Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs PRAX vs ACAD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs PRAX vs ACAD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $129M | $3.08B | $361M | $7.16B | $3.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $416M | $218M | $0.00 | $1.10B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-104M | $-2M | $-240M | $-327M | $376M |
| Gross Margin | — | 90.9% | 71.1% | — | 91.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 0.8% | -73.6% | — | 7.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 123.5x | — | — | 55.0x |
| Total Debt | $684K | $6M | $13M | $110K | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $43M | $85M | $357M | $178M |
IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs PRAX vs ACAD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immunic, Inc. (IMUX) | 100 | 8.3 | -91.7% |
| Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT) | 100 | 138.0 | +38.0% |
| Vanda Pharmaceutica… (VNDA) | 100 | 57.1 | -42.9% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 47.2 | -52.8% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 46.0 | -54.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs PRAX vs ACAD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, IMUX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ARQT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
- 12.8% 10Y total return vs PRAX's -40.5%
- 91.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
VNDA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.08
- Lower volatility, beta 1.08, Low D/E 3.9%, current ratio 2.39x
- Beta 1.08 vs IMUX's 1.68
PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +456.0% vs ACAD's -4.1%
ACAD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 1.12, current ratio 3.83x
- Better valuation composite
- 34.3% margin vs VNDA's -110.0%
- 26.2% ROA vs IMUX's -132.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 91.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs VNDA's -110.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.08 vs IMUX's 1.68 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +456.0% vs ACAD's -4.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs IMUX's -132.0% |
IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs PRAX vs ACAD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs PRAX vs ACAD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACAD leads in 2 of 6 categories
VNDA leads 1 • PRAX leads 1 • IMUX leads 0 • ARQT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VNDA's -110.0%. On growth, ARQT holds the edge at +60.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $416M | $218M | $0 | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$109M | $6M | -$150M | -$357M | $96M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$104M | -$2M | -$240M | -$327M | $376M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$81M | $27M | -$127M | -$283M | $212M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +90.9% | +71.1% | — | +91.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +0.8% | -73.6% | — | +7.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -0.6% | -110.0% | — | +34.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +6.5% | -58.5% | — | +19.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +60.1% | +3.4% | — | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +56.8% | +55.0% | -64.0% | +2.7% | -81.8% |
Valuation Metrics
VNDA leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $129M | $3.1B | $361M | $7.2B | $3.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $114M | $3.0B | $288M | $6.8B | $3.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.09x | -189.15x | -1.63x | -18.40x | 9.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 123.51x | — | — | 54.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 25.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 8.18x | 1.67x | — | 3.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 16.51x | 1.10x | 6.36x | 2.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 34.83x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-2 for IMUX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACAD's 0.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACAD scores 6/9 vs IMUX's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | -1.4% | -61.4% | -43.0% | +35.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -132.0% | -0.6% | -44.6% | -40.2% | +26.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -5.2% | -32.2% | -65.0% | +10.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -17.0% | -4.3% | -33.6% | -49.3% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.03x | 0.04x | 0.00x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15M | -$37M | -$72M | -$357M | -$126M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $43M | $85M | $357M | $178M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $684,000 | $6M | $13M | $110,000 | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.08x | — | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARQT five years ago would be worth $8,671 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $920 for IMUX. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +456.0% total return vs ACAD's -4.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 158.5% vs IMUX's -8.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +124.2% | -15.2% | -26.1% | -13.4% | -18.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +50.2% | +79.1% | +33.2% | +456.0% | -4.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.7% | +140.8% | -6.7% | +1628.1% | -13.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.8% | -13.3% | -68.2% | -17.6% | -22.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +12.8% | -43.4% | -40.5% | -43.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.2% | +34.0% | -2.3% | +158.5% | -4.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IMUX and VNDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VNDA is the less volatile stock with a 1.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMUX's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMUX currently trades 82.9% from its 52-week high vs VNDA's 61.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.68x | 1.49x | 1.08x | 1.55x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.77 | $31.77 | $9.94 | $366.52 | $27.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.67 | $12.72 | $4.14 | $37.19 | $19.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.9% | +77.4% | +61.4% | +67.7% | +76.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.3 | 59.9 | 41.1 | 28.6 | 46.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 289K | 1.5M | 1.0M | 394K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IMUX as "Buy", ARQT as "Buy", VNDA as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 140.3% upside for PRAX (target: $596) vs 10.9% for IMUX (target: $15).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $34.00 | $14.25 | $595.93 | $34.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 12 | 19 | 16 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ACAD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VNDA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs PRAX vs ACAD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or PRAX or ACAD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (55. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Immunic, Inc. (IMUX) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or PRAX or ACAD?
On forward P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
is actually cheaper at 55. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or PRAX or ACAD?
Over the past 5 years, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) delivered a total return of -13. 3%, compared to -90. 8% for Immunic, Inc. (IMUX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARQT returned +12. 8% versus IMUX's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or PRAX or ACAD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(VNDA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 08β versus Immunic, Inc. 's 1. 68β — meaning IMUX is approximately 56% more volatile than VNDA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 4% for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or PRAX or ACAD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 88. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1068. 8% for Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or PRAX or ACAD?
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -102. 0% for Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACAD leads at 9. 8% versus -70. 0% for VNDA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VNDA leads at 94. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or PRAX or ACAD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) trades at 55. 0x forward P/E versus 123. 5x for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — 68. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 140. 3% to $595. 93.
08Which pays a better dividend — IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or PRAX or ACAD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or PRAX or ACAD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(VNDA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 08)). Immunic, Inc. (IMUX) carries a higher beta of 1. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VNDA: -43. 4%, IMUX: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IMUX and ARQT and VNDA and PRAX and ACAD?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IMUX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; VNDA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.