Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IPWR vs VICR vs MPWR vs POWI vs ON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
IPWR vs VICR vs MPWR vs POWI vs ON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $38M | $11.79B | $77.41B | $4.00B | $39.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $38K | $453M | $2.79B | $446M | $6.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $119M | $616M | $17M | $574M |
| Gross Margin | -60.1% | 57.3% | 55.2% | 53.9% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | -289.8% | 18.1% | 26.1% | 4.6% | 10.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 94.3x | 73.1x | 55.5x | 34.4x |
| Total Debt | $403K | $13M | $24M | $0.00 | $3.47B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $403M | $1.10B | $59M | $2.15B |
IPWR vs VICR vs MPWR vs POWI vs ON — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ideal Power Inc. (IPWR) | 100 | 212.4 | +112.4% |
| Vicor Corporation (VICR) | 100 | 428.6 | +328.6% |
| Monolithic Power Sy… (MPWR) | 100 | 751.4 | +651.4% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 132.6 | +32.6% |
| ON Semiconductor Co… (ON) | 100 | 610.0 | +510.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IPWR vs VICR vs MPWR vs POWI vs ON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, IPWR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
VICR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.5%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.7%
- 27.0% 10Y total return vs MPWR's 24.9%
- PEG 2.10 vs MPWR's 2.48
- 26.2% margin vs IPWR's -280.4%
MPWR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.28, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 5.91x
- 26.4% revenue growth vs IPWR's -56.1%
POWI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 2.08, yield 1.2%
- Beta 2.08, yield 1.2%, current ratio 6.51x
- 1.2% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs MPWR's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
ON is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and stability is your priority.
- Lower P/E (34.4x vs 55.5x)
- Beta 1.95 vs VICR's 2.79
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.4% revenue growth vs IPWR's -56.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (34.4x vs 55.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.2% margin vs IPWR's -280.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.95 vs VICR's 2.79 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs MPWR's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.4% vs IPWR's -7.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.6% ROA vs IPWR's -77.2%, ROIC 8.9% vs -352.7% |
IPWR vs VICR vs MPWR vs POWI vs ON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IPWR vs VICR vs MPWR vs POWI vs ON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VICR leads in 2 of 6 categories
ON leads 2 • MPWR leads 1 • POWI leads 1 • IPWR leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VICR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ON is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 160702.9x IPWR's $37,728. VICR is the more profitable business, keeping 26.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IPWR's -280.4%. On growth, MPWR holds the edge at +20.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $37,728 | $453M | $2.8B | $446M | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $103M | $781M | $41M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | $119M | $616M | $17M | $574M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | $119M | $664M | $85M | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -60.1% | +57.3% | +55.2% | +53.9% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -289.8% | +18.1% | +26.1% | +4.6% | +10.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -280.4% | +26.2% | +22.1% | +3.7% | +9.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -248.5% | +26.3% | +23.8% | +18.9% | +24.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +11.5% | +20.8% | +2.6% | +4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.6% | +3.4% | -88.4% | -60.0% | +93.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ON leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 100.1x trailing earnings, VICR trades at a 71% valuation discount to ON's 346.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), VICR offers better value at 2.23x vs MPWR's 4.19x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $38M | $11.8B | $77.4B | $4.0B | $39.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33M | $11.4B | $76.3B | $3.9B | $40.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.97x | 100.13x | 123.60x | 184.18x | 346.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 94.31x | 73.12x | 55.51x | 34.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.23x | 4.19x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 197.81x | 97.90x | 79.69x | 28.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1018.52x | 28.91x | 27.74x | 9.02x | 6.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.35x | 16.50x | 21.56x | 6.01x | 5.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 98.86x | 116.20x | 45.93x | 27.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MPWR leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VICR delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-92 for IPWR. MPWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ON's 0.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VICR scores 7/9 vs IPWR's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -91.6% | +18.7% | +17.9% | +2.4% | +7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -77.2% | +16.6% | +15.2% | +2.1% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.5% | +8.9% | +22.2% | +2.4% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -77.2% | +5.7% | +20.4% | +2.9% | +6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.02x | 0.01x | — | 0.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | -$390M | -$1.1B | -$59M | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $403M | $1.1B | $59M | $2.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $403,335 | $13M | $24M | $0 | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | — | 10.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VICR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MPWR five years ago would be worth $46,617 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,698 for IPWR. Over the past 12 months, VICR leads with a +535.7% total return vs IPWR's -7.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VICR at 82.5% vs IPWR's -20.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +39.7% | +123.6% | +68.5% | +93.2% | +77.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.8% | +535.7% | +148.6% | +44.4% | +159.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.3% | +507.9% | +280.3% | -6.3% | +24.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.0% | +201.3% | +366.2% | -8.3% | +160.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.3% | +2704.1% | +2494.7% | +232.7% | +1004.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.3% | +82.5% | +56.1% | -2.2% | +7.7% |
Risk & Volatility
ON leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ON is the less volatile stock with a 1.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VICR's 2.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ON currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs IPWR's 66.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.41x | 2.79x | 2.28x | 2.08x | 1.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.90 | $293.95 | $1662.00 | $78.94 | $105.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.62 | $40.27 | $613.00 | $30.86 | $37.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.8% | +88.9% | +94.8% | +91.0% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.1 | 68.2 | 71.0 | 76.1 | 81.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 185K | 864K | 577K | 967K | 9.2M |
Analyst Outlook
POWI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VICR as "Buy", MPWR as "Buy", POWI as "Buy", ON as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.0% upside for POWI (target: $79) vs -38.0% for ON (target: $62). For income investors, POWI offers the higher dividend yield at 1.17% vs MPWR's 0.37%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $245.00 | $1615.00 | $79.00 | $62.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 25 | 16 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.4% | +1.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 8 | 18 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $5.90 | $0.84 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +0.0% | +2.5% | +3.5% |
VICR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ON leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
IPWR vs VICR vs MPWR vs POWI vs ON: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IPWR or VICR or MPWR or POWI or ON a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is the stronger pick with 26. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 1% for Ideal Power Inc. (IPWR). Vicor Corporation (VICR) offers the better valuation at 100. 1x trailing P/E (94. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vicor Corporation (VICR) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IPWR or VICR or MPWR or POWI or ON?
On trailing P/E, Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the cheapest at 100.
1x versus ON Semiconductor Corporation at 346. 8x. On forward P/E, ON Semiconductor Corporation is actually cheaper at 34. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Vicor Corporation wins at 2. 10x versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 's 2. 48x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IPWR or VICR or MPWR or POWI or ON?
Over the past 5 years, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) delivered a total return of +366. 2%, compared to -43. 0% for Ideal Power Inc. (IPWR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VICR returned +27. 0% versus IPWR's -90. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IPWR or VICR or MPWR or POWI or ON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
95β versus Vicor Corporation's 2. 79β — meaning VICR is approximately 43% more volatile than ON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 45% for ON Semiconductor Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IPWR or VICR or MPWR or POWI or ON?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is pulling ahead at 26. 4% versus -56. 1% for Ideal Power Inc. (IPWR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vicor Corporation grew EPS 1764% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for ON Semiconductor Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MPWR leads at 15. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IPWR or VICR or MPWR or POWI or ON?
Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the more profitable company, earning 29.
1% net margin versus -280. 4% for Ideal Power Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPWR leads at 26. 1% versus -289. 8% for IPWR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MPWR leads at 55. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IPWR or VICR or MPWR or POWI or ON more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 10x versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 's 2. 48x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) trades at 34. 4x forward P/E versus 94. 3x for Vicor Corporation — 59. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for POWI: 10. 0% to $79. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — IPWR or VICR or MPWR or POWI or ON?
In this comparison, POWI (1.
2% yield), MPWR (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. IPWR, VICR, ON do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IPWR or VICR or MPWR or POWI or ON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ON Semiconductor Corporation (ON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1004% 10Y return).
Ideal Power Inc. (IPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ON: +1004%, IPWR: -90. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IPWR and VICR and MPWR and POWI and ON?
These companies operate in different sectors (IPWR (Industrials) and VICR (Technology) and MPWR (Technology) and POWI (Technology) and ON (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IPWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VICR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MPWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ON is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. POWI pays a dividend while IPWR, VICR, MPWR, ON do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.