Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
INBX vs DBVT vs IMVT vs ALKS vs ABBV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
INBX vs DBVT vs IMVT vs ALKS vs ABBV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $1.96B | $1690.08T | $5.88B | $5.83B | $356.49B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $0.00 | $0.00 | $1.56B | $61.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-140M | $-168M | $-464M | $153M | $4.23B |
| Gross Margin | -47.6% | — | — | 65.4% | 70.2% |
| Operating Margin | -103.9% | — | — | 12.3% | 26.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 24.5x | 14.2x |
| Total Debt | $107M | $22M | $98K | $70M | $69.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $124M | $194M | $714M | $1.12B | $5.23B |
INBX vs DBVT vs IMVT vs ALKS vs ABBV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inhibrx Biosciences… (INBX) | 100 | 768.2 | +668.2% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 91.3 | -8.7% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 85.2 | -14.8% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 211.5 | +111.5% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 210.5 | +110.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INBX vs DBVT vs IMVT vs ALKS vs ABBV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INBX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs ABBV's 293.8%
- 5.5% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
- +10.9% vs ABBV's +12.2%
DBVT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.36, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
- Beta 1.36, current ratio 11.16x
ALKS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.
- 9.8% margin vs INBX's -107.7%
- 5.4% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0%
ABBV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 3.3%
- Rev growth 8.6%, EPS growth -0.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.8%
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.28 vs INBX's 1.99
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.5% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.8% margin vs INBX's -107.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs INBX's 1.99 | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.9% vs ABBV's +12.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.4% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
INBX vs DBVT vs IMVT vs ALKS vs ABBV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
INBX vs DBVT vs IMVT vs ALKS vs ABBV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABBV leads in 2 of 6 categories
ALKS leads 2 • INBX leads 1 • DBVT leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $61.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALKS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INBX's -107.7%. On growth, ALKS holds the edge at +28.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $0 | $0 | $1.6B | $61.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$133M | -$112M | -$487M | $212M | $24.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$140M | -$168M | -$464M | $153M | $4.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$130M | -$151M | -$423M | $392M | $18.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -47.6% | — | — | +65.4% | +70.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -103.9% | — | — | +12.3% | +26.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -107.7% | — | — | +9.8% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -99.9% | — | — | +25.1% | +30.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | — | — | +28.2% | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.3% | +91.5% | +19.7% | -4.1% | +57.4% |
Valuation Metrics
ALKS leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.5x trailing earnings, ALKS trades at a 71% valuation discount to ABBV's 85.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ABBV's 14.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALKS's 17.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $1690.08T | $5.9B | $5.8B | $356.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $1690.08T | $5.2B | $4.8B | $420.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -14.86x | -0.75x | -10.60x | 24.47x | 85.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 14.17x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 17.01x | 14.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1506.58x | — | — | 3.95x | 5.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 260.31x | 0.65x | 6.20x | 3.25x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 12.14x | 20.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-3 for INBX. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INBX's 13.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | -130.2% | -47.1% | +8.8% | +62.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -71.9% | -89.0% | -44.1% | +5.4% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — | — | +18.9% | +23.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -106.9% | -145.7% | -66.1% | +14.2% | +21.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 13.39x | 0.13x | 0.00x | 0.04x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$17M | -$172M | -$714M | -$1.0B | $63.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $124M | $194M | $714M | $1.1B | $5.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $107M | $22M | $98,000 | $70M | $69.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -189.82x | — | 32.30x | 3.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INBX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INBX five years ago would be worth $91,290 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,172 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, INBX leads with a +1093.2% total return vs ABBV's +12.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INBX at 72.3% vs ALKS's 4.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +79.0% | +3.6% | +11.7% | +23.8% | -10.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1093.2% | +100.5% | +102.4% | +15.2% | +12.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +411.2% | +18.1% | +49.8% | +13.2% | +49.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +812.9% | -68.3% | +84.4% | +61.7% | +99.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +555.4% | -87.1% | +190.9% | -12.0% | +293.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +72.3% | +5.7% | +14.4% | +4.2% | +14.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IMVT and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INBX's 1.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs DBVT's 75.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.99x | 1.26x | 1.36x | 1.00x | 0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $155.29 | $26.18 | $30.09 | $36.60 | $244.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.84 | $7.53 | $13.36 | $25.17 | $176.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.5% | +75.3% | +96.2% | +95.6% | +82.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.7 | 47.4 | 50.6 | 60.5 | 43.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 340K | 252K | 1.4M | 2.2M | 5.8M |
Analyst Outlook
ABBV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INBX as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 134.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 27.4% for ABBV (target: $257). ABBV is the only dividend payer here at 3.26% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 | $45.50 | $46.00 | $256.69 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 15 | 23 | 28 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +3.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $6.57 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | +0.3% |
ABBV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). ALKS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
INBX vs DBVT vs IMVT vs ALKS vs ABBV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INBX or DBVT or IMVT or ALKS or ABBV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Inhibrx Biosciences, Inc.
(INBX) is the stronger pick with 550. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). Alkermes plc (ALKS) offers the better valuation at 24. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Inhibrx Biosciences, Inc. (INBX) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INBX or DBVT or IMVT or ALKS or ABBV?
On trailing P/E, Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the cheapest at 24.
5x versus AbbVie Inc. at 85. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INBX or DBVT or IMVT or ALKS or ABBV?
Over the past 5 years, Inhibrx Biosciences, Inc.
(INBX) delivered a total return of +812. 9%, compared to -68. 3% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INBX returned +555. 4% versus DBVT's -87. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INBX or DBVT or IMVT or ALKS or ABBV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Inhibrx Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 99β — meaning INBX is approximately 623% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 13% for Inhibrx Biosciences, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INBX or DBVT or IMVT or ALKS or ABBV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Inhibrx Biosciences, Inc.
(INBX) is pulling ahead at 550. 0% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AbbVie Inc. grew EPS -0. 8% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALKS leads at 9. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INBX or DBVT or IMVT or ALKS or ABBV?
Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
4% net margin versus -107. 7% for Inhibrx Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus -103. 9% for INBX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INBX or DBVT or IMVT or ALKS or ABBV more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 134.
8% to $46. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — INBX or DBVT or IMVT or ALKS or ABBV?
In this comparison, ABBV (3.
3% yield) pays a dividend. INBX, DBVT, IMVT, ALKS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is INBX or DBVT or IMVT or ALKS or ABBV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 3. 3% yield, +293. 8% 10Y return). Inhibrx Biosciences, Inc. (INBX) carries a higher beta of 1. 99 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +293. 8%, INBX: +555. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INBX and DBVT and IMVT and ALKS and ABBV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: INBX is a small-cap high-growth stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock. ABBV pays a dividend while INBX, DBVT, IMVT, ALKS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.