IR
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$30.80B
5Y Perf.+178.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
IR vs FELE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FELE
Franklin Electric Co., Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$4.46B
5Y Perf.+99.1%
IR vs FELE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | IR | FELE |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $30.80B | $4.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.78B | $2.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $587M | $150M |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | 18.1% | 12.6% |
| Forward P/E | 22.4x | 22.0x |
| Total Debt | $4.78B | $280M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.25B | $100M |
IR vs FELE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
IR
FELE
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) | 100 | 278.9 | +178.9% |
| Franklin Electric C… (FELE) | 100 | 199.1 | +99.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IR vs FELE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: FELE leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Ingersoll Rand Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
IR
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
The Growth Play
IR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.7%, EPS growth -29.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.9%
- 305.0% 10Y total return vs FELE's 233.1%
- 5.7% revenue growth vs FELE's 5.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
FELE
Franklin Electric Co., Inc.
The Income Pick
FELE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 21.1%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.92, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.79x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | IR | 5.7% revenue growth vs FELE's 5.4% |
| Value | FELE | Lower P/E (22.0x vs 22.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | IR | 7.5% margin vs FELE's 6.9% |
| Stability / Safety | FELE | Beta 0.92 vs IR's 1.48, lower leverage |
| Dividends | FELE | 1.1% yield, 32-year raise streak, vs IR's 0.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | FELE | +17.9% vs IR's +3.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FELE | 7.6% ROA vs IR's 3.2%, ROIC 14.7% vs 7.8% |
IR vs FELE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
IR vs FELE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLFELELAGGINGIR
IRIngersoll Rand Inc.
2leads
FELEFranklin Electric Co.…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs IRMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
IR4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FELE5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
FELE8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
IR4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
FELE2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
FELE2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IR is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.8B annually — 3.6x FELE's $2.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.5% (IR) to 6.9% (FELE).
| Metric | IRIngersoll Rand In… | FELEFranklin Electric… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.8B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.9B | $322M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $587M | $150M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.2B | $169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.2% | +35.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +12.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.5% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +7.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.6% | +9.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.5% | +13.4% |
IR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FELE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 31.1x trailing earnings, FELE trades at a 43% valuation discount to IR's 54.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FELE's 14.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IR's 17.8x.
| Metric | IRIngersoll Rand In… | FELEFranklin Electric… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $30.8B | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $34.3B | $4.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 54.24x | 31.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.37x | 22.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.85x | 13.95x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.03x | 2.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.11x | 3.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 25.24x | 23.04x |
FELE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FELE leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FELE delivers a 11.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $6 for IR. FELE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IR's 0.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IR scores 6/9 vs FELE's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | IRIngersoll Rand In… | FELEFranklin Electric… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.8% | +11.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | +7.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.8% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.7% | +18.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.47x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.5B | $181M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $100M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.8B | $280M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.53x | 24.75x |
FELE leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IR five years ago would be worth $15,952 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,118 for FELE. Over the past 12 months, FELE leads with a +17.9% total return vs IR's +3.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IR at 10.2% vs FELE's 3.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | IRIngersoll Rand In… | FELEFranklin Electric… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.4% | +4.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.7% | +17.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.8% | +10.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.5% | +21.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +305.0% | +233.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.2% | +3.5% |
IR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FELE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FELE is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IR's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FELE currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs IR's 77.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | IRIngersoll Rand In… | FELEFranklin Electric… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $100.96 | $111.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $72.45 | $83.42 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.9% | +90.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.1 | 52.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 284K |
FELE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
FELE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates IR as "Buy" and FELE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 26.5% upside for IR (target: $100) vs -1.0% for FELE (target: $100). For income investors, FELE offers the higher dividend yield at 1.09% vs IR's 0.10%.
| Metric | IRIngersoll Rand In… | FELEFranklin Electric… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $99.50 | $100.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 32 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.08 | $1.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.3% | +3.7% |
FELE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
FELE leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). IR leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns).
Best OverallFranklin Electric Co., Inc. (FELE)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
IR vs FELE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IR or FELE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ingersoll Rand Inc.
(IR) is the stronger pick with 5. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. (FELE). Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. (FELE) offers the better valuation at 31. 1x trailing P/E (22. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IR or FELE?
On trailing P/E, Franklin Electric Co.
, Inc. (FELE) is the cheapest at 31. 1x versus Ingersoll Rand Inc. at 54. 2x. On forward P/E, Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IR or FELE?
Over the past 5 years, Ingersoll Rand Inc.
(IR) delivered a total return of +59. 5%, compared to +21. 2% for Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. (FELE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IR returned +305. 0% versus FELE's +233. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IR or FELE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Franklin Electric Co.
, Inc. (FELE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 92β versus Ingersoll Rand Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning IR is approximately 62% more volatile than FELE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. (FELE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 47% for Ingersoll Rand Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IR or FELE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ingersoll Rand Inc.
(IR) is pulling ahead at 5. 7% versus 5. 4% for Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. (FELE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. grew EPS -15. 8% year-over-year, compared to -29. 6% for Ingersoll Rand Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IR leads at 8. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IR or FELE?
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
(IR) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 6% net margin versus 6. 9% for Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IR leads at 18. 5% versus 12. 7% for FELE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IR leads at 38. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IR or FELE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Franklin Electric Co.
, Inc. (FELE) trades at 22. 0x forward P/E versus 22. 4x for Ingersoll Rand Inc. — 0. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IR: 26. 5% to $99. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — IR or FELE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. (FELE) offers the highest yield at 1. 1%, versus 0. 1% for Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR).
09Is IR or FELE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Franklin Electric Co.
, Inc. (FELE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), 1. 1% yield, +233. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FELE: +233. 1%, IR: +305. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IR and FELE?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
FELE pays a dividend while IR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(IR: 7.6% · FELE: 9.9%)Net Margin>
%
(IR: 7.5% · FELE: 6.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(IR: 54.2x · FELE: 31.1x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.