IR
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$30.80B
5Y Perf.+178.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
IR vs ROP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ROP
Roper Technologies, Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$36.05B
5Y Perf.-11.1%
IR vs ROP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | IR | ROP |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $30.80B | $36.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.78B | $8.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $587M | $1.71B |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 18.1% | 28.1% |
| Forward P/E | 22.4x | 16.0x |
| Total Debt | $4.78B | $9.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.25B | $297M |
IR vs ROP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
IR
ROP
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) | 100 | 278.9 | +178.9% |
| Roper Technologies,… (ROP) | 100 | 88.9 | -11.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IR vs ROP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ROP leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Ingersoll Rand Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
IR
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
IR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 305.0% 10Y total return vs ROP's 112.0%
- +3.7% vs ROP's -37.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
ROP
Roper Technologies, Inc.
The Income Pick
ROP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.43, yield 0.9%
- Rev growth 12.3%, EPS growth -1.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.43, Low D/E 46.8%, current ratio 0.52x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ROP | 12.3% revenue growth vs IR's 5.7% |
| Value | ROP | Lower P/E (16.0x vs 22.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | ROP | 21.1% margin vs IR's 7.5% |
| Stability / Safety | ROP | Beta 0.43 vs IR's 1.48, lower leverage |
| Dividends | ROP | 0.9% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs IR's 0.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | IR | +3.7% vs ROP's -37.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ROP | 5.0% ROA vs IR's 3.2%, ROIC 6.1% vs 7.8% |
IR vs ROP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
IR vs ROP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLROPLAGGINGIR
IRIngersoll Rand Inc.
1leads
ROPRoper Technologies, I…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs IRMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ROP6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
ROP5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
IR6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
ROP2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ROP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ROP and IR operate at a comparable scale, with $8.1B and $7.8B in trailing revenue. ROP is the more profitable business, keeping 21.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IR's 7.5%. On growth, ROP holds the edge at +11.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | IRIngersoll Rand In… | ROPRoper Technologie… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.8B | $8.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.9B | $3.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $587M | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.2B | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.2% | +69.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +28.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.5% | +21.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +31.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.6% | +11.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.5% | +59.1% |
ROP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
ROP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.7x trailing earnings, ROP trades at a 55% valuation discount to IR's 54.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ROP's 14.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IR's 17.8x.
| Metric | IRIngersoll Rand In… | ROPRoper Technologie… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $30.8B | $36.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $34.3B | $45.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 54.24x | 24.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.37x | 15.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.85x | 14.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.03x | 4.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.11x | 1.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 25.24x | 14.46x |
ROP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — IR and ROP each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ROP delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $6 for IR. ROP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IR's 0.47x.
| Metric | IRIngersoll Rand In… | ROPRoper Technologie… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.8% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | +5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.8% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.7% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.47x | 0.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.5B | $9.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $297M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.8B | $9.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.53x | 6.50x |
Evenly matched — IR and ROP each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IR five years ago would be worth $15,952 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,174 for ROP. Over the past 12 months, IR leads with a +3.7% total return vs ROP's -37.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IR at 10.2% vs ROP's -7.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | IRIngersoll Rand In… | ROPRoper Technologie… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.4% | -19.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.7% | -37.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.8% | -21.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.5% | -18.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +305.0% | +112.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.2% | -7.8% |
IR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IR and ROP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ROP is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IR's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IR currently trades 77.9% from its 52-week high vs ROP's 60.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | IRIngersoll Rand In… | ROPRoper Technologie… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 0.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $100.96 | $584.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $72.45 | $313.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.9% | +60.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.1 | 50.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 1.2M |
Evenly matched — IR and ROP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
ROP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates IR as "Buy" and ROP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.7% upside for ROP (target: $458) vs 26.5% for IR (target: $100). For income investors, ROP offers the higher dividend yield at 0.94% vs IR's 0.10%.
| Metric | IRIngersoll Rand In… | ROPRoper Technologie… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $99.50 | $457.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.08 | $3.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.3% | +1.4% |
ROP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
ROP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallRoper Technologies, Inc. (ROP)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
IR vs ROP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IR or ROP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is the stronger pick with 12. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 7% for Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR). Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) offers the better valuation at 24. 7x trailing P/E (16. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IR or ROP?
On trailing P/E, Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is the cheapest at 24. 7x versus Ingersoll Rand Inc. at 54. 2x. On forward P/E, Roper Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IR or ROP?
Over the past 5 years, Ingersoll Rand Inc.
(IR) delivered a total return of +59. 5%, compared to -18. 3% for Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IR returned +305. 0% versus ROP's +112. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IR or ROP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 43β versus Ingersoll Rand Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning IR is approximately 247% more volatile than ROP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 47% for Ingersoll Rand Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IR or ROP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is pulling ahead at 12. 3% versus 5. 7% for Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Roper Technologies, Inc. grew EPS -1. 0% year-over-year, compared to -29. 6% for Ingersoll Rand Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROP leads at 13. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IR or ROP?
Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 4% net margin versus 7. 6% for Ingersoll Rand Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ROP leads at 28. 3% versus 18. 5% for IR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ROP leads at 69. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IR or ROP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) trades at 16. 0x forward P/E versus 22. 4x for Ingersoll Rand Inc. — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ROP: 30. 7% to $457. 64.
08Which pays a better dividend — IR or ROP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) offers the highest yield at 0. 9%, versus 0. 1% for Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR).
09Is IR or ROP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Roper Technologies, Inc.
(ROP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 0. 9% yield, +112. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ROP: +112. 0%, IR: +305. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IR and ROP?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
ROP pays a dividend while IR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(IR: 7.6% · ROP: 11.3%)Net Margin>
%
(IR: 7.5% · ROP: 21.1%)P/E Ratio<
x
(IR: 54.2x · ROP: 24.7x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.