Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

INFU vs ACLX vs LEGN vs BRT vs FATE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
INFU
InfuSystem Holdings, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareAMEX • US
Market Cap$170M
5Y Perf.-26.8%
ACLX
Arcellx, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.73B
5Y Perf.+499.9%
LEGN
Legend Biotech Corporation

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.19B
5Y Perf.-29.0%
BRT
BRT Apartments Corp.

REIT - Residential

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$276M
5Y Perf.-33.4%
FATE
Fate Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$276M
5Y Perf.-93.1%

INFU vs ACLX vs LEGN vs BRT vs FATE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
INFU logoINFU
ACLX logoACLX
LEGN logoLEGN
BRT logoBRT
FATE logoFATE
IndustryMedical - Instruments & SuppliesBiotechnologyBiotechnologyREIT - ResidentialBiotechnology
Market Cap$170M$6.73B$5.19B$276M$276M
Revenue (TTM)$142M$22M$1.03B$98M$7M
Net Income (TTM)$8M$-229M$-297M$-12M$-136M
Gross Margin56.7%-64.8%60.3%40.7%
Operating Margin9.1%-11.4%-13.2%6.1%-22.2%
Forward P/E19.8x116.2x
Total Debt$3M$96M$414M$508M$78M
Cash & Equiv.$3M$80M$902M$25M$47M

INFU vs ACLX vs LEGN vs BRT vs FATELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

INFU
ACLX
LEGN
BRT
FATE
StockFeb 22May 26Return
InfuSystem Holdings… (INFU)10073.2-26.8%
Arcellx, Inc. (ACLX)100599.9+499.9%
Legend Biotech Corp… (LEGN)10071.0-29.0%
BRT Apartments Corp. (BRT)10066.6-33.4%
Fate Therapeutics, … (FATE)1006.9-93.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: INFU vs ACLX vs LEGN vs BRT vs FATE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: INFU leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. BRT Apartments Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. LEGN and FATE also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
INFU
InfuSystem Holdings, Inc.
The Value Play

INFU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Better valuation composite
  • 5.6% margin vs FATE's -20.5%
  • 7.9% ROA vs FATE's -42.7%, ROIC 12.5% vs -36.5%
Best for: value and quality
ACLX
Arcellx, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

ACLX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 5.8% 10Y total return vs BRT's 217.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
LEGN
Legend Biotech Corporation
The Growth Play

LEGN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 64.5%, EPS growth -66.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 106.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 41.3%, current ratio 1.96x
  • Beta 0.76, current ratio 1.96x
  • 64.5% revenue growth vs ACLX's -79.4%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
BRT
BRT Apartments Corp.
The Real Estate Income Play

BRT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 7.2%
  • Beta 0.60 vs FATE's 1.99
  • 7.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
FATE
Fate Therapeutics, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

FATE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +132.0% vs LEGN's -12.2%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLEGN logoLEGN64.5% revenue growth vs ACLX's -79.4%
ValueINFU logoINFUBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsINFU logoINFU5.6% margin vs FATE's -20.5%
Stability / SafetyBRT logoBRTBeta 0.60 vs FATE's 1.99
DividendsBRT logoBRT7.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FATE logoFATE+132.0% vs LEGN's -12.2%
Efficiency (ROA)INFU logoINFU7.9% ROA vs FATE's -42.7%, ROIC 12.5% vs -36.5%

INFU vs ACLX vs LEGN vs BRT vs FATE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

INFUInfuSystem Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Patient Services
57.4%$87M
Device Solutions
42.6%$64M
ACLXArcellx, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

LEGNLegend Biotech Corporation
FY 2021
Licensing Of Intellectual Property
100.0%$5M
BRTBRT Apartments Corp.
FY 2017
Multi Family Real Estate Segment
97.3%$103M
Other Real Estate Segment
2.7%$3M
FATEFate Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2023
Upfront Fee And Equity Premium
100.0%$31M

INFU vs ACLX vs LEGN vs BRT vs FATE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLINFULAGGINGFATE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

INFU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

LEGN is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 155.0x FATE's $7M. INFU is the more profitable business, keeping 5.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FATE's -20.5%. On growth, LEGN holds the edge at +64.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricINFU logoINFUInfuSystem Holdin…ACLX logoACLXArcellx, Inc.LEGN logoLEGNLegend Biotech Co…BRT logoBRTBRT Apartments Co…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$142M$22M$1.0B$98M$7M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$26M-$246M-$107M$33M-$148M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$8M-$229M-$297M-$12M-$136M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$20M-$213M-$231M$13M-$88M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+56.7%-64.8%+60.3%+40.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+9.1%-11.4%-13.2%+6.1%-22.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+5.6%-10.3%-28.8%-12.5%-20.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+14.3%-9.5%-22.4%+13.0%-13.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.0%-89.2%+64.9%+4.2%-26.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.9%-13.6%-2.2%-16.7%+38.6%
INFU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

INFU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, INFU's 6.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BRT's 20.3x.

MetricINFU logoINFUInfuSystem Holdin…ACLX logoACLXArcellx, Inc.LEGN logoLEGNLegend Biotech Co…BRT logoBRTBRT Apartments Co…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
Market CapShares × price$170M$6.7B$5.2B$276M$276M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$170M$6.7B$4.7B$759M$307M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS27.13x-28.27x-8.73x-22.21x-2.08x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.79x116.25x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.75x20.29x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.18x302.09x5.03x2.84x41.49x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.10x16.10x2.59x1.49x1.37x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF7.12x41.53x
INFU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

INFU leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

INFU delivers a 14.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-66 for FATE. INFU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BRT's 2.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INFU scores 8/9 vs ACLX's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricINFU logoINFUInfuSystem Holdin…ACLX logoACLXArcellx, Inc.LEGN logoLEGNLegend Biotech Co…BRT logoBRTBRT Apartments Co…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+14.0%-55.4%-29.2%-6.8%-65.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+7.9%-36.2%-17.6%-1.7%-42.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+12.5%-46.2%-12.7%+1.3%-36.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+14.3%-46.6%-11.0%+1.6%-43.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–981232
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.06x0.24x0.41x2.87x0.38x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$241,000$16M-$488M$483M$31M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3M$80M$902M$25M$47M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3M$96M$414M$508M$78M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense15.54x-8.45x-12.69x0.51x
INFU leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ACLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ACLX five years ago would be worth $68,494 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $316 for FATE. Over the past 12 months, FATE leads with a +132.0% total return vs LEGN's -12.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACLX at 38.6% vs LEGN's -25.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricINFU logoINFUInfuSystem Holdin…ACLX logoACLXArcellx, Inc.LEGN logoLEGNLegend Biotech Co…BRT logoBRTBRT Apartments Co…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+0.2%+81.7%+30.7%+3.1%+141.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+53.7%+104.5%-12.2%+1.8%+132.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-3.6%+166.2%-59.1%+0.6%-56.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-55.3%+584.9%-4.2%+10.9%-96.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+143.1%+584.9%-24.0%+217.1%+38.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-1.2%+38.6%-25.8%+0.2%-24.0%
ACLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

ACLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

ACLX is the less volatile stock with a -0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FATE's 1.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACLX currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs LEGN's 62.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricINFU logoINFUInfuSystem Holdin…ACLX logoACLXArcellx, Inc.LEGN logoLEGNLegend Biotech Co…BRT logoBRTBRT Apartments Co…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.38x-0.49x0.76x0.60x1.99x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.04$115.13$45.30$16.69$2.46
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.08$50.85$16.24$13.18$0.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+76.2%+99.9%+62.1%+87.8%+97.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10037.479.974.862.182.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded125K1.4M1.9M54K1.9M
ACLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: INFU as "Buy", ACLX as "Hold", LEGN as "Buy", BRT as "Buy", FATE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1552.7% upside for FATE (target: $40) vs -2.3% for ACLX (target: $112). BRT is the only dividend payer here at 7.16% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricINFU logoINFUInfuSystem Holdin…ACLX logoACLXArcellx, Inc.LEGN logoLEGNLegend Biotech Co…BRT logoBRTBRT Apartments Co…FATE logoFATEFate Therapeutics…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$15.00$112.45$57.89$21.00$39.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts31819531
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+7.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.05
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+6.5%0.0%0.0%+1.8%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

INFU leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ACLX leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallInfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

INFU vs ACLX vs LEGN vs BRT vs FATE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is INFU or ACLX or LEGN or BRT or FATE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) is the stronger pick with 64.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -79. 4% for Arcellx, Inc. (ACLX). InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU) offers the better valuation at 27. 1x trailing P/E (19. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — INFU or ACLX or LEGN or BRT or FATE?

On forward P/E, InfuSystem Holdings, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 19. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — INFU or ACLX or LEGN or BRT or FATE?

Over the past 5 years, Arcellx, Inc.

(ACLX) delivered a total return of +584. 9%, compared to -96. 8% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACLX returned +584. 9% versus LEGN's -24. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — INFU or ACLX or LEGN or BRT or FATE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arcellx, Inc.

(ACLX) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 49β versus Fate Therapeutics, Inc. 's 1. 99β — meaning FATE is approximately -506% more volatile than ACLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (INFU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 3% for BRT Apartments Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — INFU or ACLX or LEGN or BRT or FATE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Legend Biotech Corporation (LEGN) is pulling ahead at 64.

5% versus -79. 4% for Arcellx, Inc. (ACLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 181. 8% year-over-year, compared to -103. 5% for Arcellx, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LEGN leads at 106. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — INFU or ACLX or LEGN or BRT or FATE?

InfuSystem Holdings, Inc.

(INFU) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus -20. 5% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BRT leads at 11. 4% versus -22. 2% for FATE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACLX leads at 70. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is INFU or ACLX or LEGN or BRT or FATE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, InfuSystem Holdings, Inc.

(INFU) trades at 19. 8x forward P/E versus 116. 2x for Legend Biotech Corporation — 96. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FATE: 1552. 7% to $39. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — INFU or ACLX or LEGN or BRT or FATE?

In this comparison, BRT (7.

2% yield) pays a dividend. INFU, ACLX, LEGN, FATE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is INFU or ACLX or LEGN or BRT or FATE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Arcellx, Inc.

(ACLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 49), +584. 9% 10Y return). Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE) carries a higher beta of 1. 99 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACLX: +584. 9%, FATE: +38. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between INFU and ACLX and LEGN and BRT and FATE?

These companies operate in different sectors (INFU (Healthcare) and ACLX (Healthcare) and LEGN (Healthcare) and BRT (Real Estate) and FATE (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: INFU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LEGN is a small-cap high-growth stock; BRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FATE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. BRT pays a dividend while INFU, ACLX, LEGN, FATE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

INFU

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACLX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LEGN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 32%
  • Gross Margin > 36%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BRT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 24%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FATE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform INFU and ACLX and LEGN and BRT and FATE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(INFU: -3.0% · ACLX: -89.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.