low D/E 1.3%, current ratio 53.48x
- Beta 3.93, current ratio 53.48x
OKLO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
- 27.8% margin vs SMR's -20.7%
- 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +17.7% vs SMR's -74.9%
Among these 5 stocks, SMR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.4% revenue growth vs OKLO's -125.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs SMR's -20.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 3.93 vs IMSR's 4.60 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.7% vs SMR's -74.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs SMR's -38.1%, ROIC 15.8% vs -314.7% |
IMSR vs NNE vs OKLO vs KO vs SMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
IMSR vs NNE vs OKLO vs KO vs SMR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories
NNE leads 1 • IMSR leads 0 • OKLO leads 0 • SMR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO and OKLO operate at a comparable scale, with $49.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMR's -20.7%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $0 | $49.3B | $19M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$38M | -$44M | -$172M | $15.5B | -$711M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$46M | -$31M | -$129M | $13.7B | -$386M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$242M | -$38M | -$943M | $12.6B | -$1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | +61.7% | +22.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | +29.3% | -38.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | +27.8% | -20.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | +25.5% | -74.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +12.1% | -95.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -60.3% | +68.4% | -167.6% | +18.2% | -145.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — OKLO and KO and SMR each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $625M | $1.0B | $10.6B | $348.2B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $530M | $842M | $9.8B | $383.5B | $589M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -19.38x | -23.66x | -84.36x | 26.62x | -4.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 24.75x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.38x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 25.89x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | 7.26x | 45.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.83x | 4.27x | 6.02x | 10.18x | 1.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 65.76x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-49 for SMR. OKLO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs SMR's 0/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -23.4% | -7.6% | -8.6% | +41.1% | -48.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -21.0% | -7.5% | -8.3% | +13.1% | -38.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.8% | -2.6% | -24.7% | +15.8% | -3.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.7% | -35.8% | -15.7% | +17.3% | -87.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 0 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.01x | 0.00x | 1.33x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$95M | -$200M | -$787M | $35.2B | -$836M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $97M | $203M | $788M | $10.3B | $836M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $3M | $1M | $45.5B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.45x | — | — | 10.70x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NNE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NNE five years ago would be worth $48,324 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,332 for IMSR. Over the past 12 months, KO leads with a +17.7% total return vs SMR's -74.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NNE at 69.1% vs IMSR's -30.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.8% | -9.2% | -21.9% | +18.6% | -34.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -66.7% | -27.6% | -7.2% | +17.7% | -74.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.7% | +383.2% | +309.6% | +42.6% | +31.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.7% | +383.2% | +309.6% | +63.1% | +6.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.7% | +383.2% | +309.6% | +118.2% | +7.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -30.7% | +69.1% | +60.0% | +12.6% | +9.5% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMSR's 4.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs SMR's 18.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.60x | 3.93x | 3.95x | -0.20x | 4.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.16 | $60.87 | $193.84 | $84.04 | $57.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.33 | $18.95 | $44.88 | $65.35 | $8.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.8% | +41.2% | +31.3% | +96.3% | +18.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.8 | 44.2 | 42.9 | 60.8 | 41.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 2.6M | 13.4M | 12.7M | 32.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NNE as "Buy", OKLO as "Buy", KO as "Buy", SMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.4% upside for NNE (target: $50) vs 6.5% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.52% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.50 | $50.00 | $91.50 | $86.13 | $16.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 13 | 48 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +2.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 56 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $2.04 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NNE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
IMSR vs NNE vs OKLO vs KO vs SMR: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMSR or NNE or OKLO or KO or SMR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger pick with 1.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 26. 6x trailing P/E (24. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nano Nuclear Energy Inc (NNE) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IMSR or NNE or OKLO or KO or SMR?
Over the past 5 years, Nano Nuclear Energy Inc (NNE) delivered a total return of +383.
2%, compared to -66. 7% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NNE returned +383. 2% versus IMSR's -66. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IMSR or NNE or OKLO or KO or SMR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Terrestrial Energy Inc. 's 4. 60β — meaning IMSR is approximately -2396% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Oklo Inc. (OKLO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — IMSR or NNE or OKLO or KO or SMR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is pulling ahead at 1.
9% versus -100. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -200. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMR leads at 38. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IMSR or NNE or OKLO or KO or SMR?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -1130. 3% for NuScale Power Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -21. 9% for SMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is IMSR or NNE or OKLO or KO or SMR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NNE: 99.
4% to $50. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — IMSR or NNE or OKLO or KO or SMR?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. IMSR, NNE, OKLO, SMR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is IMSR or NNE or OKLO or KO or SMR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +118. 2% 10Y return). Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR) carries a higher beta of 4. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +118. 2%, IMSR: -66. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between IMSR and NNE and OKLO and KO and SMR?
These companies operate in different sectors (IMSR (Energy) and NNE (Industrials) and OKLO (Utilities) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and SMR (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
KO pays a dividend while IMSR, NNE, OKLO, SMR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.