Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
INAB logo
INAB
ADCT logo
ADCT
KO logo
KO
RCUS logo
RCUS
NKTR logo
NKTR
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

INAB vs ADCT vs KO vs RCUS vs NKTR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
INAB
IN8bio, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6M
5Y Perf.-99.5%
ADCT
ADC Therapeutics S.A.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNYSE • CH
Market Cap$127M
5Y Perf.-95.3%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$345.54B
5Y Perf.+40.8%
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.37B
5Y Perf.-25.0%
NKTR
Nektar Therapeutics

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.18B
5Y Perf.-74.6%

INAB vs ADCT vs KO vs RCUS vs NKTR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
INAB logoINAB
ADCT logoADCT
KO logoKO
RCUS logoRCUS
NKTR logoNKTR
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$6M$127M$345.54B$2.37B$1.18B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$79M$49.28B$236M$56M
Net Income (TTM)$-19M$-137M$13.70B$-369M$-158M
Gross Margin90.7%61.7%90.7%99.4%
Operating Margin-149.6%29.3%-168.6%-224.9%
Forward P/E24.6x
Total Debt$3M$439M$45.49B$99M$149M
Cash & Equiv.$27M$261M$10.27B$222M$15M

INAB vs ADCT vs KO vs RCUS vs NKTRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

INAB
ADCT
KO
RCUS
NKTR
StockJul 21Jun 26Return
IN8bio, Inc. (INAB)1000.5-99.5%
ADC Therapeutics S.… (ADCT)1004.7-95.3%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100140.8+40.8%
Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS)10075.0-25.0%
Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR)10025.4-74.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: INAB vs ADCT vs KO vs RCUS vs NKTR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Nektar Therapeutics is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. INAB also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇KO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
INAB
IN8bio, Inc.
The Growth Leader

INAB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.

  • 32.1% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9%
Best for: growth
ADCT
ADC Therapeutics S.A.
The Growth Play

ADCT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 14.9%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -27.1%
Best for: growth exposure
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Long-Run Compounder

KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 115.4% 10Y total return vs RCUS's 38.5%
  • 27.8% margin vs NKTR's -284.2%
  • 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • 13.1% ROA vs INAB's -80.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs -256.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, RCUS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
NKTR
Nektar Therapeutics
The Income Pick

NKTR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • beta 1.50
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.50, current ratio 4.97x
  • Beta 1.50, current ratio 4.97x
  • Beta 1.50 vs RCUS's 2.00
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthINAB logoINAB32.1% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9%
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs NKTR's -284.2%
Stability / SafetyNKTR logoNKTRBeta 1.50 vs RCUS's 2.00
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NKTR logoNKTR+5.5% vs ADCT's -70.5%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs INAB's -80.2%, ROIC 15.8% vs -256.0%

INAB vs ADCT vs KO vs RCUS vs NKTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

INABIN8bio, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ADCTADC Therapeutics S.A.
FY 2025
Product
90.4%$74M
License Revenues
6.1%$5M
Royalty Revenue
3.4%$3M
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
RCUSArcus Biosciences, Inc.
FY 2025
License And Development Services
87.4%$221M
Development Services
6.7%$17M
R&D Services
3.2%$8M
License
2.8%$7M
NKTRNektar Therapeutics
FY 2025
Non Cash Royalty Revenue Related To Sale Of Future Royalties
99.5%$55M
License Collaboration And Other Revenue
0.5%$300,000

INAB vs ADCT vs KO vs RCUS vs NKTR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGRCUS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

KO and INAB operate at a comparable scale, with $49.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NKTR's -2.8%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricINAB logoINABIN8bio, Inc.ADCT logoADCTADC Therapeutics …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$79M$49.3B$236M$56M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$17M-$117M$15.5B-$391M-$124M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$19M-$137M$13.7B-$369M-$158M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$15M-$115M$12.6B-$489M-$204M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+90.7%+61.7%+90.7%+99.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-149.6%+29.3%-168.6%-2.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-173.0%+27.8%-156.4%-2.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-144.7%+25.5%-2.1%-3.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-9.5%+12.1%-39.3%+3.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.9%+41.7%+18.2%+10.5%+49.7%
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — INAB and ADCT and RCUS each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricINAB logoINABIN8bio, Inc.ADCT logoADCTADC Therapeutics …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…
Market CapShares × price$6M$127M$345.5B$2.4B$1.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$18M$304M$380.8B$2.2B$1.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.31x-0.89x26.41x-7.16x-6.19x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.24.56x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.36x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple25.71x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.56x7.21x9.60x21.32x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.22x10.10x4.01x11.32x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF65.24x
Evenly matched — INAB and ADCT and RCUS each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-96 for INAB. INAB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NKTR's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricINAB logoINABIN8bio, Inc.ADCT logoADCTADC Therapeutics …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-96.4%+41.1%-69.0%-87.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-80.2%-44.7%+13.1%-35.3%-40.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-2.6%+15.8%-64.1%-57.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-84.5%-43.8%+17.3%-42.1%-55.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–954702
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.10x1.33x0.16x1.66x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$24M$178M$35.2B-$123M$134M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$27M$261M$10.3B$222M$15M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3M$439M$45.5B$99M$149M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.72x10.70x-13.38x-4.15x
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KO five years ago would be worth $16,418 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $46 for INAB. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +551.6% total return vs ADCT's -70.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 91.7% vs INAB's -71.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricINAB logoINABIN8bio, Inc.ADCT logoADCTADC Therapeutics …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-43.9%-71.7%+17.7%+1.1%+38.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-37.6%-70.5%+16.8%+159.1%+551.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.6%-56.5%+39.8%+20.5%+604.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.5%-95.7%+64.2%-1.9%-76.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.5%-96.6%+115.4%+38.5%-73.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-71.3%-24.2%+11.8%+6.4%+91.7%
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 2.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs ADCT's 20.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricINAB logoINABIN8bio, Inc.ADCT logoADCTADC Therapeutics …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.89x1.84x-0.20x2.00x1.50x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.73$4.97$84.04$28.72$109.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.17$0.78$65.35$7.91$7.99
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+50.5%+20.0%+95.5%+82.0%+55.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10038.914.853.251.238.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded62K1.8M12.9M1.1M993K
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: ADCT as "Hold", KO as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 251.3% upside for ADCT (target: $4) vs 7.3% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.54% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricINAB logoINABIN8bio, Inc.ADCT logoADCTADC Therapeutics …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…NKTR logoNKTRNektar Therapeuti…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.50$86.13$31.00$149.60
# AnalystsCovering analysts12481833
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises56
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.2%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NKTR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

INAB vs ADCT vs KO vs RCUS vs NKTR: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is INAB or ADCT or KO or RCUS or NKTR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, ADC Therapeutics S.

A. (ADCT) is the stronger pick with 14. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). The Coca-Cola Company (KO) offers the better valuation at 26. 4x trailing P/E (24. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Coca-Cola Company (KO) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — INAB or ADCT or KO or RCUS or NKTR?

Over the past 5 years, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) delivered a total return of +64.

2%, compared to -99. 5% for IN8bio, Inc. (INAB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KO returned +115. 4% versus INAB's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — INAB or ADCT or KO or RCUS or NKTR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 2. 00β — meaning RCUS is approximately -1098% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, IN8bio, Inc. (INAB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 166% for Nektar Therapeutics — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — INAB or ADCT or KO or RCUS or NKTR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ADC Therapeutics S.

A. (ADCT) is pulling ahead at 14. 9% versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ADC Therapeutics S. A. grew EPS 30. 9% year-over-year, compared to -678. 9% for IN8bio, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCUS leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — INAB or ADCT or KO or RCUS or NKTR?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -297. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -236. 8% for NKTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is INAB or ADCT or KO or RCUS or NKTR more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ADCT: 251.

3% to $3. 50.

07

Which pays a better dividend — INAB or ADCT or KO or RCUS or NKTR?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield) pays a dividend. INAB, ADCT, RCUS, NKTR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is INAB or ADCT or KO or RCUS or NKTR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +115. 4% 10Y return). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 4%, RCUS: +38. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between INAB and ADCT and KO and RCUS and NKTR?

These companies operate in different sectors (INAB (Healthcare) and ADCT (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and RCUS (Healthcare) and NKTR (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

KO pays a dividend while INAB, ADCT, RCUS, NKTR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.