Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
IPSC vs CELC vs KYMR vs ILMN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
IPSC vs CELC vs KYMR vs ILMN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $202M | $5.66B | $6.91B | $21.07B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $109M | $0.00 | $51M | $4.39B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $-163M | $-315M | $853M |
| Gross Margin | 94.2% | — | 33.2% | 67.1% |
| Operating Margin | -15.8% | — | -7.0% | 20.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 26.8x |
| Total Debt | $40M | $98M | $82M | $2.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $62M | $23M | $357M | $1.42B |
IPSC vs CELC vs KYMR vs ILMN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Century Therapeutic… (IPSC) | 100 | 7.9 | -92.1% |
| Celcuity Inc. (CELC) | 100 | 544.6 | +444.6% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 174.5 | +74.5% |
| Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) | 100 | 30.2 | -69.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IPSC vs CELC vs KYMR vs ILMN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IPSC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.6%, EPS growth 91.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 175.9%
- 15.6% revenue growth vs CELC's -73.2%
CELC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 8.1% 10Y total return vs KYMR's 154.4%
- +11.8% vs ILMN's +81.7%
KYMR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.15
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 10.47x
- Beta 1.15, current ratio 10.47x
- Beta 1.15 vs IPSC's 2.13, lower leverage
ILMN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and efficiency.
- 19.4% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
- 13.4% ROA vs CELC's -58.0%, ROIC 16.8% vs -50.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.6% revenue growth vs CELC's -73.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.4% margin vs KYMR's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.15 vs IPSC's 2.13, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +11.8% vs ILMN's +81.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.4% ROA vs CELC's -58.0%, ROIC 16.8% vs -50.3% |
IPSC vs CELC vs KYMR vs ILMN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
IPSC vs CELC vs KYMR vs ILMN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ILMN leads in 2 of 6 categories
IPSC leads 1 • CELC leads 1 • KYMR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ILMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ILMN and CELC operate at a comparable scale, with $4.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. ILMN is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KYMR's -6.1%. On growth, KYMR holds the edge at +55.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $109M | $0 | $51M | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$333,000 | -$159M | -$352M | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | -$163M | -$315M | $853M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$105M | -$145M | -$244M | $989M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +94.2% | — | +33.2% | +67.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.8% | — | -7.0% | +20.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.8% | — | -6.1% | +19.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -95.9% | — | -4.7% | +22.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | — | +55.5% | +4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +45.7% | -31.4% | +13.4% | +6.1% |
Valuation Metrics
IPSC leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $202M | $5.7B | $6.9B | $21.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $181M | $5.7B | $6.6B | $22.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -16.50x | -46.19x | -22.93x | 25.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 26.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 6.01x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 19.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.85x | — | 176.26x | 4.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.26x | 44.60x | 4.52x | 7.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 22.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ILMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ILMN delivers a 32.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-179 for CELC. KYMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ILMN's 0.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ILMN scores 8/9 vs CELC's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.9% | -179.0% | -25.0% | +32.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.6% | -58.0% | -22.3% | +13.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.8% | -50.3% | -24.9% | +16.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.1% | -58.0% | -27.2% | +17.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.85x | 0.05x | 0.94x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$22M | $75M | -$275M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $62M | $23M | $357M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $40M | $98M | $82M | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -5.02x | -2119.53x | 12.09x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CELC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CELC five years ago would be worth $48,161 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,012 for IPSC. Over the past 12 months, CELC leads with a +1184.0% total return vs ILMN's +81.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CELC at 140.6% vs IPSC's -10.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +132.2% | +30.0% | +16.3% | +3.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +342.7% | +1184.0% | +190.7% | +81.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.5% | +1292.0% | +205.1% | -27.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.9% | +381.6% | +92.1% | -62.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.9% | +814.7% | +154.4% | +0.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.6% | +140.6% | +45.0% | -10.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KYMR and ILMN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KYMR is the less volatile stock with a 1.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IPSC's 2.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ILMN currently trades 89.2% from its 52-week high vs IPSC's 76.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.13x | 1.71x | 1.15x | 1.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.03 | $151.02 | $103.00 | $155.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.43 | $9.51 | $28.06 | $73.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.2% | +86.6% | +82.2% | +89.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.4 | 63.4 | 54.1 | 65.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 800K | 602K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IPSC as "Buy", CELC as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", ILMN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.3% upside for KYMR (target: $117) vs -4.6% for CELC (target: $125).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.00 | $124.75 | $117.06 | $147.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 9 | 26 | 50 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.5% |
ILMN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IPSC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
IPSC vs CELC vs KYMR vs ILMN: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IPSC or CELC or KYMR or ILMN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Century Therapeutics, Inc.
(IPSC) is the stronger pick with 1557% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) offers the better valuation at 25. 5x trailing P/E (26. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Century Therapeutics, Inc. (IPSC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IPSC or CELC or KYMR or ILMN?
Over the past 5 years, Celcuity Inc.
(CELC) delivered a total return of +381. 6%, compared to -89. 9% for Century Therapeutics, Inc. (IPSC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CELC returned +814. 7% versus IPSC's -89. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IPSC or CELC or KYMR or ILMN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 15β versus Century Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 13β — meaning IPSC is approximately 85% more volatile than KYMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 94% for Illumina, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — IPSC or CELC or KYMR or ILMN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Century Therapeutics, Inc.
(IPSC) is pulling ahead at 1557% versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Illumina, Inc. grew EPS 170. 9% year-over-year, compared to -23. 8% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IPSC leads at 175. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IPSC or CELC or KYMR or ILMN?
Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 6% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ILMN leads at 19. 9% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is IPSC or CELC or KYMR or ILMN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KYMR: 38.
3% to $117. 06.
07Which pays a better dividend — IPSC or CELC or KYMR or ILMN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is IPSC or CELC or KYMR or ILMN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 15), +154. 4% 10Y return). Century Therapeutics, Inc. (IPSC) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KYMR: +154. 4%, IPSC: -89. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between IPSC and CELC and KYMR and ILMN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IPSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CELC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ILMN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.