Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
INMD vs STAA vs LNTH vs NVCR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
INMD vs STAA vs LNTH vs NVCR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $882M | $1.35B | $5.92B | $1.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $375M | $239M | $1.55B | $674M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $87M | $-80M | $279M | $-173M |
| Gross Margin | 77.8% | 75.6% | 60.5% | 75.2% |
| Operating Margin | 21.3% | -33.3% | 18.8% | -27.2% |
| Forward P/E | 9.6x | 70.2x | 17.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $13M | $38M | $738K | $290M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $303M | $153M | $359M | $103M |
INMD vs STAA vs LNTH vs NVCR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| InMode Ltd. (INMD) | 100 | 95.0 | -5.0% |
| STAAR Surgical Comp… (STAA) | 100 | 70.3 | -29.7% |
| Lantheus Holdings, … (LNTH) | 100 | 662.8 | +562.8% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 25.0 | -75.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INMD vs STAA vs LNTH vs NVCR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INMD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 23.3% margin vs STAA's -33.6%
STAA is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.54, current ratio 4.55x
- +40.3% vs INMD's -2.1%
LNTH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.47
- 41.9% 10Y total return vs STAA's 273.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 2.70x
- Beta 0.47 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
NVCR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.3%, EPS growth 21.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.8%
- 8.3% revenue growth vs STAA's -23.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.3% revenue growth vs STAA's -23.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.3% margin vs STAA's -33.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.3% vs INMD's -2.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.4% ROA vs STAA's -17.8%, ROIC 30.6% vs -13.2% |
INMD vs STAA vs LNTH vs NVCR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
INMD vs STAA vs LNTH vs NVCR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LNTH leads in 3 of 6 categories
INMD leads 2 • STAA leads 0 • NVCR leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LNTH is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 6.5x STAA's $239M. INMD is the more profitable business, keeping 23.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STAA's -33.6%. On growth, STAA holds the edge at +18.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $375M | $239M | $1.5B | $674M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $81M | -$71M | $347M | -$165M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $87M | -$80M | $279M | -$173M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $91M | -$34M | $372M | -$48M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.8% | +75.6% | +60.5% | +75.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.3% | -33.3% | +18.8% | -27.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.3% | -33.6% | +18.0% | -25.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.2% | -14.4% | +24.0% | -7.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.3% | +18.1% | +1.2% | +12.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -30.8% | +47.8% | +76.5% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
INMD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.7x trailing earnings, INMD trades at a 64% valuation discount to LNTH's 26.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, INMD's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LNTH's 14.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $882M | $1.3B | $5.9B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $593M | $1.2B | $5.6B | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.73x | -16.84x | 26.69x | -13.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.64x | 70.16x | 17.52x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.98x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.88x | — | 14.61x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.38x | 5.63x | 3.84x | 2.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.33x | 3.93x | 5.72x | 5.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.46x | — | 16.73x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LNTH leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LNTH delivers a 24.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. LNTH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LNTH scores 5/9 vs STAA's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.3% | -23.2% | +24.3% | -50.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.8% | -17.8% | +12.4% | -16.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.5% | -13.2% | +30.6% | -16.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.1% | -11.2% | +17.1% | -28.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.11x | 0.00x | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$289M | -$115M | -$358M | $187M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $303M | $153M | $359M | $103M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $38M | $738,000 | $290M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 11.72x | -96.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LNTH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LNTH five years ago would be worth $41,420 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, STAA leads with a +40.3% total return vs INMD's -2.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LNTH at -1.4% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.9% | +15.6% | +35.3% | +28.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.1% | +40.3% | +13.1% | +1.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.2% | -59.7% | -4.0% | -75.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.9% | -80.2% | +314.2% | -91.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.0% | +273.7% | +4192.5% | +30.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.4% | -26.1% | -1.4% | -37.6% |
Risk & Volatility
LNTH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LNTH is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LNTH currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs INMD's 83.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 0.54x | 0.47x | 2.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.74 | $30.81 | $93.00 | $20.06 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.72 | $15.64 | $47.25 | $9.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.2% | +88.5% | +97.8% | +83.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.8 | 70.0 | 61.2 | 69.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 804K | 1.2M | 886K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INMD as "Buy", STAA as "Hold", LNTH as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs -15.9% for STAA (target: $23).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.00 | $22.95 | $101.00 | $33.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 15 | 17 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +14.5% | +0.5% | +5.1% | 0.0% |
LNTH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). INMD leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics).
INMD vs STAA vs LNTH vs NVCR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INMD or STAA or LNTH or NVCR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NovoCure Limited (NVCR) is the stronger pick with 8.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 7% for STAAR Surgical Company (STAA). InMode Ltd. (INMD) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate InMode Ltd. (INMD) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INMD or STAA or LNTH or NVCR?
On trailing P/E, InMode Ltd.
(INMD) is the cheapest at 9. 7x versus Lantheus Holdings, Inc. at 26. 7x. On forward P/E, InMode Ltd. is actually cheaper at 9. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INMD or STAA or LNTH or NVCR?
Over the past 5 years, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) delivered a total return of +314. 2%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LNTH returned +41. 9% versus NVCR's +30. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INMD or STAA or LNTH or NVCR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 370% more volatile than LNTH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INMD or STAA or LNTH or NVCR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NovoCure Limited (NVCR) is pulling ahead at 8.
3% versus -23. 7% for STAAR Surgical Company (STAA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NovoCure Limited grew EPS 21. 8% year-over-year, compared to -295. 1% for STAAR Surgical Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, LNTH leads at 18. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INMD or STAA or LNTH or NVCR?
InMode Ltd.
(INMD) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 3% net margin versus -33. 6% for STAAR Surgical Company — meaning it keeps 25. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INMD leads at 23. 0% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INMD leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INMD or STAA or LNTH or NVCR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, InMode Ltd.
(INMD) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 70. 2x for STAAR Surgical Company — 60. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99. 0% to $33. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — INMD or STAA or LNTH or NVCR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is INMD or STAA or LNTH or NVCR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, STAAR Surgical Company (STAA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
54), +273. 7% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (STAA: +273. 7%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INMD and STAA and LNTH and NVCR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: INMD is a small-cap deep-value stock; STAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LNTH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.