Steel
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
INHD vs CNET
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Advertising Agencies
INHD vs CNET — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Steel | Advertising Agencies |
| Market Cap | $14M | $2M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $6M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-2M |
| Gross Margin | 2.1% | 4.8% |
| Operating Margin | -83.6% | -31.7% |
| Total Debt | $50K | $122K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $812K |
INHD vs CNET — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inno Holdings Inc. (INHD) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| ZW Data Action Tech… (CNET) | 100 | 22.5 | -77.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INHD vs CNET
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INHD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 5.8%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.2%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.85, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 29.49x
- Beta -0.85, current ratio 29.49x
CNET is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -97.8% 10Y total return vs INHD's -100.0%
- -33.4% margin vs INHD's -86.8%
- -53.6% vs INHD's -99.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.8% revenue growth vs CNET's -49.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | -33.4% margin vs INHD's -86.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (0.3% vs 3.3%) | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -53.6% vs INHD's -99.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -13.3% ROA vs CNET's -21.3%, ROIC -99.5% vs -64.7% |
INHD vs CNET — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
INHD vs CNET — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNET leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNET and INHD operate at a comparable scale, with $6M and $5M in trailing revenue. CNET is the more profitable business, keeping -33.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INHD's -86.8%. On growth, INHD holds the edge at +94.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $6M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | -$2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +4.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -83.6% | -31.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -86.8% | -33.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | -27.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +94.9% | -47.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +92.7% | +95.7% |
Valuation Metrics
CNET leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $2M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $1M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.33x | -0.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.00x | 0.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.62x | 0.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
INHD leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INHD delivers a -13.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-14 in annual profit, vs $-60 for CNET. INHD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNET's 0.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INHD scores 6/9 vs CNET's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.5% | -60.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -13.3% | -21.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -99.5% | -64.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -47.4% | -73.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | -$690,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $812,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $50,000 | $122,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CNET leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CNET five years ago would be worth $219 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for INHD. Over the past 12 months, CNET leads with a -53.6% total return vs INHD's -99.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CNET at -51.0% vs INHD's -97.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -93.3% | -40.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.9% | -53.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -88.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -97.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -97.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -97.0% | -51.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INHD and CNET each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INHD is the less volatile stock with a -0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CNET's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CNET currently trades 26.9% from its 52-week high vs INHD's 0.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.85x | 1.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9494.40 | $2.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.38 | $0.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.0% | +26.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 24.1 | 51.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 11K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CNET leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). INHD leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
INHD vs CNET: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — INHD or CNET?
Over the past 5 years, ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
(CNET) delivered a total return of -97. 8%, compared to -100. 0% for Inno Holdings Inc. (INHD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CNET returned -97. 8% versus INHD's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — INHD or CNET?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Inno Holdings Inc.
(INHD) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 85β versus ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. 's 1. 18β — meaning CNET is approximately -239% more volatile than INHD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Inno Holdings Inc. (INHD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
03Which is growing faster — INHD or CNET?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Inno Holdings Inc.
grew EPS 17. 6% year-over-year, compared to -124. 1% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INHD leads at -14. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — INHD or CNET?
ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
(CNET) is the more profitable company, earning -24. 4% net margin versus -248. 7% for Inno Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps -24. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CNET leads at -24. 3% versus -153. 3% for INHD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CNET leads at 2. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — INHD or CNET?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is INHD or CNET better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Inno Holdings Inc.
(INHD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 85)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INHD: -100. 0%, CNET: -97. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between INHD and CNET?
These companies operate in different sectors (INHD (Basic Materials) and CNET (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.