Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
INSG vs CODA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
INSG vs CODA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $306M | $134M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $169M | $28M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $4M |
| Gross Margin | 38.1% | 66.3% |
| Operating Margin | 0.9% | 17.4% |
| Forward P/E | 56.6x | 22.5x |
| Total Debt | $48M | $395K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $29M |
INSG vs CODA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inseego Corp. (INSG) | 100 | 17.8 | -82.2% |
| Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA) | 100 | 212.5 | +112.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INSG vs CODA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INSG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum and efficiency.
- +130.5% vs CODA's +78.9%
- 15.0% ROA vs CODA's 6.6%, ROIC 25.4% vs 11.2%
CODA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.00
- Rev growth 30.7%, EPS growth 15.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
- 8.4% 10Y total return vs INSG's 27.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.7% revenue growth vs INSG's -13.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (22.5x vs 56.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.8% margin vs INSG's 7.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs INSG's 2.39 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +130.5% vs CODA's +78.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.0% ROA vs CODA's 6.6%, ROIC 25.4% vs 11.2% |
INSG vs CODA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
INSG vs CODA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INSG is the larger business by revenue, generating $169M annually — 6.0x CODA's $28M. CODA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INSG's 7.7%. On growth, CODA holds the edge at +28.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $169M | $28M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10M | $6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | $4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | $7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.1% | +66.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +17.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +14.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +24.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.4% | +28.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.1% | +3.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CODA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CODA's 17.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than INSG's 25.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $306M | $134M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $330M | $106M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -104.87x | 32.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 56.63x | 22.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 25.09x | 17.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.84x | 5.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 46.88x | 22.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — INSG and CODA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CODA scores 7/9 vs INSG's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +7.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.0% | +6.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +25.4% | +11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.5% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $24M | -$28M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $29M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $48M | $394,932 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.07x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INSG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CODA five years ago would be worth $14,969 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,269 for INSG. Over the past 12 months, INSG leads with a +130.5% total return vs CODA's +78.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSG at 17.0% vs CODA's 10.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +86.7% | +25.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +130.5% | +78.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.0% | +34.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.3% | +49.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.5% | +844.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.0% | +10.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INSG and CODA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CODA is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INSG's 2.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INSG currently trades 86.6% from its 52-week high vs CODA's 68.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.39x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.80 | $17.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.27 | $5.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.6% | +68.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.0 | 48.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 164K | 256K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates INSG as "Buy" and CODA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 17.6% upside for CODA (target: $14) vs 16.6% for INSG (target: $22).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.00 | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CODA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). INSG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
INSG vs CODA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INSG or CODA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the stronger pick with 30. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 1% for Inseego Corp. (INSG). Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) offers the better valuation at 32. 2x trailing P/E (22. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Inseego Corp. (INSG) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INSG or CODA?
On forward P/E, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 22. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INSG or CODA?
Over the past 5 years, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) delivered a total return of +49. 7%, compared to -77. 3% for Inseego Corp. (INSG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +844. 4% versus INSG's +27. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INSG or CODA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus Inseego Corp. 's 2. 39β — meaning INSG is approximately 138% more volatile than CODA relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — INSG or CODA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is pulling ahead at 30. 7% versus -13. 1% for Inseego Corp. (INSG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coda Octopus Group, Inc. grew EPS 15. 6% year-over-year, compared to -280. 0% for Inseego Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CODA leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INSG or CODA?
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus 0. 5% for Inseego Corp. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus 2. 8% for INSG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODA leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INSG or CODA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) trades at 22. 5x forward P/E versus 56. 6x for Inseego Corp. — 34. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CODA: 17. 6% to $14. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — INSG or CODA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is INSG or CODA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), +844. 4% 10Y return). Inseego Corp. (INSG) carries a higher beta of 2. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CODA: +844. 4%, INSG: +27. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INSG and CODA?
These companies operate in different sectors (INSG (Technology) and CODA (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: INSG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.