J vs PWR

For growth investors, Quanta Services, Inc.

(PWR) is the stronger pick with 19. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 6% for Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J). Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J) offers the better valuation at 51. 5x trailing P/E (17. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Jacobs Solutions Inc.

(J) is the cheapest at 51. 5x versus Quanta Services, Inc. at 110. 4x. On forward P/E, Jacobs Solutions Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 2x.

Over the past 5 years, Quanta Services, Inc.

(PWR) delivered a total return of +651. 1%, compared to -15. 1% for Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PWR returned +31. 4% versus J's -13. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jacobs Solutions Inc.

(J) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 22β versus Quanta Services, Inc. 's 1. 30β — meaning PWR is approximately 7% more volatile than J relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 58% for Jacobs Solutions Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Quanta Services, Inc.

(PWR) is pulling ahead at 19. 8% versus 4. 6% for Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Quanta Services, Inc. grew EPS 12. 8% year-over-year, compared to -62. 3% for Jacobs Solutions Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PWR leads at 18. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Quanta Services, Inc.

(PWR) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 6% net margin versus 2. 4% for Jacobs Solutions Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: J leads at 7. 2% versus 5. 8% for PWR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — J leads at 24. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Jacobs Solutions Inc.

(J) trades at 17. 2x forward P/E versus 57. 4x for Quanta Services, Inc. — 40. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for J: 26. 2% to $154. 86.

In this comparison, J (1.

0% yield) pays a dividend. PWR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Jacobs Solutions Inc.

(J) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 22), 1. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (J: -13. 4%, PWR: +31. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: J is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. J pays a dividend while PWR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.