Steel
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
INHD vs RETO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction Materials
INHD vs RETO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Steel | Construction Materials |
| Market Cap | $14M | $356K |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $9M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-25M |
| Gross Margin | 2.1% | 14.0% |
| Operating Margin | -83.6% | -237.8% |
| Total Debt | $50K | $110K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $671K |
INHD vs RETO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inno Holdings Inc. (INHD) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| ReTo Eco-Solutions,… (RETO) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INHD vs RETO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INHD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.8%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.2%
- -100.0% 10Y total return vs RETO's -100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.85, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 29.49x
RETO is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- -96.1% vs INHD's -99.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.8% revenue growth vs RETO's -43.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | -86.8% margin vs RETO's -291.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (0.3% vs 0.4%) | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -96.1% vs INHD's -99.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -13.3% ROA vs RETO's -75.1%, ROIC -99.5% vs -14.5% |
INHD vs RETO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
INHD vs RETO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — INHD and RETO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RETO is the larger business by revenue, generating $9M annually — 1.9x INHD's $5M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -86.8% (INHD) to -2.9% (RETO). On growth, INHD holds the edge at +94.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $9M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | -$19M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$25M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +14.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -83.6% | -2.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -86.8% | -2.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | -77.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +94.9% | +49.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +92.7% | +98.8% |
Valuation Metrics
RETO leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $356,458 |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | -$205,297 |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.33x | -0.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.00x | 0.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.62x | 0.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
INHD leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INHD delivers a -13.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-14 in annual profit, vs $-183 for RETO. INHD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RETO's 0.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INHD scores 6/9 vs RETO's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.5% | -183.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -13.3% | -75.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -99.5% | -14.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -47.4% | -21.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | -$561,755 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $671,355 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $50,000 | $109,600 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -31.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RETO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RETO five years ago would be worth $1 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for INHD. Over the past 12 months, RETO leads with a -96.1% total return vs INHD's -99.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RETO at -92.0% vs INHD's -97.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -93.3% | -66.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.9% | -96.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -100.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -97.0% | -92.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INHD and RETO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INHD is the less volatile stock with a -0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RETO's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RETO currently trades 3.3% from its 52-week high vs INHD's 0.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.85x | 1.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9494.40 | $19.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.38 | $0.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.0% | +3.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 24.1 | 40.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RETO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). INHD leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
INHD vs RETO: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — INHD or RETO?
Over the past 5 years, ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
(RETO) delivered a total return of -100. 0%, compared to -100. 0% for Inno Holdings Inc. (INHD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INHD returned -100. 0% versus RETO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — INHD or RETO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Inno Holdings Inc.
(INHD) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 85β versus ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning RETO is approximately -309% more volatile than INHD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Inno Holdings Inc. (INHD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 0% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
03Which is growing faster — INHD or RETO?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc.
grew EPS 68. 0% year-over-year, compared to 17. 6% for Inno Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INHD leads at -14. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — INHD or RETO?
Inno Holdings Inc.
(INHD) is the more profitable company, earning -248. 7% net margin versus -456. 7% for ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps -248. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INHD leads at -153. 3% versus -225. 9% for RETO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RETO leads at 45. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — INHD or RETO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is INHD or RETO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Inno Holdings Inc.
(INHD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 85)). ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INHD: -100. 0%, RETO: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between INHD and RETO?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.