Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
IRS vs LOMA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction Materials
IRS vs LOMA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Construction Materials |
| Market Cap | $1.13B | $1.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $502.69B | $774.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $374.35B | $19.71B |
| Gross Margin | 61.2% | 21.8% |
| Operating Margin | 101.4% | 9.5% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 0.0x |
| Total Debt | $455.48B | $301.33B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $36.66B | $9.76B |
IRS vs LOMA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| IRSA Inversiones y … (IRS) | 100 | 449.4 | +349.4% |
| Loma Negra Compañía… (LOMA) | 100 | 239.9 | +139.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IRS vs LOMA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IRS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.30, yield 6.2%
- Rev growth 7.1%, EPS growth 48.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.0%
- 43.7% 10Y total return vs LOMA's -37.7%
LOMA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 41.3% revenue growth vs IRS's 7.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 41.3% revenue growth vs IRS's 7.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 74.5% margin vs LOMA's 2.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.30 vs LOMA's 1.50 | |
| Dividends | 6.2% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +11.6% vs LOMA's -0.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.2% ROA vs LOMA's 1.1%, ROIC 1.5% vs 6.2% |
IRS vs LOMA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IRS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOMA is the larger business by revenue, generating $774.3B annually — 1.5x IRS's $502.7B. IRS is the more profitable business, keeping 74.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LOMA's 2.5%. On growth, LOMA holds the edge at +6.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $502.7B | $774.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $520.2B | $118.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $374.4B | $19.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $289.8B | -$245M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.2% | +21.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +101.4% | +9.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +74.5% | +2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +57.6% | -0.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.9% | +6.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.8% | -71.9% |
Valuation Metrics
IRS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.1x trailing earnings, IRS trades at a 98% valuation discount to LOMA's 66.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LOMA's 10.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IRS's 47.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.10x | 66.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.01x | 0.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.01x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 47.21x | 10.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.21x | 1.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.26x | 1.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.61x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LOMA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IRS delivers a 25.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $2 for LOMA. LOMA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IRS's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LOMA scores 6/9 vs IRS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +25.5% | +2.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.2% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.5% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.6% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $418.8B | $291.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36.7B | $9.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $455.5B | $301.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.01x | 1.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IRS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IRS five years ago would be worth $47,054 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $22,072 for LOMA. Over the past 12 months, IRS leads with a +11.6% total return vs LOMA's -0.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IRS at 47.1% vs LOMA's 23.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.9% | -13.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.6% | -0.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +218.3% | +86.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +370.5% | +120.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.7% | -37.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +47.1% | +23.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IRS and LOMA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IRS is the less volatile stock with a 1.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LOMA's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.30x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.14 | $14.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.87 | $7.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.5% | +78.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.1 | 59.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 184K | 390K |
Analyst Outlook
IRS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates IRS as "Buy" and LOMA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -11.3% upside for IRS (target: $13) vs -26.9% for LOMA (target: $8). IRS is the only dividend payer here at 6.16% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.00 | $8.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.2% | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1253.80 | $0.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | 0.0% |
IRS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LOMA leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
IRS vs LOMA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IRS or LOMA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima (LOMA) is the stronger pick with 41.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 1% for IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS). IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) offers the better valuation at 1. 1x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IRS or LOMA?
On trailing P/E, IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) is the cheapest at 1.
1x versus Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima at 66. 3x. On forward P/E, IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima is actually cheaper at 0. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IRS or LOMA?
Over the past 5 years, IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) delivered a total return of +370.
5%, compared to +120. 7% for Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima (LOMA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IRS returned +43. 7% versus LOMA's -37. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IRS or LOMA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
30β versus Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima's 1. 50β — meaning LOMA is approximately 16% more volatile than IRS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima (LOMA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 37% for IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IRS or LOMA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima (LOMA) is pulling ahead at 41.
3% versus 7. 1% for IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima grew EPS 48. 2% year-over-year, compared to -96. 5% for Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima. Over a 3-year CAGR, IRS leads at 24. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IRS or LOMA?
IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
3% net margin versus 2. 8% for Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima — meaning it keeps 22. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LOMA leads at 9. 6% versus 6. 6% for IRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IRS leads at 60. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IRS or LOMA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) trades at 0.
0x forward P/E versus 0. 0x for Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima — 0. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IRS: -11. 3% to $13. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — IRS or LOMA?
In this comparison, IRS (6.
2% yield) pays a dividend. LOMA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IRS or LOMA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
30), 6. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IRS: +43. 7%, LOMA: -37. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IRS and LOMA?
These companies operate in different sectors (IRS (Industrials) and LOMA (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IRS is a small-cap deep-value stock; LOMA is a small-cap high-growth stock. IRS pays a dividend while LOMA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.