INGM vs AVT

For growth investors, Ingram Micro Holding Corporation (INGM) is the stronger pick with 9.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Avnet, Inc. (AVT). Ingram Micro Holding Corporation (INGM) offers the better valuation at 19. 3x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ingram Micro Holding Corporation (INGM) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Ingram Micro Holding Corporation (INGM) is the cheapest at 19.

3x versus Avnet, Inc. at 29. 4x. On forward P/E, Ingram Micro Holding Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 4x.

Over the past 5 years, Avnet, Inc.

(AVT) delivered a total return of +94. 1%, compared to +10. 8% for Ingram Micro Holding Corporation (INGM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AVT returned +132. 4% versus INGM's +10. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Avnet, Inc.

(AVT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 27β versus Ingram Micro Holding Corporation's 1. 54β — meaning INGM is approximately 22% more volatile than AVT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ingram Micro Holding Corporation (INGM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 57% for Avnet, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ingram Micro Holding Corporation (INGM) is pulling ahead at 9.

5% versus -6. 6% for Avnet, Inc. (AVT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ingram Micro Holding Corporation grew EPS 17. 8% year-over-year, compared to -49. 4% for Avnet, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INGM leads at 1. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Avnet, Inc.

(AVT) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 1% net margin versus 0. 6% for Ingram Micro Holding Corporation — meaning it keeps 1. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVT leads at 2. 8% versus 1. 8% for INGM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVT leads at 10. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Ingram Micro Holding Corporation (INGM) trades at 8.

4x forward P/E versus 16. 2x for Avnet, Inc. — 7. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INGM: 7. 2% to $28. 80.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Avnet, Inc. (AVT) offers the highest yield at 1. 6%, versus 1. 2% for Ingram Micro Holding Corporation (INGM).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Avnet, Inc.

(AVT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 27), 1. 6% yield, +132. 4% 10Y return). Ingram Micro Holding Corporation (INGM) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AVT: +132. 4%, INGM: +10. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.