INHD
Inno Holdings Inc.
Steel
Market Cap$14M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
INHD vs CLPS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
Information Technology Services
Market Cap$26M
5Y Perf.-11.1%
INHD vs CLPS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | INHD | CLPS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Steel | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $14M | $26M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $299M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-4M |
| Gross Margin | 2.1% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | -83.6% | -1.4% |
| Total Debt | $50K | $34M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $28M |
INHD vs CLPS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
INHD
CLPS
| Stock | Dec 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inno Holdings Inc. (INHD) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 88.9 | -11.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INHD vs CLPS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CLPS leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Inno Holdings Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
INHD
Inno Holdings Inc.
The Growth Play
INHD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 5.8%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.2%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.85, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 29.49x
- Beta -0.85, current ratio 29.49x
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
The Long-Run Compounder
CLPS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -78.1% 10Y total return vs INHD's -100.0%
- -1.3% margin vs INHD's -86.8%
- 14.3% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | INHD | 5.8% revenue growth vs CLPS's 15.2% |
| Quality / Margins | CLPS | -1.3% margin vs INHD's -86.8% |
| Stability / Safety | INHD | Lower D/E ratio (0.3% vs 58.8%) |
| Dividends | CLPS | 14.3% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CLPS | -3.4% vs INHD's -99.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CLPS | -3.2% ROA vs INHD's -13.3%, ROIC -7.9% vs -99.5% |
INHD vs CLPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
INHD vs CLPS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCLPSLAGGINGINHD
INHDInno Holdings Inc.
0leads
CLPSCLPS Incorporation
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs INHDMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CLPS4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CLPS3/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CLPS6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLPS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $299M annually — 65.6x INHD's $5M. CLPS is the more profitable business, keeping -1.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INHD's -86.8%. On growth, INHD holds the edge at +94.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | INHDInno Holdings Inc. | CLPSCLPS Incorporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $299M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | -$1M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +22.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -83.6% | -1.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -86.8% | -1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | -2.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +94.9% | +15.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +92.7% | +75.8% |
CLPS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CLPS leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | INHDInno Holdings Inc. | CLPSCLPS Incorporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $26M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $32M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.33x | -3.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.00x | 0.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.62x | 0.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
CLPS leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — INHD and CLPS each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLPS delivers a -6.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-14 for INHD. INHD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLPS's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INHD scores 6/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | INHDInno Holdings Inc. | CLPSCLPS Incorporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.5% | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -13.3% | -3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -99.5% | -7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -47.4% | -9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $28M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $50,000 | $34M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Evenly matched — INHD and CLPS each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLPS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLPS five years ago would be worth $3,231 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for INHD. Over the past 12 months, CLPS leads with a -3.4% total return vs INHD's -99.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLPS at 0.7% vs INHD's -97.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | INHDInno Holdings Inc. | CLPSCLPS Incorporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -93.3% | -8.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.9% | -3.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +2.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -67.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -78.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -97.0% | +0.7% |
CLPS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INHD and CLPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INHD is the less volatile stock with a -0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLPS's 0.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLPS currently trades 49.2% from its 52-week high vs INHD's 0.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | INHDInno Holdings Inc. | CLPSCLPS Incorporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.85x | 0.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9494.40 | $1.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.38 | $0.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.0% | +49.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 24.1 | 47.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 15K |
Evenly matched — INHD and CLPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 14.30% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | INHDInno Holdings Inc. | CLPSCLPS Incorporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +14.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
CLPS leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
Best OverallCLPS Incorporation (CLPS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
INHD vs CLPS: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — INHD or CLPS?
Over the past 5 years, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) delivered a total return of -67.
7%, compared to -100. 0% for Inno Holdings Inc. (INHD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLPS returned -78. 1% versus INHD's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — INHD or CLPS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Inno Holdings Inc.
(INHD) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 85β versus CLPS Incorporation's 0. 27β — meaning CLPS is approximately -132% more volatile than INHD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Inno Holdings Inc. (INHD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 59% for CLPS Incorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
03Which is growing faster — INHD or CLPS?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Inno Holdings Inc.
grew EPS 17. 6% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLPS leads at 2. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — INHD or CLPS?
CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the more profitable company, earning -4.
3% net margin versus -248. 7% for Inno Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps -4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLPS leads at -4. 0% versus -153. 3% for INHD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLPS leads at 20. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — INHD or CLPS?
In this comparison, CLPS (14.
3% yield) pays a dividend. INHD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is INHD or CLPS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Inno Holdings Inc.
(INHD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 85)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INHD: -100. 0%, CLPS: -78. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between INHD and CLPS?
These companies operate in different sectors (INHD (Basic Materials) and CLPS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: INHD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock. CLPS pays a dividend while INHD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(INHD: 94.9% · CLPS: 15.3%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.