Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
IONR vs SQM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
IONR vs SQM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $10M | $13.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $4.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $524M |
| Gross Margin | — | 27.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 21.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.6x |
| Total Debt | $373K | $4.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $1.38B |
IONR vs SQM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ioneer Ltd (IONR) | 100 | 23.4 | -76.6% |
| Sociedad Química y … (SQM) | 100 | 109.4 | +9.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IONR vs SQM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IONR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- EPS growth 97.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.33, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 8.49x
- -10.3% revenue growth vs SQM's -39.4%
SQM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.26, yield 0.3%
- 468.7% 10Y total return vs IONR's -76.6%
- Beta 1.26, yield 0.3%, current ratio 2.51x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -10.3% revenue growth vs SQM's -39.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.1% margin vs IONR's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.26 vs IONR's 1.33 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +170.0% vs IONR's +15.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs IONR's -5.2%, ROIC 9.0% vs -0.0% |
IONR vs SQM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IONR vs SQM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SQM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SQM and IONR operate at a comparable scale, with $4.3B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $917M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | $524M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | $66M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +27.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +21.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +12.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +1.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +8.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.0% | +34.8% |
Valuation Metrics
IONR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10M | $13.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$15M | $16.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1032.50x | -64.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.04x | 5.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 43.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SQM leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SQM delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-5 for IONR. IONR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SQM's 0.93x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.3% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.2% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.0% | +9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.0% | +11.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.93x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$25M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $373,000 | $4.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -192.86x | 5.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SQM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SQM five years ago would be worth $19,446 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,343 for IONR. Over the past 12 months, SQM leads with a +170.0% total return vs IONR's +15.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SQM at 12.4% vs IONR's -26.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.9% | +32.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.4% | +170.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.8% | +41.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.6% | +94.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.6% | +468.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.2% | +12.4% |
Risk & Volatility
SQM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SQM is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IONR's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SQM currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs IONR's 50.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.20 | $98.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.30 | $29.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.4% | +93.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.7 | 57.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 170K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
SQM is the only dividend payer here at 0.26% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $78.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SQM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IONR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
IONR vs SQM: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IONR or SQM a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.
A. (SQM) a "Hold" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IONR or SQM?
Over the past 5 years, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.
A. (SQM) delivered a total return of +94. 5%, compared to -76. 6% for ioneer Ltd (IONR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SQM returned +468. 7% versus IONR's -76. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IONR or SQM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.
A. (SQM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 26β versus ioneer Ltd's 1. 33β — meaning IONR is approximately 5% more volatile than SQM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ioneer Ltd (IONR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 93% for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — IONR or SQM?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ioneer Ltd grew EPS 97.
3% year-over-year, compared to -120. 1% for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IONR or SQM?
ioneer Ltd (IONR) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -8. 9% for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S. A. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SQM leads at 23. 5% versus 0. 0% for IONR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SQM leads at 29. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — IONR or SQM?
In this comparison, SQM (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. IONR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is IONR or SQM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.
A. (SQM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +468. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SQM: +468. 7%, IONR: -76. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between IONR and SQM?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.