Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
IMUX logo
IMUX
IDYA logo
IDYA
KO logo
KO
ARQT logo
ARQT
PRAX logo
PRAX
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

IMUX vs IDYA vs KO vs ARQT vs PRAX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
IMUX
Immunic, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$137M
5Y Perf.-91.3%
IDYA
IDEAYA Biosciences, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.55B
5Y Perf.+138.1%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+71.9%
ARQT
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.05B
5Y Perf.+36.8%
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.70B
5Y Perf.-49.2%

IMUX vs IDYA vs KO vs ARQT vs PRAX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
IMUX logoIMUX
IDYA logoIDYA
KO logoKO
ARQT logoARQT
PRAX logoPRAX
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$137M$2.55B$355.61B$3.05B$7.70B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$225M$49.28B$416M$0.00
Net Income (TTM)$-104M$-140M$13.70B$-2M$-327M
Gross Margin99.5%61.7%90.9%
Operating Margin-81.4%29.3%0.8%
Forward P/E25.3x122.5x
Total Debt$684K$28M$45.49B$6M$110K
Cash & Equiv.$15M$113M$10.27B$43M$357M

IMUX vs IDYA vs KO vs ARQT vs PRAXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

IMUX
IDYA
KO
ARQT
PRAX
StockOct 20Jun 26Return
Immunic, Inc. (IMUX)1008.8-91.3%
IDEAYA Biosciences,… (IDYA)100238.1+138.1%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100171.9+71.9%
Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT)100136.8+36.8%
Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX)10050.8-49.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: IMUX vs IDYA vs KO vs ARQT vs PRAX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KO leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. IDEAYA Biosciences, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. PRAX also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇KO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
IMUX
Immunic, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

IMUX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
IDYA
IDEAYA Biosciences, Inc.
The Income Pick

IDYA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • beta 1.25
  • 159.0% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.25, Low D/E 2.7%, current ratio 11.34x
  • Beta 1.25, current ratio 11.34x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Value Play

KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Better valuation composite
  • 27.8% margin vs IDYA's -62.2%
  • 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • 13.1% ROA vs IMUX's -132.0%
Best for: value and quality
ARQT
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARQT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
Best for: growth exposure
PRAX
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

PRAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +491.9% vs KO's +17.2%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthIDYA logoIDYA30.2% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
ValueKO logoKOBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs IDYA's -62.2%
Stability / SafetyIDYA logoIDYABeta 1.25 vs IMUX's 1.80
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PRAX logoPRAX+491.9% vs KO's +17.2%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs IMUX's -132.0%

IMUX vs IDYA vs KO vs ARQT vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

IMUXImmunic, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

IDYAIDEAYA Biosciences, Inc.
FY 2025
Research and Development Services
100.0%$162M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
ARQTArcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
FY 2023
Other Revenue
51.0%$30M
Product
49.0%$29M
PRAXPraxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
FY 2024
License
76.8%$9M
Upfront Payment
23.2%$3M

IMUX vs IDYA vs KO vs ARQT vs PRAX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGARQT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

KO and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $49.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IDYA's -62.2%. On growth, ARQT holds the edge at +60.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricIMUX logoIMUXImmunic, Inc.IDYA logoIDYAIDEAYA Bioscience…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$225M$49.3B$416M$0
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$109M-$179M$15.5B$6M-$357M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$104M-$140M$13.7B-$2M-$327M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$81M-$88M$12.6B$27M-$283M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+99.5%+61.7%+90.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-81.4%+29.3%+0.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-62.2%+27.8%-0.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-39.0%+25.5%+6.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%+60.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+56.8%-35.4%+18.2%+55.0%+2.7%
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricIMUX logoIMUXImmunic, Inc.IDYA logoIDYAIDEAYA Bioscience…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
Market CapShares × price$137M$2.5B$355.6B$3.0B$7.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$122M$2.5B$390.8B$3.0B$7.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.22x-22.64x27.18x-187.54x-19.77x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.27x122.45x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue11.64x7.42x8.11x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.51x10.40x16.37x6.83x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF67.15x
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-2 for IMUX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs IMUX's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricIMUX logoIMUXImmunic, Inc.IDYA logoIDYAIDEAYA Bioscience…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.2%-14.0%+41.1%-1.4%-43.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-132.0%-12.8%+13.1%-0.6%-40.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-12.4%+15.8%-5.2%-65.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-17.0%-15.0%+17.3%-4.3%-49.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–914743
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x1.33x0.03x0.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$15M-$85M$35.2B-$37M-$357M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$15M$113M$10.3B$43M$357M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$684,000$28M$45.5B$6M$110,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense10.70x2.08x
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $976 for IMUX. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +491.9% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 164.8% vs IMUX's -6.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricIMUX logoIMUXImmunic, Inc.IDYA logoIDYAIDEAYA Bioscience…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+137.7%-14.4%+20.3%-15.9%-6.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+64.2%+30.1%+17.2%+80.6%+491.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-18.0%+15.0%+47.0%+138.8%+1757.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.2%+31.8%+65.6%-16.2%-14.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%+159.0%+121.1%+11.8%-36.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-6.4%+4.8%+13.7%+33.7%+164.8%
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMUX's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs PRAX's 72.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricIMUX logoIMUXImmunic, Inc.IDYA logoIDYAIDEAYA Bioscience…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.80x1.25x-0.20x1.45x1.55x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$15.77$39.28$84.04$31.77$366.52
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.67$20.50$65.35$12.72$37.19
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+87.9%+73.8%+98.3%+76.7%+72.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.648.860.666.431.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded291K1.3M12.7M1.5M396K
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: IMUX as "Buy", IDYA as "Buy", KO as "Buy", ARQT as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 127.8% upside for PRAX (target: $607) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricIMUX logoIMUXImmunic, Inc.IDYA logoIDYAIDEAYA Bioscience…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…ARQT logoARQTArcutis Biotherap…PRAX logoPRAXPraxis Precision …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$14.50$58.67$86.13$34.00$607.15
# AnalystsCovering analysts1225481216
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises156
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.2%0.0%0.0%
KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns).

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

IMUX vs IDYA vs KO vs ARQT vs PRAX: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is IMUX or IDYA or KO or ARQT or PRAX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, IDEAYA Biosciences, Inc.

(IDYA) is the stronger pick with 30. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 27. 2x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Immunic, Inc. (IMUX) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — IMUX or IDYA or KO or ARQT or PRAX?

On forward P/E, The Coca-Cola Company is actually cheaper at 25.

3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — IMUX or IDYA or KO or ARQT or PRAX?

Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +65.

6%, compared to -90. 2% for Immunic, Inc. (IMUX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IDYA returned +159. 0% versus IMUX's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — IMUX or IDYA or KO or ARQT or PRAX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Immunic, Inc. 's 1. 80β — meaning IMUX is approximately -999% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — IMUX or IDYA or KO or ARQT or PRAX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), IDEAYA Biosciences, Inc.

(IDYA) is pulling ahead at 30. 2% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 88. 8% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — IMUX or IDYA or KO or ARQT or PRAX?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -52. 0% for IDEAYA Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -72. 8% for IDYA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IDYA leads at 97. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is IMUX or IDYA or KO or ARQT or PRAX more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) trades at 25.

3x forward P/E versus 122. 5x for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — 97. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAX: 127. 8% to $607. 15.

08

Which pays a better dividend — IMUX or IDYA or KO or ARQT or PRAX?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield) pays a dividend. IMUX, IDYA, ARQT, PRAX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is IMUX or IDYA or KO or ARQT or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Immunic, Inc. (IMUX) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, IMUX: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between IMUX and IDYA and KO and ARQT and PRAX?

These companies operate in different sectors (IMUX (Healthcare) and IDYA (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and ARQT (Healthcare) and PRAX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: IMUX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IDYA is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. KO pays a dividend while IMUX, IDYA, ARQT, PRAX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.