Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
INSW vs TK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
INSW vs TK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $4.24B | $1.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $843M | $993M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $309M | $79M |
| Gross Margin | 47.2% | 28.1% |
| Operating Margin | 42.4% | 24.8% |
| Forward P/E | 8.1x | 61.9x |
| Total Debt | $576M | $66M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $117M | $685M |
INSW vs TK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| International Seawa… (INSW) | 100 | 378.2 | +278.2% |
| Teekay Corporation (TK) | 100 | 464.8 | +364.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INSW vs TK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -11.4%, EPS growth -25.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.8%
- 9.7% 10Y total return vs TK's 87.8%
- -11.4% revenue growth vs TK's -16.7%
TK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 6.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 6.99x
- Beta 0.38, yield 6.7%, current ratio 6.99x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -11.4% revenue growth vs TK's -16.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 61.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.7% margin vs TK's 7.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs INSW's 0.43, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs INSW's 3.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +146.7% vs TK's +87.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs TK's 3.5%, ROIC 9.4% vs 19.1% |
INSW vs TK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
INSW vs TK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TK and INSW operate at a comparable scale, with $993M and $843M in trailing revenue. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 36.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TK's 7.9%. On growth, INSW holds the edge at +37.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $843M | $993M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $521M | $334M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $309M | $79M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $38M | $241M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.2% | +28.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +42.4% | +24.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +36.7% | +7.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +24.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.6% | -29.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.6% | -2.4% |
Valuation Metrics
TK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.6x trailing earnings, TK trades at a 30% valuation discount to INSW's 13.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TK's 1.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than INSW's 10.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.2B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.7B | $525M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.77x | 9.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.10x | 61.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.00x | 1.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.03x | 0.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.11x | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 111.18x | 2.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TK leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INSW delivers a 16.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $4 for TK. TK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INSW's 0.29x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.0% | +4.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.8% | +3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.4% | +19.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.1% | +18.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $459M | -$620M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $117M | $685M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $576M | $66M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.69x | 69.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — INSW and TK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TK five years ago would be worth $52,251 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $52,215 for INSW. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +146.7% total return vs TK's +87.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TK at 49.8% vs INSW's 38.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +87.1% | +54.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +146.7% | +87.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +167.9% | +235.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +422.1% | +422.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +970.0% | +87.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.9% | +49.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INSW and TK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TK is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INSW's 0.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.43x | 0.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $88.52 | $14.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.60 | $7.12 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.9% | +95.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 75.1 | 69.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 585K | 518K |
Analyst Outlook
TK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates INSW as "Buy" and TK as "Buy". For income investors, TK offers the higher dividend yield at 6.69% vs INSW's 3.40%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $83.33 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.4% | +6.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.92 | $0.91 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +10.2% |
TK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). INSW leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
INSW vs TK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INSW or TK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger pick with -11. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Teekay Corporation (TK). Teekay Corporation (TK) offers the better valuation at 9. 6x trailing P/E (61. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INSW or TK?
On trailing P/E, Teekay Corporation (TK) is the cheapest at 9.
6x versus International Seaways, Inc. at 13. 8x. On forward P/E, International Seaways, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INSW or TK?
Over the past 5 years, Teekay Corporation (TK) delivered a total return of +422.
5%, compared to +422. 1% for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +970. 0% versus TK's +87. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INSW or TK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Teekay Corporation (TK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
38β versus International Seaways, Inc. 's 0. 43β — meaning INSW is approximately 13% more volatile than TK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Corporation (TK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 29% for International Seaways, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INSW or TK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is pulling ahead at -11. 4% versus -16. 7% for Teekay Corporation (TK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teekay Corporation grew EPS -7. 8% year-over-year, compared to -25. 7% for International Seaways, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TK leads at 21. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INSW or TK?
International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 7% net margin versus 11. 0% for Teekay Corporation — meaning it keeps 36. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSW leads at 36. 3% versus 29. 9% for TK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INSW leads at 42. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INSW or TK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 61. 9x for Teekay Corporation — 53. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — INSW or TK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Teekay Corporation (TK) offers the highest yield at 6. 7%, versus 3. 4% for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW).
09Is INSW or TK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 3. 4% yield, +970. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +970. 0%, TK: +87. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INSW and TK?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.