Leisure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
JAKK vs SPWH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
JAKK vs SPWH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $266M | $55M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $571M | $1.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $10M | $-37M |
| Gross Margin | 32.4% | 31.2% |
| Operating Margin | 2.5% | -1.3% |
| Forward P/E | 7.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $93M | $455M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $54M | $3M |
JAKK vs SPWH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK) | 100 | 388.0 | +288.0% |
| Sportsman's Warehou… (SPWH) | 100 | 12.7 | -87.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JAKK vs SPWH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JAKK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.79, yield 4.2%
- -66.6% 10Y total return vs SPWH's -87.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.79, Low D/E 37.3%, current ratio 1.82x
SPWH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -7.0%, EPS growth -13.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.4%
- -7.0% revenue growth vs JAKK's -17.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -7.0% revenue growth vs JAKK's -17.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.7% margin vs SPWH's -3.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.79 vs SPWH's 1.80, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +30.0% vs SPWH's -17.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.2% ROA vs SPWH's -3.9%, ROIC 4.1% vs -1.9% |
JAKK vs SPWH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
JAKK vs SPWH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JAKK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPWH is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 2.1x JAKK's $571M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.7% (JAKK) to -3.1% (SPWH). On growth, SPWH holds the edge at +1.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $571M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $24M | $24M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $10M | -$37M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | -$55M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.4% | +31.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | -1.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | -3.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | -4.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.8% | +1.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.4% | -12.5% |
Valuation Metrics
SPWH leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, JAKK's 12.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SPWH's 22.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $266M | $55M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $305M | $507M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.07x | -1.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.41x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.49x | 22.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.47x | 0.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.07x | 0.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JAKK leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JAKK delivers a 4.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-18 for SPWH. JAKK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SPWH's 1.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPWH scores 5/9 vs JAKK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.0% | -17.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | -3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.1% | -1.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.8% | -3.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 1.93x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $39M | $452M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $54M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $93M | $455M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 32.35x | -1.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JAKK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JAKK five years ago would be worth $26,151 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $800 for SPWH. Over the past 12 months, JAKK leads with a +30.0% total return vs SPWH's -17.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JAKK at 1.3% vs SPWH's -38.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +36.6% | -2.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.0% | -17.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.1% | -77.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +161.5% | -92.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.6% | -87.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.3% | -38.9% |
Risk & Volatility
JAKK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JAKK is the less volatile stock with a 1.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPWH's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JAKK currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs SPWH's 32.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.79x | 1.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.57 | $4.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.87 | $1.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.7% | +32.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.2 | 49.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 76K | 833K |
Analyst Outlook
JAKK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
JAKK is the only dividend payer here at 4.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $41.67 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.98 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | +0.6% |
JAKK leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SPWH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
JAKK vs SPWH: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JAKK or SPWH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.
(SPWH) is the stronger pick with -7. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 4% for JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK). JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK) offers the better valuation at 27. 1x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK) a "Hold" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — JAKK or SPWH?
Over the past 5 years, JAKKS Pacific, Inc.
(JAKK) delivered a total return of +161. 5%, compared to -92. 0% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. (SPWH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JAKK returned -66. 6% versus SPWH's -87. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — JAKK or SPWH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JAKKS Pacific, Inc.
(JAKK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 79β versus Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 80β — meaning SPWH is approximately 1% more volatile than JAKK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 193% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — JAKK or SPWH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.
(SPWH) is pulling ahead at -7. 0% versus -17. 4% for JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. grew EPS -13. 0% year-over-year, compared to -72. 6% for JAKKS Pacific, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPWH leads at -7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — JAKK or SPWH?
JAKKS Pacific, Inc.
(JAKK) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 7% net margin versus -2. 8% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JAKK leads at 2. 5% versus -1. 5% for SPWH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JAKK leads at 32. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — JAKK or SPWH?
In this comparison, JAKK (4.
2% yield) pays a dividend. SPWH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is JAKK or SPWH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JAKKS Pacific, Inc.
(JAKK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (4. 2% yield). Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. (SPWH) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JAKK: -66. 6%, SPWH: -87. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between JAKK and SPWH?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: JAKK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SPWH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JAKK pays a dividend while SPWH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.