Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
IMSR logo
IMSR
UUUU logo
UUUU
UEC logo
UEC
DNN logo
DNN
CCJ logo
CCJ
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

IMSR vs UUUU vs UEC vs DNN vs CCJ

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
IMSR
Terrestrial Energy Inc.

Regulated Electric

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$625M
5Y Perf.-19.7%
UUUU
Energy Fuels Inc.

Uranium

EnergyAMEX • US
Market Cap$3.91B
5Y Perf.+935.8%
UEC
Uranium Energy Corp.

Uranium

EnergyAMEX • US
Market Cap$5.83B
5Y Perf.+1242.1%
DNN
Denison Mines Corp.

Uranium

EnergyAMEX • CA
Market Cap$3.00B
5Y Perf.+886.9%
CCJ
Cameco Corporation

Uranium

EnergyNYSE • CA
Market Cap$46.60B
5Y Perf.+944.1%

IMSR vs UUUU vs UEC vs DNN vs CCJ — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
IMSR logoIMSR
UUUU logoUUUU
UEC logoUEC
DNN logoDNN
CCJ logoCCJ
IndustryRegulated ElectricUraniumUraniumUraniumUranium
Market Cap$625M$3.91B$5.83B$3.00B$46.60B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$85M$20M$4M$3.48B
Net Income (TTM)$-46M$-70M$-104M$-256M$589M
Gross Margin37.3%-90.4%-296.6%29.4%
Operating Margin-108.3%-6.3%-18.5%17.5%
Forward P/E67.2x
Total Debt$2M$676M$2M$614M$1.02B
Cash & Equiv.$97M$65M$149M$466M$1.11B

IMSR vs UUUU vs UEC vs DNN vs CCJLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

IMSR
UUUU
UEC
DNN
CCJ
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU)1001035.8+935.8%
Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC)1001342.1+1242.1%
Denison Mines Corp. (DNN)100986.9+886.9%
Cameco Corporation (CCJ)1001044.1+944.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: IMSR vs UUUU vs UEC vs DNN vs CCJ

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CCJ leads in 3 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Energy Fuels Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. UEC and DNN also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇CCJ emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
IMSR
Terrestrial Energy Inc.
The Energy Pick

Among these 5 stocks, IMSR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: energy exposure
UUUU
Energy Fuels Inc.
The Momentum Pick

UUUU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +169.7% vs IMSR's -66.7%
Best for: momentum
UEC
Uranium Energy Corp.
The Growth Play

UEC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 297.4%, EPS growth -172.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 42.4%
  • 10.5% 10Y total return vs CCJ's 8.6%
  • 297.4% revenue growth vs IMSR's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
DNN
Denison Mines Corp.
The Defensive Pick

DNN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 2.04, current ratio 10.75x
  • Beta 2.04, current ratio 10.75x
  • Beta 2.04 vs IMSR's 4.60
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
The Income Pick

CCJ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 2.24, yield 0.2%
  • 16.9% margin vs DNN's -59.1%
  • 0.2% yield; 6-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • 6.0% ROA vs DNN's -25.7%, ROIC 6.3% vs -13.3%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthUEC logoUEC297.4% revenue growth vs IMSR's -100.0%
Quality / MarginsCCJ logoCCJ16.9% margin vs DNN's -59.1%
Stability / SafetyDNN logoDNNBeta 2.04 vs IMSR's 4.60
DividendsCCJ logoCCJ0.2% yield; 6-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)UUUU logoUUUU+169.7% vs IMSR's -66.7%
Efficiency (ROA)CCJ logoCCJ6.0% ROA vs DNN's -25.7%, ROIC 6.3% vs -13.3%

IMSR vs UUUU vs UEC vs DNN vs CCJ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Critical Minerals Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Critical Minerals Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
IMSRTerrestrial Energy Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

UUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

UECUranium Energy Corp.
FY 2025
Sale of Inventory
100.0%$67M
DNNDenison Mines Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

CCJCameco Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

IMSR vs UUUU vs UEC vs DNN vs CCJ — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCCJLAGGINGDNN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — UUUU and CCJ each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CCJ and IMSR operate at a comparable scale, with $3.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. CCJ is the more profitable business, keeping 16.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DNN's -59.1%. On growth, UUUU holds the edge at +112.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricIMSR logoIMSRTerrestrial Energ…UUUU logoUUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.UEC logoUECUranium Energy Co…DNN logoDNNDenison Mines Cor…CCJ logoCCJCameco Corporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$85M$20M$4M$3.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$38M-$94M-$121M-$61M$912M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$46M-$70M-$104M-$256M$589M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$242M-$96M-$120M-$145M$1.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+37.3%-90.4%-3.0%+29.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-108.3%-6.3%-18.5%+17.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-82.7%-5.2%-59.1%+16.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-113.2%-6.0%-33.5%+30.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+112.1%-42.2%+1.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-60.3%+64.2%-56.5%-160.0%+45.2%
Evenly matched — UUUU and CCJ each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — IMSR and UEC and CCJ each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricIMSR logoIMSRTerrestrial Energ…UUUU logoUUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.UEC logoUECUranium Energy Co…DNN logoDNNDenison Mines Cor…CCJ logoCCJCameco Corporation
Market CapShares × price$625M$3.9B$5.8B$3.0B$46.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$530M$4.5B$5.7B$3.1B$46.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-19.38x-42.27x-58.90x-18.57x110.86x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.67.19x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple73.51x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue59.28x87.22x853.56x18.73x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.83x5.33x5.12x11.31x9.45x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF63.77x
Evenly matched — IMSR and UEC and CCJ each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CCJ leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

CCJ delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-65 for DNN. UEC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DNN's 1.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCJ scores 8/9 vs UUUU's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricIMSR logoIMSRTerrestrial Energ…UUUU logoUUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.UEC logoUECUranium Energy Co…DNN logoDNNDenison Mines Cor…CCJ logoCCJCameco Corporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-23.4%-10.2%-8.1%-65.4%+8.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-21.0%-6.5%-7.4%-25.7%+6.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-18.8%-8.5%-7.2%-13.3%+6.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-16.7%-10.5%-7.6%-10.0%+6.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–952548
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.99x0.00x1.67x0.15x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$95M$611M-$149M$148M-$92M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$97M$65M$149M$466M$1.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$676M$2M$614M$1.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-5.45x-378.44x-7.55x10.04x
CCJ leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

UEC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CCJ five years ago would be worth $53,294 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,332 for IMSR. Over the past 12 months, UUUU leads with a +169.7% total return vs IMSR's -66.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UEC at 53.6% vs IMSR's -30.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricIMSR logoIMSRTerrestrial Energ…UUUU logoUUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.UEC logoUECUranium Energy Co…DNN logoDNNDenison Mines Cor…CCJ logoCCJCameco Corporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+15.8%-6.2%-10.1%+9.6%+8.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-66.7%+169.7%+76.6%+78.5%+54.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-66.7%+141.7%+262.5%+167.7%+239.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-66.7%+137.0%+285.0%+133.8%+432.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-66.7%+508.6%+1054.9%+497.7%+863.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-30.7%+34.2%+53.6%+38.9%+50.3%
UEC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — DNN and CCJ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

DNN is the less volatile stock with a 2.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMSR's 4.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CCJ currently trades 79.1% from its 52-week high vs IMSR's 27.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricIMSR logoIMSRTerrestrial Energ…UUUU logoUUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.UEC logoUECUranium Energy Co…DNN logoDNNDenison Mines Cor…CCJ logoCCJCameco Corporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5004.60x2.66x2.85x2.04x2.24x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$27.16$27.90$20.34$4.43$135.24
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.33$5.33$5.90$1.67$67.60
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+27.8%+56.1%+57.9%+74.9%+79.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.839.040.041.441.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.0M9.4M9.2M22.4M2.9M
Evenly matched — DNN and CCJ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CCJ leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: UUUU as "Buy", UEC as "Buy", DNN as "Buy", CCJ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 78.6% upside for IMSR (target: $14) vs 28.0% for DNN (target: $4). CCJ is the only dividend payer here at 0.16% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricIMSR logoIMSRTerrestrial Energ…UUUU logoUUUUEnergy Fuels Inc.UEC logoUECUranium Energy Co…DNN logoDNNDenison Mines Cor…CCJ logoCCJCameco Corporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$13.50$22.33$20.19$4.25$140.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts88819
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises06
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.24
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
CCJ leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CCJ leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). UEC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallCameco Corporation (CCJ)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

IMSR vs UUUU vs UEC vs DNN vs CCJ: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is IMSR or UUUU or UEC or DNN or CCJ a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Uranium Energy Corp.

(UEC) is the stronger pick with 297. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). Cameco Corporation (CCJ) offers the better valuation at 110. 9x trailing P/E (67. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — IMSR or UUUU or UEC or DNN or CCJ?

Over the past 5 years, Cameco Corporation (CCJ) delivered a total return of +432.

9%, compared to -66. 7% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UEC returned +1055% versus IMSR's -66. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — IMSR or UUUU or UEC or DNN or CCJ?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Denison Mines Corp.

(DNN) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 04β versus Terrestrial Energy Inc. 's 4. 60β — meaning IMSR is approximately 125% more volatile than DNN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 167% for Denison Mines Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — IMSR or UUUU or UEC or DNN or CCJ?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Uranium Energy Corp.

(UEC) is pulling ahead at 297. 4% versus -100. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cameco Corporation grew EPS 246. 2% year-over-year, compared to -200. 0% for Terrestrial Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UUUU leads at 74. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — IMSR or UUUU or UEC or DNN or CCJ?

Cameco Corporation (CCJ) is the more profitable company, earning 16.

9% net margin versus -44. 2% for Denison Mines Corp. — meaning it keeps 16. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCJ leads at 16. 7% versus -1748. 4% for DNN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DNN leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is IMSR or UUUU or UEC or DNN or CCJ more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMSR: 78.

6% to $13. 50.

07

Which pays a better dividend — IMSR or UUUU or UEC or DNN or CCJ?

In this comparison, CCJ (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. IMSR, UUUU, UEC, DNN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is IMSR or UUUU or UEC or DNN or CCJ better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Uranium Energy Corp.

(UEC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1055% 10Y return). Terrestrial Energy Inc. (IMSR) carries a higher beta of 4. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UEC: +1055%, IMSR: -66. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between IMSR and UUUU and UEC and DNN and CCJ?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: IMSR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UUUU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UEC is a small-cap high-growth stock; DNN is a small-cap high-growth stock; CCJ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.