Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
INBK vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
INBK vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $222M | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $323M | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-35M | $382M |
| Gross Margin | 13.7% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | -15.8% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 11.4x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $355M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $457M | $599M |
INBK vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Internet Banc… (INBK) | 100 | 158.7 | +58.7% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INBK vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INBK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 15.5% 10Y total return vs FIS's -13.2%
- +18.3% vs FIS's -35.3%
FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.5%
- Rev growth 5.4%, EPS growth -47.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 0.59x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.4% revenue growth vs INBK's -3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 11.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.5% margin vs INBK's -10.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs INBK's 1.01, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs INBK's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.3% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.1% ROA vs INBK's -0.6%, ROIC 6.0% vs -5.1% |
INBK vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
INBK vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 33.7x INBK's $323M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 3.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INBK's -10.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $323M | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$46M | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$35M | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.8% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.9% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.7% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
INBK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $222M | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $121M | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.33x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.38x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.69x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.62x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.81x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FIS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIS delivers a 2.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-9 for INBK. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INBK's 0.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FIS scores 6/9 vs INBK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.4% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.1% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.6% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.99x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$102M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $457M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $355M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.25x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INBK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INBK five years ago would be worth $7,745 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, INBK leads with a +18.3% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INBK at 33.9% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.2% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.3% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +139.9% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.6% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.5% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.9% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INBK and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FIS is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INBK's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INBK currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.51 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.05 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.5% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.8 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 59K | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
FIS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates INBK as "Hold" and FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 3.8% for INBK (target: $27). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs INBK's 0.94%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $26.50 | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.24 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% |
FIS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). INBK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
INBK vs FIS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INBK or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the stronger pick with 5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for First Internet Bancorp (INBK). Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the better valuation at 63. 0x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INBK or FIS?
On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 7. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INBK or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, First Internet Bancorp (INBK) delivered a total return of -22.
6%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INBK returned +15. 5% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INBK or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus First Internet Bancorp's 1. 01β — meaning INBK is approximately 34% more volatile than FIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 99% for First Internet Bancorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INBK or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is pulling ahead at 5. 4% versus -3. 2% for First Internet Bancorp (INBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. grew EPS -47. 2% year-over-year, compared to -239. 9% for First Internet Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INBK or FIS?
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 6% net margin versus -10. 9% for First Internet Bancorp — meaning it keeps 3. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FIS leads at 16. 5% versus -15. 8% for INBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FIS leads at 36. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INBK or FIS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 4x for First Internet Bancorp — 3. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — INBK or FIS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 0. 9% for First Internet Bancorp (INBK).
09Is INBK or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FIS: -13. 2%, INBK: +15. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INBK and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (INBK (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: INBK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare FIS vs JKHY
JKHY is one of the most direct listed alternatives to FIS.
Compare INBK vs SOFI
SOFI overlaps with INBK in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With JKHY + FISV
JKHY and FISV are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.