Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
IMUX logo
IMUX
ARQT logo
ARQT
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

IMUX vs ARQT vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
IMUX
Immunic, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$129M
5Y Perf.-88.6%
ARQT
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.08B
5Y Perf.-29.0%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$875.80B
5Y Perf.+218.2%

IMUX vs ARQT vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
IMUX logoIMUX
ARQT logoARQT
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$129M$3.08B$875.80B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$416M$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-104M$-2M$57.05B
Gross Margin90.9%60.0%
Operating Margin0.8%25.9%
Forward P/E123.5x14.1x
Total Debt$684K$6M$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$15M$43M$343.34B

IMUX vs ARQT vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

IMUX
ARQT
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Immunic, Inc. (IMUX)10011.4-88.6%
Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT)10071.0-29.0%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100318.2+218.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: IMUX vs ARQT vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
IMUX
Immunic, Inc.
The Secondary Option

IMUX plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ARQT
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARQT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.49, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 3.17x
  • Beta 1.49, current ratio 3.17x
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 1.9%
  • 454.4% 10Y total return vs ARQT's 12.8%
  • Lower P/E (14.1x vs 123.5x)
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthARQT logoARQT91.3% revenue growth vs IMUX's -8.2%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.1x vs 123.5x)
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPM20.4% margin vs ARQT's -0.6%
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 0.95 vs IMUX's 1.68
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 2 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ARQT logoARQT+79.1% vs JPM's +19.1%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPM1.3% ROA vs IMUX's -132.0%

IMUX vs ARQT vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

IMUXImmunic, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ARQTArcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
FY 2023
Other Revenue
51.0%$30M
Product
49.0%$29M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

IMUX vs ARQT vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGIMUX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM and IMUX operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARQT's -0.6%.

MetricIMUX logoIMUXImmunic, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$416M$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$109M$6M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$104M-$2M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$81M$27M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+90.9%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.8%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-0.6%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+6.5%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+60.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+56.8%+55.0%+16.0%
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricIMUX logoIMUXImmunic, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$129M$3.1B$875.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$114M$3.0B$1.47T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.09x-189.15x15.64x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.123.51x14.08x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.20x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.11x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue8.18x3.13x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share16.51x2.42x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.68x
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-2 for IMUX. ARQT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs IMUX's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricIMUX logoIMUXImmunic, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.2%-1.4%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-132.0%-0.6%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-5.2%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-17.0%-4.3%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9145
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$15M-$37M$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$15M$43M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$684,000$6M$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.08x0.74x
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ARQT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $20,999 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $920 for IMUX. Over the past 12 months, ARQT leads with a +79.1% total return vs JPM's +19.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARQT at 34.0% vs IMUX's -8.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricIMUX logoIMUXImmunic, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+124.2%-15.2%-2.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+50.2%+79.1%+19.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-22.7%+140.8%+133.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.8%-13.3%+110.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%+12.8%+454.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-8.2%+34.0%+32.6%
ARQT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMUX's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 93.0% from its 52-week high vs ARQT's 77.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricIMUX logoIMUXImmunic, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.68x1.49x0.95x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$15.77$31.77$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.67$12.72$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+82.9%+77.4%+93.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.359.954.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded289K1.5M7.0M
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: IMUX as "Buy", ARQT as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.3% upside for ARQT (target: $34) vs 8.1% for JPM (target: $339). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.90% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricIMUX logoIMUXImmunic, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$14.50$34.00$338.78
# AnalystsCovering analysts121261
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises115
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+3.9%
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ARQT leads in 1 (Total Returns).

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

IMUX vs ARQT vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is IMUX or ARQT or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Immunic, Inc. (IMUX) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — IMUX or ARQT or JPM?

On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

is actually cheaper at 14. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — IMUX or ARQT or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +110. 0%, compared to -90. 8% for Immunic, Inc. (IMUX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +454. 4% versus IMUX's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — IMUX or ARQT or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Immunic, Inc. 's 1. 68β — meaning IMUX is approximately 77% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. (ARQT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — IMUX or ARQT or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus 3. 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 88. 8% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — IMUX or ARQT or JPM?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -4. 3% for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -3. 3% for ARQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARQT leads at 90. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is IMUX or ARQT or JPM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 123. 5x for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — 109. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARQT: 38. 3% to $34. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — IMUX or ARQT or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. IMUX, ARQT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is IMUX or ARQT or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 1. 9% yield, +454. 4% 10Y return). Immunic, Inc. (IMUX) carries a higher beta of 1. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +454. 4%, IMUX: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between IMUX and ARQT and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (IMUX (Healthcare) and ARQT (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: IMUX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while IMUX, ARQT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.