Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
IMUX logo
IMUX
ARQT logo
ARQT
VNDA logo
VNDA
PRAX logo
PRAX
ACAD logo
ACAD
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs PRAX vs ACAD vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
IMUX
Immunic, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$129M
5Y Perf.-91.3%
ARQT
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.08B
5Y Perf.+20.4%
VNDA
Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$361M
5Y Perf.-45.1%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.16B
5Y Perf.-49.2%
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.66B
5Y Perf.-54.6%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$875.80B
5Y Perf.+205.3%

IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs PRAX vs ACAD vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
IMUX logoIMUX
ARQT logoARQT
VNDA logoVNDA
PRAX logoPRAX
ACAD logoACAD
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$129M$3.08B$361M$7.16B$3.66B$875.80B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$416M$218M$0.00$1.10B$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$-104M$-2M$-240M$-327M$376M$57.05B
Gross Margin90.9%71.1%91.5%60.0%
Operating Margin0.8%-73.6%7.4%25.9%
Forward P/E123.5x55.0x14.1x
Total Debt$684K$6M$13M$110K$52M$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$15M$43M$85M$357M$178M$343.34B

IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs PRAX vs ACAD vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

IMUX
ARQT
VNDA
PRAX
ACAD
JPM
StockOct 20Jun 26Return
Immunic, Inc. (IMUX)1008.8-91.3%
Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT)100120.4+20.4%
Vanda Pharmaceutica… (VNDA)10054.9-45.1%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)10050.8-49.2%
ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD)10045.4-54.6%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100305.3+205.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs PRAX vs ACAD vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JPM leads in 3 of 7 categories (6-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. ARQT and PRAX also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
IMUX
Immunic, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 6 stocks, IMUX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ARQT
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARQT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
  • 91.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure
VNDA
Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.
The Defensive Pick

VNDA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.08, Low D/E 3.9%, current ratio 2.39x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +456.0% vs ACAD's -4.1%
Best for: momentum
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
The Defensive Pick

ACAD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.

  • Beta 1.12, current ratio 3.83x
  • 34.3% margin vs VNDA's -110.0%
  • 26.2% ROA vs IMUX's -132.0%
Best for: defensive
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 1.9%
  • 454.4% 10Y total return vs ARQT's 12.8%
  • Lower P/E (14.1x vs 55.0x)
  • Beta 0.95 vs IMUX's 1.68
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthARQT logoARQT91.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.1x vs 55.0x)
Quality / MarginsACAD logoACAD34.3% margin vs VNDA's -110.0%
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 0.95 vs IMUX's 1.68
DividendsJPM logoJPM1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 5 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRAX logoPRAX+456.0% vs ACAD's -4.1%
Efficiency (ROA)ACAD logoACAD26.2% ROA vs IMUX's -132.0%

IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs PRAX vs ACAD vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

IMUXImmunic, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ARQTArcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
FY 2023
Other Revenue
51.0%$30M
Product
49.0%$29M
VNDAVanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.
FY 2025
Fanapt
62.2%$117M
Hetlioz
37.8%$71M
PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M
ACADACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
FY 2018
Product
100.0%$224M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs PRAX vs ACAD vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGVNDA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — ACAD and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VNDA's -110.0%. On growth, ARQT holds the edge at +60.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricIMUX logoIMUXImmunic, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…VNDA logoVNDAVanda Pharmaceuti…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$416M$218M$0$1.1B$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$109M$6M-$150M-$357M$96M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$104M-$2M-$240M-$327M$376M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$81M$27M-$127M-$283M$212M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+90.9%+71.1%+91.5%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.8%-73.6%+7.4%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-0.6%-110.0%+34.3%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+6.5%-58.5%+19.4%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+60.1%+3.4%+9.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+56.8%+55.0%-64.0%+2.7%-81.8%+16.0%
Evenly matched — ACAD and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.3x trailing earnings, ACAD trades at a 40% valuation discount to JPM's 15.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, JPM's 18.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACAD's 25.5x.

MetricIMUX logoIMUXImmunic, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…VNDA logoVNDAVanda Pharmaceuti…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$129M$3.1B$361M$7.2B$3.7B$875.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$114M$3.0B$288M$6.8B$3.5B$1.47T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.09x-189.15x-1.63x-18.40x9.34x15.64x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.123.51x54.97x14.08x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.20x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple25.46x18.11x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue8.18x1.67x3.42x3.13x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share16.51x1.10x6.36x2.99x2.42x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF34.83x8.68x
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-2 for IMUX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACAD scores 6/9 vs IMUX's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricIMUX logoIMUXImmunic, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…VNDA logoVNDAVanda Pharmaceuti…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.2%-1.4%-61.4%-43.0%+35.6%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-132.0%-0.6%-44.6%-40.2%+26.2%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-5.2%-32.2%-65.0%+10.0%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-17.0%-4.3%-33.6%-49.3%+10.1%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9142365
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.04x0.00x0.04x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$15M-$37M-$72M-$357M-$126M$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$15M$43M$85M$357M$178M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$684,000$6M$13M$110,000$52M$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.08x0.74x
ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $20,999 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $920 for IMUX. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +456.0% total return vs ACAD's -4.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 158.5% vs IMUX's -8.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricIMUX logoIMUXImmunic, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…VNDA logoVNDAVanda Pharmaceuti…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+124.2%-15.2%-26.1%-13.4%-18.2%-2.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+50.2%+79.1%+33.2%+456.0%-4.1%+19.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-22.7%+140.8%-6.7%+1628.1%-13.1%+133.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.8%-13.3%-68.2%-17.6%-22.0%+110.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%+12.8%-43.4%-40.5%-43.9%+454.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-8.2%+34.0%-2.3%+158.5%-4.6%+32.6%
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMUX's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 93.0% from its 52-week high vs VNDA's 61.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricIMUX logoIMUXImmunic, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…VNDA logoVNDAVanda Pharmaceuti…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.68x1.49x1.08x1.55x1.12x0.95x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$15.77$31.77$9.94$366.52$27.81$337.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.67$12.72$4.14$37.19$19.69$262.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+82.9%+77.4%+61.4%+67.7%+76.9%+93.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.359.941.128.646.354.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded289K1.5M1.0M394K1.5M7.0M
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: IMUX as "Buy", ARQT as "Buy", VNDA as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 140.3% upside for PRAX (target: $596) vs 8.1% for JPM (target: $339). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.90% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricIMUX logoIMUXImmunic, Inc.ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…VNDA logoVNDAVanda Pharmaceuti…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$14.50$34.00$14.25$595.93$34.78$338.78
# AnalystsCovering analysts121219163761
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises115
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+3.9%
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). ACAD leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

IMUX vs ARQT vs VNDA vs PRAX vs ACAD vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or PRAX or ACAD or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (55. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Immunic, Inc. (IMUX) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or PRAX or ACAD or JPM?

On trailing P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the cheapest at 9. 3x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 15. 6x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or PRAX or ACAD or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +110. 0%, compared to -90. 8% for Immunic, Inc. (IMUX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +454. 4% versus IMUX's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or PRAX or ACAD or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Immunic, Inc. 's 1. 68β — meaning IMUX is approximately 77% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or PRAX or ACAD or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 88. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1068. 8% for Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or PRAX or ACAD or JPM?

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -102. 0% for Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -70. 0% for VNDA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VNDA leads at 94. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or PRAX or ACAD or JPM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 123. 5x for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — 109. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 140. 3% to $595. 93.

08

Which pays a better dividend — IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or PRAX or ACAD or JPM?

In this comparison, JPM (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. IMUX, ARQT, VNDA, PRAX, ACAD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is IMUX or ARQT or VNDA or PRAX or ACAD or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95), 1. 9% yield, +454. 4% 10Y return). Immunic, Inc. (IMUX) carries a higher beta of 1. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +454. 4%, IMUX: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between IMUX and ARQT and VNDA and PRAX and ACAD and JPM?

These companies operate in different sectors (IMUX (Healthcare) and ARQT (Healthcare) and VNDA (Healthcare) and PRAX (Healthcare) and ACAD (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: IMUX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; VNDA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while IMUX, ARQT, VNDA, PRAX, ACAD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.