J vs TTEK

For growth investors, Tetra Tech, Inc.

(TTEK) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 6% for Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J). Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK) offers the better valuation at 33. 0x trailing P/E (20. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Tetra Tech, Inc.

(TTEK) is the cheapest at 33. 0x versus Jacobs Solutions Inc. at 51. 5x. On forward P/E, Jacobs Solutions Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Tetra Tech, Inc.

(TTEK) delivered a total return of +28. 0%, compared to -15. 1% for Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTEK returned +450. 1% versus J's -13. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tetra Tech, Inc.

(TTEK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Jacobs Solutions Inc. 's 1. 22β — meaning J is approximately 128% more volatile than TTEK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 55% versus 58% for Jacobs Solutions Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tetra Tech, Inc.

(TTEK) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus 4. 6% for Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tetra Tech, Inc. grew EPS -24. 4% year-over-year, compared to -62. 3% for Jacobs Solutions Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTEK leads at 24. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Tetra Tech, Inc.

(TTEK) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 6% net margin versus 2. 4% for Jacobs Solutions Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TTEK leads at 11. 1% versus 7. 2% for J. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — J leads at 24. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Jacobs Solutions Inc.

(J) trades at 17. 2x forward P/E versus 20. 0x for Tetra Tech, Inc. — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTEK: 35. 2% to $41. 50.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J) offers the highest yield at 1. 0%, versus 0. 8% for Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Tetra Tech, Inc.

(TTEK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 0. 8% yield, +450. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTEK: +450. 1%, J: -13. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.