Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
IR vs PNR vs XYL vs ROP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
IR vs PNR vs XYL vs ROP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $30.35B | $12.76B | $27.49B | $36.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.78B | $4.20B | $9.09B | $8.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $587M | $671M | $973M | $1.71B |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | 40.9% | 38.6% | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 18.1% | 20.6% | 13.6% | 28.1% |
| Forward P/E | 22.0x | 14.8x | 20.9x | 16.1x |
| Total Debt | $4.78B | $1.64B | $1.94B | $9.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.25B | $102M | $1.48B | $297M |
IR vs PNR vs XYL vs ROP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) | 100 | 274.8 | +174.8% |
| Pentair plc (PNR) | 100 | 201.8 | +101.8% |
| Xylem Inc. (XYL) | 100 | 174.3 | +74.3% |
| Roper Technologies,… (ROP) | 100 | 89.5 | -10.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IR vs PNR vs XYL vs ROP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 299.5% 10Y total return vs XYL's 204.7%
- -0.4% vs ROP's -38.0%
PNR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and efficiency is your priority.
- Lower P/E (14.8x vs 22.0x)
- 9.9% ROA vs IR's 3.2%, ROIC 12.1% vs 7.8%
XYL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 1.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 16.5%, current ratio 1.63x
- PEG 0.91 vs ROP's 1.68
- Beta 0.92, yield 1.4%, current ratio 1.63x
ROP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.3%, EPS growth -1.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.7%
- 12.3% revenue growth vs PNR's 2.3%
- 21.1% margin vs IR's 7.5%
- Beta 0.43 vs IR's 1.48, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.3% revenue growth vs PNR's 2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.8x vs 22.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.1% margin vs IR's 7.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.43 vs IR's 1.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs ROP's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -0.4% vs ROP's -38.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.9% ROA vs IR's 3.2%, ROIC 12.1% vs 7.8% |
IR vs PNR vs XYL vs ROP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IR vs PNR vs XYL vs ROP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ROP leads in 2 of 6 categories
PNR leads 1 • IR leads 1 • XYL leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ROP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XYL is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.1B annually — 2.2x PNR's $4.2B. ROP is the more profitable business, keeping 21.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IR's 7.5%. On growth, ROP holds the edge at +11.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.8B | $4.2B | $9.1B | $8.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.9B | $983M | $1.8B | $3.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $587M | $671M | $973M | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.2B | $716M | $966M | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.2% | +40.9% | +38.6% | +69.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +20.6% | +13.6% | +28.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.5% | +16.0% | +10.7% | +21.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +17.0% | +10.6% | +31.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.6% | +2.6% | +2.7% | +11.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.5% | +12.9% | +14.5% | +59.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ROP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.9x trailing earnings, PNR trades at a 63% valuation discount to IR's 53.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), XYL offers better value at 1.29x vs ROP's 2.59x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $30.4B | $12.8B | $27.5B | $36.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33.9B | $14.3B | $27.9B | $45.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 53.45x | 19.94x | 29.50x | 24.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.05x | 14.75x | 20.91x | 16.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.52x | 1.29x | 2.59x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.61x | 14.66x | 15.54x | 14.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.97x | 3.06x | 3.04x | 4.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.06x | 3.38x | 2.40x | 1.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.88x | 17.11x | 30.21x | 14.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PNR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PNR delivers a 17.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $6 for IR. XYL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IR's 0.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PNR scores 8/9 vs ROP's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.8% | +17.7% | +8.5% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | +9.9% | +5.6% | +5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.8% | +12.1% | +7.6% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.7% | +15.0% | +8.5% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.47x | 0.42x | 0.17x | 0.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.5B | $1.5B | $463M | $9.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $102M | $1.5B | $297M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.8B | $1.6B | $1.9B | $9.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.53x | 11.94x | 49.32x | 6.50x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IR five years ago would be worth $15,409 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,255 for ROP. Over the past 12 months, IR leads with a -0.4% total return vs ROP's -38.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PNR at 11.8% vs ROP's -7.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.8% | -24.6% | -15.3% | -18.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -0.4% | -12.8% | -3.2% | -38.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.9% | +39.8% | +11.9% | -21.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54.1% | +23.0% | +2.6% | -17.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +299.5% | +126.9% | +204.7% | +115.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.7% | +11.8% | +3.8% | -7.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IR and ROP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ROP is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IR's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IR currently trades 76.8% from its 52-week high vs ROP's 60.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 1.22x | 0.92x | 0.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $100.96 | $113.95 | $154.27 | $584.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $72.45 | $77.02 | $114.15 | $313.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.8% | +69.3% | +75.0% | +60.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.3 | 35.3 | 45.4 | 43.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.1M | 1.6M | 2.1M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
XYL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IR as "Buy", PNR as "Hold", XYL as "Hold", ROP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 43.8% upside for PNR (target: $114) vs 28.4% for IR (target: $100). For income investors, XYL offers the higher dividend yield at 1.39% vs IR's 0.10%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $99.50 | $113.56 | $151.57 | $457.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 41 | 40 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +1.3% | +1.4% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 6 | 15 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.08 | $0.99 | $1.60 | $3.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.4% | +1.8% | +0.1% | +1.4% |
ROP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PNR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
IR vs PNR vs XYL vs ROP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IR or PNR or XYL or ROP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is the stronger pick with 12. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 3% for Pentair plc (PNR). Pentair plc (PNR) offers the better valuation at 19. 9x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IR or PNR or XYL or ROP?
On trailing P/E, Pentair plc (PNR) is the cheapest at 19.
9x versus Ingersoll Rand Inc. at 53. 4x. On forward P/E, Pentair plc is actually cheaper at 14. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Xylem Inc. wins at 0. 91x versus Roper Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 68x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IR or PNR or XYL or ROP?
Over the past 5 years, Ingersoll Rand Inc.
(IR) delivered a total return of +54. 1%, compared to -17. 5% for Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IR returned +299. 5% versus ROP's +115. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IR or PNR or XYL or ROP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 43β versus Ingersoll Rand Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning IR is approximately 247% more volatile than ROP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Xylem Inc. (XYL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 47% for Ingersoll Rand Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IR or PNR or XYL or ROP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is pulling ahead at 12. 3% versus 2. 3% for Pentair plc (PNR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xylem Inc. grew EPS 7. 4% year-over-year, compared to -29. 6% for Ingersoll Rand Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XYL leads at 17. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IR or PNR or XYL or ROP?
Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 4% net margin versus 7. 6% for Ingersoll Rand Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ROP leads at 28. 3% versus 13. 5% for XYL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ROP leads at 69. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IR or PNR or XYL or ROP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Xylem Inc. (XYL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 91x versus Roper Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 68x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Pentair plc (PNR) trades at 14. 8x forward P/E versus 22. 0x for Ingersoll Rand Inc. — 7. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PNR: 43. 8% to $113. 56.
08Which pays a better dividend — IR or PNR or XYL or ROP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Xylem Inc. (XYL) offers the highest yield at 1. 4%, versus 0. 1% for Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR).
09Is IR or PNR or XYL or ROP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 0. 9% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ROP: +115. 0%, IR: +299. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IR and PNR and XYL and ROP?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
PNR, XYL, ROP pay a dividend while IR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.