Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
INAB vs ADCT vs RCUS vs NKTR vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Banks - Diversified
INAB vs ADCT vs RCUS vs NKTR vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $6M | $127M | $2.37B | $1.18B | $925.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $79M | $236M | $56M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $-137M | $-369M | $-158M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | — | 90.7% | 90.7% | 99.4% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | -149.6% | -168.6% | -224.9% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 14.9x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $439M | $99M | $149M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $261M | $222M | $15M | $343.34B |
INAB vs ADCT vs RCUS vs NKTR vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| IN8bio, Inc. (INAB) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| ADC Therapeutics S.… (ADCT) | 100 | 4.7 | -95.3% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 75.0 | -25.0% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 25.4 | -74.6% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 218.2 | +118.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INAB vs ADCT vs RCUS vs NKTR vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INAB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 32.1% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9%
ADCT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.9%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -27.1%
Among these 5 stocks, RCUS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NKTR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.50, current ratio 4.97x
- Beta 1.50, current ratio 4.97x
- +5.5% vs ADCT's -70.5%
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.8%
- 492.1% 10Y total return vs RCUS's 38.5%
- 20.4% margin vs NKTR's -284.2%
- Beta 0.94 vs RCUS's 2.00
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.1% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs NKTR's -284.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs RCUS's 2.00 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.5% vs ADCT's -70.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs INAB's -80.2%, ROIC 4.5% vs -256.0% |
INAB vs ADCT vs RCUS vs NKTR vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
INAB vs ADCT vs RCUS vs NKTR vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories
NKTR leads 1 • INAB leads 0 • ADCT leads 0 • RCUS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NKTR and JPM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and INAB operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NKTR's -2.8%. On growth, NKTR holds the edge at +3.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $79M | $236M | $56M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$17M | -$117M | -$391M | -$124M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | -$137M | -$369M | -$158M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | -$115M | -$489M | -$204M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +90.7% | +90.7% | +99.4% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -149.6% | -168.6% | -2.2% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -173.0% | -156.4% | -2.8% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -144.7% | -2.1% | -3.7% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -9.5% | -39.3% | +3.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.9% | +41.7% | +10.5% | +49.7% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — INAB and ADCT and RCUS each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $127M | $2.4B | $1.2B | $925.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$18M | $304M | $2.2B | $1.3B | $1.52T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.31x | -0.89x | -7.16x | -6.19x | 16.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 14.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.93x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 18.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.56x | 9.60x | 21.32x | 3.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.22x | — | 4.01x | 11.32x | 2.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 9.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-96 for INAB. INAB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INAB scores 5/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -96.4% | — | -69.0% | -87.0% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -80.2% | -44.7% | -35.3% | -40.7% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.6% | — | -64.1% | -57.2% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -84.5% | -43.8% | -42.1% | -55.7% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | — | 0.16x | 1.66x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$24M | $178M | -$123M | $134M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $261M | $222M | $15M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $439M | $99M | $149M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -1.72x | -13.38x | -4.15x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $22,668 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $46 for INAB. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +551.6% total return vs ADCT's -70.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 91.7% vs INAB's -71.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -43.9% | -71.7% | +1.1% | +38.8% | +2.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -37.6% | -70.5% | +159.1% | +551.6% | +24.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | -56.5% | +20.5% | +604.9% | +141.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | -95.7% | -1.9% | -76.9% | +126.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | -96.6% | +38.5% | -73.2% | +492.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -71.3% | -24.2% | +6.4% | +91.7% | +34.2% |
Risk & Volatility
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 2.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs ADCT's 20.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.89x | 1.84x | 2.00x | 1.50x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.73 | $4.97 | $28.72 | $109.00 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.17 | $0.78 | $7.91 | $7.99 | $266.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.5% | +20.0% | +82.0% | +55.3% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.9 | 14.8 | 51.2 | 38.6 | 63.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 62K | 1.8M | 1.1M | 993K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ADCT as "Hold", RCUS as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 251.3% upside for ADCT (target: $4) vs 2.6% for JPM (target: $340). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.80% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.50 | $31.00 | $149.60 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 18 | 33 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.7% |
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). NKTR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
INAB vs ADCT vs RCUS vs NKTR vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INAB or ADCT or RCUS or NKTR or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ADC Therapeutics S.
A. (ADCT) is the stronger pick with 14. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 5x trailing P/E (14. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — INAB or ADCT or RCUS or NKTR or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +126. 7%, compared to -99. 5% for IN8bio, Inc. (INAB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +492. 1% versus INAB's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — INAB or ADCT or RCUS or NKTR or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 2. 00β — meaning RCUS is approximately 112% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, IN8bio, Inc. (INAB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — INAB or ADCT or RCUS or NKTR or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ADC Therapeutics S.
A. (ADCT) is pulling ahead at 14. 9% versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ADC Therapeutics S. A. grew EPS 30. 9% year-over-year, compared to -678. 9% for IN8bio, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCUS leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — INAB or ADCT or RCUS or NKTR or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -297. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -236. 8% for NKTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is INAB or ADCT or RCUS or NKTR or JPM more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ADCT: 251.
3% to $3. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — INAB or ADCT or RCUS or NKTR or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. INAB, ADCT, RCUS, NKTR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is INAB or ADCT or RCUS or NKTR or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 8% yield, +492. 1% 10Y return). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +492. 1%, RCUS: +38. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between INAB and ADCT and RCUS and NKTR and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (INAB (Healthcare) and ADCT (Healthcare) and RCUS (Healthcare) and NKTR (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: INAB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ADCT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while INAB, ADCT, RCUS, NKTR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.