Beverages - Alcoholic
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
IPST vs SWKH vs MGPI vs HRZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries
Asset Management
IPST vs SWKH vs MGPI vs HRZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Alcoholic | Asset Management | Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $57M | $192M | $408M | $199M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $41M | $521M | $40M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-138M | $23M | $-240M | $28M |
| Gross Margin | 50.8% | — | 36.4% | 18.0% |
| Operating Margin | -122.1% | 48.9% | -51.2% | -4.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.6x | 12.3x | 6.1x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $32M | $267M | $473M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $245K | $43M | $18M | $106M |
IPST vs SWKH vs MGPI vs HRZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| IP Strategy Holding… (IPST) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
| SWK Holdings Corpor… (SWKH) | 100 | 134.9 | +34.9% |
| MGP Ingredients, In… (MGPI) | 100 | 42.6 | -57.4% |
| Horizon Technology … (HRZN) | 100 | 48.6 | -51.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IPST vs SWKH vs MGPI vs HRZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IPST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 20.4%, EPS growth 69.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.8%
- 20.4% revenue growth vs MGPI's -23.8%
SWKH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 164.3% 10Y total return vs HRZN's 52.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, Low D/E 13.7%, current ratio 9.41x
- Beta 0.01, current ratio 9.41x
- -6.1% margin vs IPST's -13.6%
MGPI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 2.5%
HRZN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (6.1x vs 12.3x)
- 27.8% yield, vs MGPI's 2.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.4% revenue growth vs MGPI's -23.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 12.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -6.1% margin vs IPST's -13.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs IPST's 2.40 | |
| Dividends | 27.8% yield, vs MGPI's 2.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.4% vs IPST's -97.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.3% ROA vs IPST's -85.4%, ROIC 5.1% vs -15.4% |
IPST vs SWKH vs MGPI vs HRZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
IPST vs SWKH vs MGPI vs HRZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SWKH leads in 4 of 6 categories
HRZN leads 1 • IPST leads 0 • MGPI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SWKH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGPI is the larger business by revenue, generating $521M annually — 51.5x IPST's $10M. SWKH is the more profitable business, keeping -6.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IPST's -13.6%. On growth, IPST holds the edge at +52.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $41M | $521M | $40M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $25M | -$249M | $19M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$138M | $23M | -$240M | $28M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | $23M | $54M | $67M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.8% | — | +36.4% | +18.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -122.1% | +48.9% | -51.2% | -4.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.6% | -6.1% | -46.0% | -6.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -152.4% | +65.8% | +10.4% | +141.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.5% | — | -12.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +54.6% | +157.1% | -44.0% | -29.6% |
Valuation Metrics
HRZN leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $57M | $192M | $408M | $199M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $61M | $182M | $656M | $567M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.37x | -75.71x | -3.83x | 4.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.58x | 12.31x | 6.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.18x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.94x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.61x | 4.64x | 0.76x | 4.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.52x | 0.82x | 0.57x | 0.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.05x | 5.37x | 3.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SWKH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HRZN delivers a 9.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-107 for IPST. IPST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HRZN's 1.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SWKH scores 5/9 vs MGPI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -106.9% | +8.4% | -32.1% | +9.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -85.4% | +7.3% | -19.1% | +3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -15.4% | +5.1% | -6.7% | -0.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -21.7% | +6.8% | -8.1% | -0.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.14x | 0.37x | 1.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | -$11M | $248M | $368M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $245,282 | $43M | $18M | $106M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $32M | $267M | $473M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 143.02x | 7.40x | -40.23x | 0.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SWKH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SWKH five years ago would be worth $15,781 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $43 for IPST. Over the past 12 months, SWKH leads with a +15.4% total return vs IPST's -97.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SWKH at 13.8% vs IPST's -83.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -82.7% | -7.2% | -20.3% | -26.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.0% | +15.4% | -38.0% | -23.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +47.5% | -79.8% | -27.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +57.8% | -66.0% | -32.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +164.3% | -17.3% | +52.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -83.7% | +13.8% | -41.3% | -10.3% |
Risk & Volatility
SWKH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SWKH is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IPST's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SWKH currently trades 88.8% from its 52-week high vs IPST's 1.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.22x | 0.04x | 0.61x | 0.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $532.00 | $17.90 | $34.99 | $8.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.41 | $13.32 | $16.45 | $3.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.1% | +88.8% | +54.6% | +53.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.1 | 33.4 | 47.6 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 224K | 17K | 279K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MGPI and HRZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SWKH as "Buy", MGPI as "Buy", HRZN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 51.9% upside for MGPI (target: $29) vs 44.1% for HRZN (target: $7). For income investors, HRZN offers the higher dividend yield at 27.80% vs MGPI's 2.53%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $29.00 | $6.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 14 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.5% | +27.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.48 | $1.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% |
SWKH leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HRZN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
IPST vs SWKH vs MGPI vs HRZN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IPST or SWKH or MGPI or HRZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, IP Strategy Holdings, Inc.
(IPST) is the stronger pick with 20. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 8% for MGP Ingredients, Inc. (MGPI). Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) offers the better valuation at 4. 3x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SWK Holdings Corporation (SWKH) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IPST or SWKH or MGPI or HRZN?
On forward P/E, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation is actually cheaper at 6.
1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IPST or SWKH or MGPI or HRZN?
Over the past 5 years, SWK Holdings Corporation (SWKH) delivered a total return of +57.
8%, compared to -99. 6% for IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. (IPST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SWKH returned +164. 3% versus IPST's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IPST or SWKH or MGPI or HRZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SWK Holdings Corporation (SWKH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
04β versus IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 22β — meaning IPST is approximately 5461% more volatile than SWKH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. (IPST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 149% for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IPST or SWKH or MGPI or HRZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), IP Strategy Holdings, Inc.
(IPST) is pulling ahead at 20. 4% versus -23. 8% for MGP Ingredients, Inc. (MGPI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Horizon Technology Finance Corporation grew EPS 756. 3% year-over-year, compared to -419. 9% for MGP Ingredients, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IPST leads at 6. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IPST or SWKH or MGPI or HRZN?
SWK Holdings Corporation (SWKH) is the more profitable company, earning -6.
1% net margin versus -1360. 9% for IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps -6. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SWKH leads at 48. 9% versus -122. 1% for IPST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IPST leads at 46. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IPST or SWKH or MGPI or HRZN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) trades at 6.
1x forward P/E versus 12. 3x for MGP Ingredients, Inc. — 6. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MGPI: 51. 9% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — IPST or SWKH or MGPI or HRZN?
In this comparison, HRZN (27.
8% yield), MGPI (2. 5% yield) pay a dividend. IPST, SWKH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IPST or SWKH or MGPI or HRZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SWK Holdings Corporation (SWKH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
04), +164. 3% 10Y return). IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. (IPST) carries a higher beta of 2. 22 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SWKH: +164. 3%, IPST: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IPST and SWKH and MGPI and HRZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (IPST (Consumer Defensive) and SWKH (Financial Services) and MGPI (Consumer Defensive) and HRZN (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IPST is a small-cap high-growth stock; SWKH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGPI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HRZN is a small-cap high-growth stock. MGPI, HRZN pay a dividend while IPST, SWKH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Financial Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 8%
- Dividend Yield > 11.1%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.