IONR
ioneer Ltd
Industrial Materials
Market Cap$10M
5Y Perf.-76.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
IONR vs SLI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SLI
Standard Lithium Ltd.
Industrial Materials
Market Cap$803M
5Y Perf.-7.3%
IONR vs SLI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | IONR | SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Industrial Materials |
| Market Cap | $10M | $803M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $-48M |
| Total Debt | $373K | $477K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $32M |
IONR vs SLI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
IONR
SLI
| Stock | Jun 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ioneer Ltd (IONR) | 100 | 23.4 | -76.6% |
| Standard Lithium Lt… (SLI) | 100 | 92.7 | -7.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IONR vs SLI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: IONR leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Standard Lithium Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
IONR
ioneer Ltd
The Income Pick
IONR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.33
- EPS growth 97.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.33, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 8.49x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SLI
Standard Lithium Ltd.
The Long-Run Compounder
SLI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 222.1% 10Y total return vs IONR's -76.6%
- -8.7% revenue growth vs IONR's -10.3%
- +172.9% vs IONR's +15.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SLI | -8.7% revenue growth vs IONR's -10.3% |
| Quality / Margins | IONR | 0.3% margin vs SLI's 0.2% |
| Stability / Safety | IONR | Beta 1.33 vs SLI's 1.62, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SLI | +172.9% vs IONR's +15.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | IONR | -5.2% ROA vs SLI's -15.9%, ROIC -0.0% vs -11.2% |
IONR vs SLI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2016
IONR vs SLI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLIONRLAGGINGSLI
SLIStandard Lithium Ltd.
1leads
IONRioneer Ltd
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SLIMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
—
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
IONR2/2
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
IONR8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SLI6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IONR and SLI operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | IONRioneer Ltd | SLIStandard Lithium … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $28M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | -$48M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | -$18M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.0% | — |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Valuation Metrics
IONR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | IONRioneer Ltd | SLIStandard Lithium … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10M | $803M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$15M | $771M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1032.50x | -13.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.04x | 3.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
IONR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IONR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IONR delivers a -5.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-5 in annual profit, vs $-18 for SLI. IONR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLI's 0.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IONR scores 4/9 vs SLI's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | IONRioneer Ltd | SLIStandard Lithium … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.3% | -17.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.2% | -15.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.0% | -11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.0% | -10.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$25M | -$31M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $32M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $373,000 | $476,715 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -192.86x | -1559.24x |
IONR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SLI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SLI five years ago would be worth $12,130 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,343 for IONR. Over the past 12 months, SLI leads with a +172.9% total return vs IONR's +15.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SLI at 5.6% vs IONR's -26.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | IONRioneer Ltd | SLIStandard Lithium … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.9% | -17.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.4% | +172.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.8% | +17.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.6% | +21.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.6% | +222.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.2% | +5.6% |
SLI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IONR and SLI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IONR is the less volatile stock with a 1.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLI's 1.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLI currently trades 61.4% from its 52-week high vs IONR's 50.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | IONRioneer Ltd | SLIStandard Lithium … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 1.62x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.20 | $6.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.30 | $1.41 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.4% | +61.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.7 | 53.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 170K | 1.8M |
Evenly matched — IONR and SLI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | IONRioneer Ltd | SLIStandard Lithium … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $4.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
IONR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SLI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best Overallioneer Ltd (IONR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
IONR vs SLI: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IONR or SLI a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Standard Lithium Ltd.
(SLI) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IONR or SLI?
Over the past 5 years, Standard Lithium Ltd.
(SLI) delivered a total return of +21. 3%, compared to -76. 6% for ioneer Ltd (IONR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SLI returned +222. 1% versus IONR's -76. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IONR or SLI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ioneer Ltd (IONR) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
33β versus Standard Lithium Ltd. 's 1. 62β — meaning SLI is approximately 22% more volatile than IONR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ioneer Ltd (IONR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 0% for Standard Lithium Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — IONR or SLI?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ioneer Ltd grew EPS 97.
3% year-over-year, compared to -20. 0% for Standard Lithium Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IONR or SLI?
ioneer Ltd (IONR) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Standard Lithium Ltd. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IONR leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for SLI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IONR leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — IONR or SLI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is IONR or SLI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ioneer Ltd (IONR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Standard Lithium Ltd. (SLI) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IONR: -76. 6%, SLI: +222. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between IONR and SLI?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.