Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

INSW vs TK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.24B
5Y Perf.+278.2%
TK
Teekay Corporation

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • BM
Market Cap$1.14B
5Y Perf.+364.8%

INSW vs TK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
INSW logoINSW
TK logoTK
IndustryOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$4.24B$1.14B
Revenue (TTM)$843M$993M
Net Income (TTM)$309M$79M
Gross Margin47.2%28.1%
Operating Margin42.4%24.8%
Forward P/E8.1x61.9x
Total Debt$576M$66M
Cash & Equiv.$117M$685M

INSW vs TKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

INSW
TK
StockMay 20May 26Return
International Seawa… (INSW)100378.2+278.2%
Teekay Corporation (TK)100464.8+364.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: INSW vs TK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: INSW leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Teekay Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
The Growth Play

INSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth -11.4%, EPS growth -25.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.8%
  • 9.7% 10Y total return vs TK's 87.8%
  • -11.4% revenue growth vs TK's -16.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
TK
Teekay Corporation
The Income Pick

TK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 6.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 6.99x
  • Beta 0.38, yield 6.7%, current ratio 6.99x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthINSW logoINSW-11.4% revenue growth vs TK's -16.7%
ValueINSW logoINSWLower P/E (8.1x vs 61.9x)
Quality / MarginsINSW logoINSW36.7% margin vs TK's 7.9%
Stability / SafetyTK logoTKBeta 0.38 vs INSW's 0.43, lower leverage
DividendsTK logoTK6.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs INSW's 3.4%
Momentum (1Y)INSW logoINSW+146.7% vs TK's +87.7%
Efficiency (ROA)INSW logoINSW11.8% ROA vs TK's 3.5%, ROIC 9.4% vs 19.1%

INSW vs TK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

INSWInternational Seaways, Inc.
FY 2025
Pool Revenue Leases
76.1%$642M
Time and Bareboat Charter Leases
18.7%$158M
Voyage Charter Leases
5.2%$44M
TKTeekay Corporation
FY 2024
Voyage charters
87.4%$1.1B
Management fees and other
10.4%$127M
Time charters
2.1%$26M

INSW vs TK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTKLAGGINGINSW

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

TK and INSW operate at a comparable scale, with $993M and $843M in trailing revenue. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 36.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TK's 7.9%. On growth, INSW holds the edge at +37.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricINSW logoINSWInternational Sea…TK logoTKTeekay Corporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$843M$993M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$521M$334M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$309M$79M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$38M$241M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+47.2%+28.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+42.4%+24.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+36.7%+7.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+4.5%+24.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+37.6%-29.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.6%-2.4%
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.6x trailing earnings, TK trades at a 30% valuation discount to INSW's 13.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TK's 1.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than INSW's 10.0x.

MetricINSW logoINSWInternational Sea…TK logoTKTeekay Corporation
Market CapShares × price$4.2B$1.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.7B$525M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS13.77x9.59x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.10x61.91x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.00x1.14x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.03x0.94x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.11x0.66x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF111.18x2.92x
TK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TK leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

INSW delivers a 16.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $4 for TK. TK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INSW's 0.29x.

MetricINSW logoINSWInternational Sea…TK logoTKTeekay Corporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+16.0%+4.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+11.8%+3.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.4%+19.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+12.1%+18.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.29x0.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$459M-$620M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$117M$685M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$576M$66M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.69x69.29x
TK leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — INSW and TK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TK five years ago would be worth $52,251 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $52,215 for INSW. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +146.7% total return vs TK's +87.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TK at 49.8% vs INSW's 38.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricINSW logoINSWInternational Sea…TK logoTKTeekay Corporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+87.1%+54.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+146.7%+87.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+167.9%+235.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+422.1%+422.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+970.0%+87.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+38.9%+49.8%
Evenly matched — INSW and TK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — INSW and TK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TK is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INSW's 0.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricINSW logoINSWInternational Sea…TK logoTKTeekay Corporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.43x0.38x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$88.52$14.22
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$35.60$7.12
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.9%+95.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10075.169.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded585K518K
Evenly matched — INSW and TK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

TK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates INSW as "Buy" and TK as "Buy". For income investors, TK offers the higher dividend yield at 6.69% vs INSW's 3.40%.

MetricINSW logoINSWInternational Sea…TK logoTKTeekay Corporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$83.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts1314
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.4%+6.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises03
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.92$0.91
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+10.2%
TK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). INSW leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallTeekay Corporation (TK)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

INSW vs TK: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is INSW or TK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, International Seaways, Inc.

(INSW) is the stronger pick with -11. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Teekay Corporation (TK). Teekay Corporation (TK) offers the better valuation at 9. 6x trailing P/E (61. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — INSW or TK?

On trailing P/E, Teekay Corporation (TK) is the cheapest at 9.

6x versus International Seaways, Inc. at 13. 8x. On forward P/E, International Seaways, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — INSW or TK?

Over the past 5 years, Teekay Corporation (TK) delivered a total return of +422.

5%, compared to +422. 1% for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +970. 0% versus TK's +87. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — INSW or TK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Teekay Corporation (TK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

38β versus International Seaways, Inc. 's 0. 43β — meaning INSW is approximately 13% more volatile than TK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Corporation (TK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 29% for International Seaways, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — INSW or TK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), International Seaways, Inc.

(INSW) is pulling ahead at -11. 4% versus -16. 7% for Teekay Corporation (TK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teekay Corporation grew EPS -7. 8% year-over-year, compared to -25. 7% for International Seaways, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TK leads at 21. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — INSW or TK?

International Seaways, Inc.

(INSW) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 7% net margin versus 11. 0% for Teekay Corporation — meaning it keeps 36. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSW leads at 36. 3% versus 29. 9% for TK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INSW leads at 42. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is INSW or TK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, International Seaways, Inc.

(INSW) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 61. 9x for Teekay Corporation — 53. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — INSW or TK?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Teekay Corporation (TK) offers the highest yield at 6. 7%, versus 3. 4% for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW).

09

Is INSW or TK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.

(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 3. 4% yield, +970. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +970. 0%, TK: +87. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between INSW and TK?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

INSW

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 18%
  • Net Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TK

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform INSW and TK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(INSW: 37.6% · TK: -29.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(INSW: 36.7% · TK: 7.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(INSW: 13.8x · TK: 9.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.