Regulated Electric
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
IMSR vs UUUU vs UEC vs DNN vs CCJ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Uranium
Uranium
Uranium
Uranium
IMSR vs UUUU vs UEC vs DNN vs CCJ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Electric | Uranium | Uranium | Uranium | Uranium |
| Market Cap | $625M | $3.91B | $5.83B | $3.00B | $46.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $85M | $20M | $4M | $3.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-46M | $-70M | $-104M | $-256M | $589M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.3% | -90.4% | -296.6% | 29.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | -108.3% | -6.3% | -18.5% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 67.2x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $676M | $2M | $614M | $1.02B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $97M | $65M | $149M | $466M | $1.11B |
IMSR vs UUUU vs UEC vs DNN vs CCJ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) | 100 | 1035.8 | +935.8% |
| Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) | 100 | 1342.1 | +1242.1% |
| Denison Mines Corp. (DNN) | 100 | 986.9 | +886.9% |
| Cameco Corporation (CCJ) | 100 | 1044.1 | +944.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMSR vs UUUU vs UEC vs DNN vs CCJ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, IMSR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
UUUU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +169.7% vs IMSR's -66.7%
UEC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 297.4%, EPS growth -172.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 42.4%
- 10.5% 10Y total return vs CCJ's 8.6%
- 297.4% revenue growth vs IMSR's -100.0%
DNN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.04, current ratio 10.75x
- Beta 2.04, current ratio 10.75x
- Beta 2.04 vs IMSR's 4.60
CCJ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 2.24, yield 0.2%
- 16.9% margin vs DNN's -59.1%
- 0.2% yield; 6-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 6.0% ROA vs DNN's -25.7%, ROIC 6.3% vs -13.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 297.4% revenue growth vs IMSR's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.9% margin vs DNN's -59.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.04 vs IMSR's 4.60 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 6-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +169.7% vs IMSR's -66.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs DNN's -25.7%, ROIC 6.3% vs -13.3% |
IMSR vs UUUU vs UEC vs DNN vs CCJ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
IMSR vs UUUU vs UEC vs DNN vs CCJ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CCJ leads in 2 of 6 categories
UEC leads 1 • IMSR leads 0 • UUUU leads 0 • DNN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — UUUU and CCJ each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCJ and IMSR operate at a comparable scale, with $3.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. CCJ is the more profitable business, keeping 16.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DNN's -59.1%. On growth, UUUU holds the edge at +112.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $85M | $20M | $4M | $3.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$38M | -$94M | -$121M | -$61M | $912M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$46M | -$70M | -$104M | -$256M | $589M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$242M | -$96M | -$120M | -$145M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +37.3% | -90.4% | -3.0% | +29.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -108.3% | -6.3% | -18.5% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -82.7% | -5.2% | -59.1% | +16.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -113.2% | -6.0% | -33.5% | +30.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +112.1% | — | -42.2% | +1.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -60.3% | +64.2% | -56.5% | -160.0% | +45.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — IMSR and UEC and CCJ each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $625M | $3.9B | $5.8B | $3.0B | $46.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $530M | $4.5B | $5.7B | $3.1B | $46.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -19.38x | -42.27x | -58.90x | -18.57x | 110.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 67.19x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 73.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 59.28x | 87.22x | 853.56x | 18.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.83x | 5.33x | 5.12x | 11.31x | 9.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 63.77x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CCJ leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CCJ delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-65 for DNN. UEC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DNN's 1.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCJ scores 8/9 vs UUUU's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -23.4% | -10.2% | -8.1% | -65.4% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -21.0% | -6.5% | -7.4% | -25.7% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.8% | -8.5% | -7.2% | -13.3% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.7% | -10.5% | -7.6% | -10.0% | +6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.99x | 0.00x | 1.67x | 0.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$95M | $611M | -$149M | $148M | -$92M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $97M | $65M | $149M | $466M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $676M | $2M | $614M | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.45x | — | -378.44x | -7.55x | 10.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UEC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CCJ five years ago would be worth $53,294 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,332 for IMSR. Over the past 12 months, UUUU leads with a +169.7% total return vs IMSR's -66.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UEC at 53.6% vs IMSR's -30.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.8% | -6.2% | -10.1% | +9.6% | +8.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -66.7% | +169.7% | +76.6% | +78.5% | +54.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.7% | +141.7% | +262.5% | +167.7% | +239.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.7% | +137.0% | +285.0% | +133.8% | +432.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.7% | +508.6% | +1054.9% | +497.7% | +863.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -30.7% | +34.2% | +53.6% | +38.9% | +50.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DNN and CCJ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DNN is the less volatile stock with a 2.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMSR's 4.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CCJ currently trades 79.1% from its 52-week high vs IMSR's 27.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.60x | 2.66x | 2.85x | 2.04x | 2.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.16 | $27.90 | $20.34 | $4.43 | $135.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.33 | $5.33 | $5.90 | $1.67 | $67.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.8% | +56.1% | +57.9% | +74.9% | +79.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.8 | 39.0 | 40.0 | 41.4 | 41.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.0M | 9.4M | 9.2M | 22.4M | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
CCJ leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UUUU as "Buy", UEC as "Buy", DNN as "Buy", CCJ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 78.6% upside for IMSR (target: $14) vs 28.0% for DNN (target: $4). CCJ is the only dividend payer here at 0.16% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.50 | $22.33 | $20.19 | $4.25 | $140.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 | 8 | 8 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | — | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CCJ leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). UEC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
IMSR vs UUUU vs UEC vs DNN vs CCJ: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMSR or UUUU or UEC or DNN or CCJ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Uranium Energy Corp.
(UEC) is the stronger pick with 297. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). Cameco Corporation (CCJ) offers the better valuation at 110. 9x trailing P/E (67. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IMSR or UUUU or UEC or DNN or CCJ?
Over the past 5 years, Cameco Corporation (CCJ) delivered a total return of +432.
9%, compared to -66. 7% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UEC returned +1055% versus IMSR's -66. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IMSR or UUUU or UEC or DNN or CCJ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Denison Mines Corp.
(DNN) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 04β versus Terrestrial Energy Inc. 's 4. 60β — meaning IMSR is approximately 125% more volatile than DNN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 167% for Denison Mines Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — IMSR or UUUU or UEC or DNN or CCJ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Uranium Energy Corp.
(UEC) is pulling ahead at 297. 4% versus -100. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cameco Corporation grew EPS 246. 2% year-over-year, compared to -200. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UUUU leads at 74. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IMSR or UUUU or UEC or DNN or CCJ?
Cameco Corporation (CCJ) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
9% net margin versus -44. 2% for Denison Mines Corp. — meaning it keeps 16. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCJ leads at 16. 7% versus -1748. 4% for DNN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DNN leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is IMSR or UUUU or UEC or DNN or CCJ more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMSR: 78.
6% to $13. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — IMSR or UUUU or UEC or DNN or CCJ?
In this comparison, CCJ (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. IMSR, UUUU, UEC, DNN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is IMSR or UUUU or UEC or DNN or CCJ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Uranium Energy Corp.
(UEC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1055% 10Y return). Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR) carries a higher beta of 4. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UEC: +1055%, IMSR: -66. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between IMSR and UUUU and UEC and DNN and CCJ?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IMSR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UUUU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UEC is a small-cap high-growth stock; DNN is a small-cap high-growth stock; CCJ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.