INFY vs CTSH

For growth investors, Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH) is the stronger pick with 7.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 9% for Infosys Limited (INFY). Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH) offers the better valuation at 11. 4x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Infosys Limited (INFY) a "Hold" — based on 40 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH) is the cheapest at 11.

4x versus Infosys Limited at 16. 6x. On forward P/E, Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation wins at 0. 75x versus Infosys Limited's 2. 47x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Infosys Limited (INFY) delivered a total return of -19.

0%, compared to -22. 9% for Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INFY returned +73. 6% versus CTSH's +0. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

75β versus Infosys Limited's 0. 83β — meaning INFY is approximately 10% more volatile than CTSH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Infosys Limited (INFY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 10% for Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH) is pulling ahead at 7.

0% versus 3. 9% for Infosys Limited (INFY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation grew EPS 0. 9% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Infosys Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, INFY leads at 5. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Infosys Limited (INFY) is the more profitable company, earning 16.

4% net margin versus 10. 6% for Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INFY leads at 21. 1% versus 16. 7% for CTSH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTSH leads at 33. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Infosys Limited's 2. 47x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 16. 5x for Infosys Limited — 7. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CTSH: 60. 4% to $83. 33.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Infosys Limited (INFY) offers the highest yield at 4. 6%, versus 2. 4% for Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

75), 2. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTSH: +0. 0%, INFY: +73. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.