Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
INTT vs COHU vs FORM vs AEHR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
INTT vs COHU vs FORM vs AEHR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $208M | $2.23B | $11.28B | $2.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $121M | $481M | $840M | $49M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $591K | $-56M | $68M | $-11M |
| Gross Margin | 44.0% | 25.7% | 42.1% | 30.2% |
| Operating Margin | 0.7% | -10.6% | 12.7% | -27.8% |
| Forward P/E | 39.9x | 89.2x | 66.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $16M | $359M | $45M | $11M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $227M | $103M | $25M |
INTT vs COHU vs FORM vs AEHR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| inTEST Corporation (INTT) | 100 | 522.3 | +422.3% |
| Cohu, Inc. (COHU) | 100 | 315.3 | +215.3% |
| FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) | 100 | 574.8 | +474.8% |
| Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) | 100 | 5530.9 | +5430.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INTT vs COHU vs FORM vs AEHR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INTT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.19
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 1.19 vs AEHR's 4.77
COHU is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 12.7%, EPS growth -6.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -17.7%
- Beta 2.13, current ratio 6.88x
- 12.7% revenue growth vs AEHR's -20.2%
FORM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.02, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 4.50x
- 8.1% margin vs AEHR's -22.7%
- 5.6% ROA vs AEHR's -7.5%, ROIC 5.4% vs -3.0%
AEHR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 70.3% 10Y total return vs FORM's 19.5%
- +9.9% vs INTT's +159.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.7% revenue growth vs AEHR's -20.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.1% margin vs AEHR's -22.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.19 vs AEHR's 4.77 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +9.9% vs INTT's +159.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.6% ROA vs AEHR's -7.5%, ROIC 5.4% vs -3.0% |
INTT vs COHU vs FORM vs AEHR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
INTT vs COHU vs FORM vs AEHR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FORM leads in 2 of 6 categories
INTT leads 1 • AEHR leads 1 • COHU leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FORM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FORM is the larger business by revenue, generating $840M annually — 17.1x AEHR's $49M. FORM is the more profitable business, keeping 8.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AEHR's -22.7%. On growth, FORM holds the edge at +32.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $121M | $481M | $840M | $49M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6M | -$11M | $152M | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $591,000 | -$56M | $68M | -$11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $32M | -$5M | -$14M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.0% | +25.7% | +42.1% | +30.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | -10.6% | +12.7% | -27.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | -11.5% | +8.1% | -22.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +6.6% | -0.6% | -28.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.2% | +29.3% | +32.0% | -26.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +133.4% | +60.6% | +2.2% | -2.2% |
Valuation Metrics
INTT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, INTT's 68.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FORM's 100.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $208M | $2.2B | $11.3B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $209M | $2.4B | $11.2B | $2.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -79.10x | -29.86x | 209.68x | -702.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 39.86x | 89.21x | 66.48x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 68.02x | — | 100.94x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.82x | 4.93x | 14.37x | 47.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.96x | 2.82x | 10.94x | 21.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 36.52x | 207.83x | 960.69x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FORM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FORM delivers a 6.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-8 for AEHR. FORM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COHU's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INTT scores 5/9 vs AEHR's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.6% | -6.8% | +6.7% | -8.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | -4.9% | +5.6% | -7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.6% | -5.7% | +5.4% | -3.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.2% | -5.9% | +6.1% | -3.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.46x | 0.04x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | $132M | -$58M | -$14M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $227M | $103M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16M | $359M | $45M | $11M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.17x | -168.82x | 252.69x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AEHR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AEHR five years ago would be worth $398,515 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,218 for COHU. Over the past 12 months, AEHR leads with a +991.6% total return vs INTT's +159.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FORM at 72.9% vs INTT's -8.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +120.3% | +92.9% | +144.4% | +311.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +159.9% | +199.7% | +387.8% | +991.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.1% | +40.7% | +417.3% | +242.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.8% | +22.2% | +273.9% | +3885.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +327.0% | +330.2% | +1952.2% | +7029.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.0% | +12.1% | +72.9% | +50.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INTT and COHU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INTT is the less volatile stock with a 1.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEHR's 4.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COHU currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs INTT's 84.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.19x | 2.13x | 2.02x | 4.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.75 | $50.68 | $159.09 | $102.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.58 | $15.34 | $26.08 | $8.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.1% | +93.7% | +90.9% | +89.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.5 | 75.5 | 66.5 | 67.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 251K | 953K | 1.6M | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INTT as "Buy", COHU as "Buy", FORM as "Hold", AEHR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 4.8% upside for COHU (target: $50) vs -32.1% for AEHR (target: $62).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.33 | $49.75 | $123.38 | $62.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 14 | 19 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.3% | +0.2% | +0.0% |
FORM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). INTT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
INTT vs COHU vs FORM vs AEHR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INTT or COHU or FORM or AEHR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cohu, Inc.
(COHU) is the stronger pick with 12. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 9% for inTEST Corporation (INTT). FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) offers the better valuation at 209. 7x trailing P/E (66. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate inTEST Corporation (INTT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INTT or COHU or FORM or AEHR?
On forward P/E, inTEST Corporation is actually cheaper at 39.
9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INTT or COHU or FORM or AEHR?
Over the past 5 years, Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) delivered a total return of +38.
9%, compared to +22. 2% for Cohu, Inc. (COHU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEHR returned +70. 3% versus INTT's +327. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INTT or COHU or FORM or AEHR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), inTEST Corporation (INTT) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
19β versus Aehr Test Systems's 4. 77β — meaning AEHR is approximately 300% more volatile than INTT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 46% for Cohu, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INTT or COHU or FORM or AEHR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cohu, Inc.
(COHU) is pulling ahead at 12. 7% versus -12. 9% for inTEST Corporation (INTT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aehr Test Systems grew EPS 0. 0% year-over-year, compared to -187. 5% for inTEST Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AEHR leads at 5. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INTT or COHU or FORM or AEHR?
FormFactor, Inc.
(FORM) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 9% net margin versus -16. 4% for Cohu, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FORM leads at 8. 2% versus -13. 3% for COHU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INTT leads at 43. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INTT or COHU or FORM or AEHR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, inTEST Corporation (INTT) trades at 39.
9x forward P/E versus 89. 2x for Cohu, Inc. — 49. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COHU: 4. 8% to $49. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — INTT or COHU or FORM or AEHR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is INTT or COHU or FORM or AEHR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FormFactor, Inc.
(FORM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1952% 10Y return). Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) carries a higher beta of 4. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FORM: +1952%, AEHR: +70. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INTT and COHU and FORM and AEHR?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.