Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
JBDI vs GLNG vs FLNG vs HKIT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Software - Application
JBDI vs GLNG vs FLNG vs HKIT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $11M | $5.75B | $1.74B | $427K |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9M | $394M | $348M | $9M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-977K | $66M | $75M | $-717K |
| Gross Margin | 67.7% | 46.9% | 52.9% | 14.9% |
| Operating Margin | -13.3% | 34.4% | 50.6% | -37.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 70.1x | 18.8x | 0.7x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $2.76B | $1.85B | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $190K | $1.18B | $448M | $4M |
JBDI vs GLNG vs FLNG vs HKIT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| JBDI Holdings Limit… (JBDI) | 100 | 5.0 | -95.0% |
| Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) | 100 | 167.3 | +67.3% |
| FLEX LNG Ltd. (FLNG) | 100 | 122.7 | +22.7% |
| Hitek Global Inc. (HKIT) | 100 | 0.8 | -99.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JBDI vs GLNG vs FLNG vs HKIT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JBDI plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
GLNG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 243.7% 10Y total return vs FLNG's 240.5%
FLNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 9.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, current ratio 3.03x
- Beta 0.15, yield 9.3%, current ratio 3.03x
- 21.5% margin vs JBDI's -10.4%
HKIT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 125.0%, EPS growth 132.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.6%
- 125.0% revenue growth vs JBDI's -15.5%
- Lower P/E (0.7x vs 18.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 125.0% revenue growth vs JBDI's -15.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.7x vs 18.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.5% margin vs JBDI's -10.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs HKIT's 0.70 | |
| Dividends | 9.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs GLNG's 5.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.0% vs HKIT's -98.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.9% ROA vs JBDI's -18.1%, ROIC 6.1% vs -34.0% |
JBDI vs GLNG vs FLNG vs HKIT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
JBDI vs GLNG vs FLNG vs HKIT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FLNG leads in 2 of 6 categories
GLNG leads 1 • JBDI leads 0 • HKIT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLNG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLNG is the larger business by revenue, generating $394M annually — 41.9x JBDI's $9M. FLNG is the more profitable business, keeping 21.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JBDI's -10.4%. On growth, HKIT holds the edge at +4.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9M | $394M | $348M | $9M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $185M | $252M | -$3M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $66M | $75M | -$716,547 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$430M | $133M | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.7% | +46.9% | +52.9% | +14.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.3% | +34.4% | +50.6% | -37.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.4% | +16.7% | +21.5% | -7.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | -109.2% | +38.4% | -23.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +101.5% | -3.7% | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.1% | -52.4% | +198.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — JBDI and FLNG and HKIT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.7x trailing earnings, HKIT trades at a 99% valuation discount to GLNG's 84.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FLNG's 12.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GLNG's 39.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11M | $5.8B | $1.7B | $426,774 |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13M | $7.3B | $3.1B | -$539,760 |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.74x | 84.66x | 23.36x | 0.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 70.12x | 18.80x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.42x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 39.69x | 12.46x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.22x | 14.62x | 5.02x | 0.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 29.89x | 2.70x | 2.42x | 0.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.49x | — | 12.93x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FLNG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLNG delivers a 10.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-103 for JBDI. HKIT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JBDI's 5.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GLNG scores 8/9 vs HKIT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -103.5% | +3.2% | +10.4% | -2.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.1% | +1.2% | +2.9% | -1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -34.0% | +2.9% | +6.1% | -4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -53.5% | +3.3% | +7.1% | -4.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.28x | 1.33x | 2.57x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $1.6B | $1.4B | -$966,534 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $190,000 | $1.2B | $448M | $4M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $2.8B | $1.8B | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -30.39x | 4.50x | 1.81x | -7.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GLNG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GLNG five years ago would be worth $50,681 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26 for HKIT. Over the past 12 months, FLNG leads with a +47.0% total return vs HKIT's -98.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GLNG at 39.9% vs HKIT's -86.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.2% | +45.7% | +33.7% | -99.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -36.3% | +43.7% | +47.0% | -98.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.3% | +173.7% | +27.6% | -99.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.3% | +406.8% | +293.5% | -99.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.3% | +243.7% | +240.5% | -99.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -61.4% | +39.9% | +8.4% | -86.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JBDI and FLNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JBDI is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HKIT's 0.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLNG currently trades 96.5% from its 52-week high vs HKIT's 0.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.06x | 0.24x | 0.12x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.00 | $57.29 | $33.40 | $209.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.52 | $35.02 | $21.72 | $0.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +19.3% | +96.1% | +96.5% | +0.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.8 | 56.3 | 57.0 | 22.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 2.1M | 617K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GLNG and FLNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GLNG as "Buy", FLNG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1.8% upside for GLNG (target: $56) vs -25.6% for FLNG (target: $24). For income investors, FLNG offers the higher dividend yield at 9.31% vs GLNG's 5.49%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $56.00 | $24.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 48 | 2 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.8% | +5.5% | +9.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.03 | $3.02 | $3.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FLNG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GLNG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
JBDI vs GLNG vs FLNG vs HKIT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JBDI or GLNG or FLNG or HKIT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hitek Global Inc.
(HKIT) is the stronger pick with 125. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 5% for JBDI Holdings Limited (JBDI). Hitek Global Inc. (HKIT) offers the better valuation at 0. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JBDI or GLNG or FLNG or HKIT?
On trailing P/E, Hitek Global Inc.
(HKIT) is the cheapest at 0. 7x versus Golar LNG Limited at 84. 7x. On forward P/E, FLEX LNG Ltd. is actually cheaper at 18. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JBDI or GLNG or FLNG or HKIT?
Over the past 5 years, Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) delivered a total return of +406.
8%, compared to -99. 7% for Hitek Global Inc. (HKIT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GLNG returned +247. 6% versus HKIT's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JBDI or GLNG or FLNG or HKIT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JBDI Holdings Limited (JBDI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
06β versus Hitek Global Inc. 's 0. 60β — meaning HKIT is approximately 966% more volatile than JBDI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hitek Global Inc. (HKIT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 5% for JBDI Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JBDI or GLNG or FLNG or HKIT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hitek Global Inc.
(HKIT) is pulling ahead at 125. 0% versus -15. 5% for JBDI Holdings Limited (JBDI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hitek Global Inc. grew EPS 132. 1% year-over-year, compared to -221. 4% for JBDI Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, GLNG leads at 13. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JBDI or GLNG or FLNG or HKIT?
FLEX LNG Ltd.
(FLNG) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 5% net margin versus -10. 4% for JBDI Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 21. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLNG leads at 50. 6% versus -27. 4% for HKIT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JBDI leads at 67. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JBDI or GLNG or FLNG or HKIT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, FLEX LNG Ltd.
(FLNG) trades at 18. 8x forward P/E versus 70. 1x for Golar LNG Limited — 51. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GLNG: 1. 8% to $56. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — JBDI or GLNG or FLNG or HKIT?
In this comparison, FLNG (9.
3% yield), JBDI (5. 8% yield), GLNG (5. 5% yield) pay a dividend. HKIT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JBDI or GLNG or FLNG or HKIT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FLEX LNG Ltd.
(FLNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 9. 3% yield, +243. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLNG: +243. 9%, HKIT: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JBDI and GLNG and FLNG and HKIT?
These companies operate in different sectors (JBDI (Consumer Cyclical) and GLNG (Energy) and FLNG (Energy) and HKIT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JBDI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GLNG is a small-cap high-growth stock; FLNG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HKIT is a small-cap high-growth stock. JBDI, GLNG, FLNG pay a dividend while HKIT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.