Security & Protection Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
IVDA vs SPIR vs ASTS vs VIOT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Communication Equipment
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
IVDA vs SPIR vs ASTS vs VIOT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Security & Protection Services | Specialty Business Services | Communication Equipment | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $1M | $529.86B | $19.12B | $102M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $72M | $71M | $2.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-25.02B | $-342M | $126M |
| Gross Margin | 18.9% | 40.8% | 53.4% | 25.8% |
| Operating Margin | -52.7% | -121.4% | -405.7% | 4.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.0x | — | 3.6x |
| Total Debt | $925K | $8.76B | $32M | $159M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $24.81B | $2.34B | $1.03B |
IVDA vs SPIR vs ASTS vs VIOT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iveda Solutions, In… (IVDA) | 100 | 1.8 | -98.2% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 20.5 | -79.5% |
| AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS) | 100 | 645.4 | +545.4% |
| Viomi Technology Co… (VIOT) | 100 | 17.5 | -82.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IVDA vs SPIR vs ASTS vs VIOT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IVDA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.48
SPIR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ASTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs SPIR's -78.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.82, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 16.35x
- 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
VIOT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 0.95, current ratio 2.07x
- Better valuation composite
- 5.0% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
- Beta 0.95 vs SPIR's 2.93
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.0% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs SPIR's 2.93 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +158.1% vs IVDA's -83.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs IVDA's -85.1%, ROIC 13.8% vs -277.7% |
IVDA vs SPIR vs ASTS vs VIOT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IVDA vs SPIR vs ASTS vs VIOT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VIOT leads in 2 of 6 categories
IVDA leads 2 • ASTS leads 1 • SPIR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VIOT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VIOT is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 352.5x IVDA's $7M. VIOT is the more profitable business, keeping 5.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $72M | $71M | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | -$74M | -$237M | $152M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$25.0B | -$342M | $126M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$16.2B | -$1.1B | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.9% | +40.8% | +53.4% | +25.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -52.7% | -121.4% | -4.1% | +4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -52.3% | -349.6% | -4.8% | +5.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -50.0% | -227.0% | -16.0% | +32.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.4% | -26.9% | +27.3% | +42.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.7% | +59.5% | -55.6% | +19.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IVDA leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, VIOT trades at a 68% valuation discount to SPIR's 10.0x P/E.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $529.9B | $19.1B | $102M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$689,910 | $513.8B | $16.8B | -$25M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.19x | 10.01x | -48.76x | 3.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 3.57x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | -0.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.17x | 7405.21x | 269.64x | 0.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.31x | 4.56x | 5.68x | 0.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 1.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VIOT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VIOT delivers a 8.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-3 for IVDA. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IVDA's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VIOT scores 7/9 vs IVDA's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.5% | -88.4% | -21.1% | +8.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -85.1% | -47.3% | -12.6% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.8% | -0.1% | -47.1% | +13.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -93.7% | -0.1% | -10.0% | +10.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.08x | 0.01x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | -$16.1B | -$2.3B | -$867M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $24.8B | $2.3B | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $925,220 | $8.8B | $32M | $159M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -105.57x | 9.20x | -21.20x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASTS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $78,824 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $80 for IVDA. Over the past 12 months, ASTS leads with a +158.1% total return vs IVDA's -83.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 134.8% vs IVDA's -67.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -59.9% | +106.4% | -21.7% | -42.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -83.7% | +73.1% | +158.1% | -17.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.4% | +198.1% | +1194.0% | +25.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | -79.6% | +688.2% | -84.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -78.8% | +568.8% | -86.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -67.1% | +43.9% | +134.8% | +8.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SPIR and VIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VIOT is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPIR currently trades 68.3% from its 52-week high vs IVDA's 12.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.48x | 2.93x | 2.82x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.70 | $23.59 | $129.89 | $4.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.22 | $6.60 | $22.47 | $0.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +12.9% | +68.3% | +50.3% | +22.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.8 | 55.5 | 41.8 | 41.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 576K | 1.6M | 14.9M | 267K |
Analyst Outlook
IVDA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPIR as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy", VIOT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.6% upside for ASTS (target: $104) vs 7.0% for SPIR (target: $17).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.25 | $103.65 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 7 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% |
VIOT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IVDA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
IVDA vs SPIR vs ASTS vs VIOT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IVDA or SPIR or ASTS or VIOT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Viomi Technology Co. , Ltd (VIOT) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (3. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IVDA or SPIR or ASTS or VIOT?
On trailing P/E, Viomi Technology Co.
, Ltd (VIOT) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Spire Global, Inc. at 10. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IVDA or SPIR or ASTS or VIOT?
Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) delivered a total return of +688. 2%, compared to -99. 2% for Iveda Solutions, Inc. (IVDA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +568. 8% versus IVDA's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IVDA or SPIR or ASTS or VIOT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Viomi Technology Co.
, Ltd (VIOT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 210% more volatile than VIOT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 37% for Iveda Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IVDA or SPIR or ASTS or VIOT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Viomi Technology Co. , Ltd grew EPS 273. 2% year-over-year, compared to 12. 6% for Iveda Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTS leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IVDA or SPIR or ASTS or VIOT?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -482. 2% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VIOT leads at 7. 4% versus -405. 7% for ASTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASTS leads at 53. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IVDA or SPIR or ASTS or VIOT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASTS: 58.
6% to $103. 65.
08Which pays a better dividend — IVDA or SPIR or ASTS or VIOT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is IVDA or SPIR or ASTS or VIOT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Viomi Technology Co.
, Ltd (VIOT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95)). Iveda Solutions, Inc. (IVDA) carries a higher beta of 2. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VIOT: -86. 5%, IVDA: -97. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IVDA and SPIR and ASTS and VIOT?
These companies operate in different sectors (IVDA (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and VIOT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IVDA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VIOT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.