Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
IRS vs SPIR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
IRS vs SPIR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Specialty Business Services |
| Market Cap | $1.13B | $529.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $502.69B | $72M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $374.35B | $-25.02B |
| Gross Margin | 61.2% | 40.8% |
| Operating Margin | 101.4% | -121.4% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 10.0x |
| Total Debt | $455.48B | $8.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $36.66B | $24.81B |
IRS vs SPIR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| IRSA Inversiones y … (IRS) | 100 | 321.3 | +221.3% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 20.5 | -79.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IRS vs SPIR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IRS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.30, yield 6.2%
- Rev growth 7.1%, EPS growth 48.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.0%
- 43.7% 10Y total return vs SPIR's -78.8%
SPIR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +73.1% vs IRS's +11.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 10.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 74.5% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.30 vs SPIR's 2.93 | |
| Dividends | 6.2% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +73.1% vs IRS's +11.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.2% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 1.5% vs -0.1% |
IRS vs SPIR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IRS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IRS is the larger business by revenue, generating $502.7B annually — 7025.4x SPIR's $72M. IRS is the more profitable business, keeping 74.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, IRS holds the edge at +0.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $502.7B | $72M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $520.2B | -$74M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $374.4B | -$25.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $289.8B | -$16.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.2% | +40.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +101.4% | -121.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +74.5% | -349.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +57.6% | -227.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.9% | -26.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.8% | +59.5% |
Valuation Metrics
IRS leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.1x trailing earnings, IRS trades at a 89% valuation discount to SPIR's 10.0x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $529.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $513.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.10x | 10.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.01x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.01x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 47.21x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.21x | 7405.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.26x | 4.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.61x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
IRS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IRS delivers a 25.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. SPIR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IRS's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPIR scores 5/9 vs IRS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +25.5% | -88.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.2% | -47.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.5% | -0.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.6% | -0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $418.8B | -$16.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36.7B | $24.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $455.5B | $8.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.01x | 9.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IRS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IRS five years ago would be worth $47,054 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,035 for SPIR. Over the past 12 months, SPIR leads with a +73.1% total return vs IRS's +11.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IRS at 47.1% vs SPIR's 43.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.9% | +106.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.6% | +73.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +218.3% | +198.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +370.5% | -79.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.7% | -78.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +47.1% | +43.9% |
Risk & Volatility
IRS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IRS is the less volatile stock with a 1.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IRS currently trades 76.5% from its 52-week high vs SPIR's 68.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.30x | 2.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.14 | $23.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.87 | $6.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.5% | +68.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.1 | 55.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 184K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates IRS as "Buy" and SPIR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.0% upside for SPIR (target: $17) vs -11.3% for IRS (target: $13). IRS is the only dividend payer here at 6.16% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.00 | $17.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1253.80 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | 0.0% |
IRS leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
IRS vs SPIR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IRS or SPIR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) is the stronger pick with 7.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) offers the better valuation at 1. 1x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IRS or SPIR?
On trailing P/E, IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) is the cheapest at 1.
1x versus Spire Global, Inc. at 10. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IRS or SPIR?
Over the past 5 years, IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) delivered a total return of +370.
5%, compared to -79. 6% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IRS returned +43. 7% versus SPIR's -78. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IRS or SPIR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
30β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 126% more volatile than IRS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 37% for IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IRS or SPIR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) is pulling ahead at 7.
1% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima grew EPS 48. 2% year-over-year, compared to 137. 8% for Spire Global, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IRS leads at 24. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IRS or SPIR?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus 22. 3% for IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IRS leads at 6. 6% versus -121. 4% for SPIR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IRS leads at 60. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IRS or SPIR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPIR: 7.
0% to $17. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — IRS or SPIR?
In this comparison, IRS (6.
2% yield) pays a dividend. SPIR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IRS or SPIR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones Sociedad Anónima (IRS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
30), 6. 2% yield). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IRS: +43. 7%, SPIR: -78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IRS and SPIR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
IRS pays a dividend while SPIR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.