Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
IVVD vs SABS vs REGN vs IMVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
IVVD vs SABS vs REGN vs IMVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $102M | $178M | $63.60B | $6.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $56M | $0.00 | $14.92B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-78M | $-398K | $4.42B | $-506M |
| Gross Margin | 92.0% | — | 84.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -146.4% | — | 24.3% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 13.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $6M | $2.71B | $72K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $227M | $11M | $3.12B | $902M |
IVVD vs SABS vs REGN vs IMVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Invivyd, Inc. (IVVD) | 100 | 2.3 | -97.7% |
| SAB Biotherapeutics… (SABS) | 100 | 3.3 | -96.7% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 90.9 | -9.1% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 388.2 | +288.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IVVD vs SABS vs REGN vs IMVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IVVD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 110.5%, EPS growth 79.0%
- 110.5% revenue growth vs SABS's -100.0%
SABS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 3.9%, current ratio 9.46x
- Beta 0.83, current ratio 9.46x
REGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.51, yield 0.6%
- 29.6% margin vs IVVD's -138.9%
- Beta 0.51 vs IVVD's 2.03
- 0.6% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 237.9% 10Y total return vs REGN's 68.2%
- +110.9% vs IVVD's -9.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 110.5% revenue growth vs SABS's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.6% margin vs IVVD's -138.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs IVVD's 2.03 | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.9% vs IVVD's -9.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.1% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2% |
IVVD vs SABS vs REGN vs IMVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
IVVD vs SABS vs REGN vs IMVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
REGN leads in 2 of 6 categories
IVVD leads 1 • IMVT leads 1 • SABS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REGN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REGN and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $14.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. REGN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IVVD's -138.9%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $56M | $0 | $14.9B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$80M | -$55M | $4.2B | -$532M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$78M | -$398,429 | $4.4B | -$506M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$79M | -$53M | $4.2B | -$407M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.0% | — | +84.5% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -146.4% | — | +24.3% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -138.9% | — | +29.6% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -142.2% | — | +27.9% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.6% | — | +19.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | +37.5% | -7.2% | -14.1% |
Valuation Metrics
IVVD leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $102M | $178M | $63.6B | $6.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$122M | $174M | $63.2B | $6.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.57x | -4.22x | 14.76x | -12.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 13.18x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.33x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 15.33x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.91x | — | 4.43x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.55x | 1.35x | 2.13x | 7.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 15.59x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
REGN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
REGN delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-68 for IMVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to REGN's 0.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), REGN scores 5/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -53.5% | -0.3% | +14.3% | -68.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.6% | -0.3% | +11.1% | -62.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.9% | -43.5% | +8.9% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -35.8% | -49.4% | +10.2% | -68.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.04x | 0.09x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$224M | -$5M | -$412M | -$902M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $227M | $11M | $3.1B | $902M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $6M | $2.7B | $72,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -5.80x | 108.44x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IMVT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $31,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $335 for SABS. Over the past 12 months, IMVT leads with a +110.9% total return vs IVVD's -9.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IMVT at 15.7% vs SABS's -28.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -69.2% | -11.7% | -20.9% | +29.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.1% | +82.0% | +18.0% | +110.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.8% | -63.2% | -18.1% | +55.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.3% | -96.6% | +16.8% | +213.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.3% | -96.7% | +68.2% | +237.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.0% | -28.3% | -6.4% | +15.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — REGN and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
REGN is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IVVD's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs IVVD's 25.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.03x | 0.83x | 0.51x | 1.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.07 | $6.60 | $821.11 | $36.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.48 | $1.60 | $503.25 | $14.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.1% | +50.5% | +74.6% | +92.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.0 | 42.7 | 37.5 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 626K | 868K | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IVVD as "Buy", SABS as "Buy", REGN as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1133.8% upside for IVVD (target: $10) vs 29.9% for IMVT (target: $44). REGN is the only dividend payer here at 0.56% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.50 | $9.33 | $836.00 | $43.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 7 | 48 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.41 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +6.2% | 0.0% |
REGN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IVVD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
IVVD vs SABS vs REGN vs IMVT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IVVD or SABS or REGN or IMVT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Invivyd, Inc.
(IVVD) is the stronger pick with 110. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for SAB Biotherapeutics, Inc. (SABS). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 14. 8x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Invivyd, Inc. (IVVD) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IVVD or SABS or REGN or IMVT?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +213. 0%, compared to -96. 6% for SAB Biotherapeutics, Inc. (SABS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +237. 9% versus SABS's -96. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IVVD or SABS or REGN or IMVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 51β versus Invivyd, Inc. 's 2. 03β — meaning IVVD is approximately 302% more volatile than REGN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 9% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — IVVD or SABS or REGN or IMVT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Invivyd, Inc.
(IVVD) is pulling ahead at 110. 5% versus -100. 0% for SAB Biotherapeutics, Inc. (SABS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Invivyd, Inc. grew EPS 79. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1. 5% for Immunovant, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IVVD or SABS or REGN or IMVT?
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -98. 2% for Invivyd, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REGN leads at 24. 9% versus -104. 0% for IVVD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IVVD leads at 93. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is IVVD or SABS or REGN or IMVT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IVVD: 1133.
8% to $9. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — IVVD or SABS or REGN or IMVT?
In this comparison, REGN (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. IVVD, SABS, IMVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is IVVD or SABS or REGN or IMVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 51), 0. 6% yield). Invivyd, Inc. (IVVD) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (REGN: +68. 2%, IVVD: -96. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between IVVD and SABS and REGN and IMVT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IVVD is a small-cap high-growth stock; SABS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. REGN pays a dividend while IVVD, SABS, IMVT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.