Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
JBDI vs HKIT vs CLPS vs CNET vs BTBT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Information Technology Services
Advertising Agencies
Financial - Capital Markets
JBDI vs HKIT vs CLPS vs CNET vs BTBT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Software - Application | Information Technology Services | Advertising Agencies | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $11M | $427K | $25M | $2M | $589M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9M | $9M | $299M | $6M | $164M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-977K | $-717K | $-4M | $-2M | $137M |
| Gross Margin | 67.7% | 14.9% | 22.8% | 4.8% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | -13.3% | -37.5% | -1.4% | -31.7% | 16.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 0.7x | — | — | 9.2x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $3M | $34M | $122K | $14M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $190K | $4M | $28M | $812K | $95M |
JBDI vs HKIT vs CLPS vs CNET vs BTBT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| JBDI Holdings Limit… (JBDI) | 100 | 4.7 | -95.3% |
| Hitek Global Inc. (HKIT) | 100 | 0.9 | -99.1% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 73.1 | -26.9% |
| ZW Data Action Tech… (CNET) | 100 | 27.8 | -72.2% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 56.8 | -43.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JBDI vs HKIT vs CLPS vs CNET vs BTBT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JBDI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HKIT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.70, Low D/E 7.3%, current ratio 8.23x
- Lower P/E (0.7x vs 9.2x)
CLPS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
- Beta 0.27, yield 14.6%, current ratio 1.58x
- Beta 0.27 vs BTBT's 3.37
- 14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs JBDI's 5.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, CNET doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BTBT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
- -60.4% 10Y total return vs CLPS's -78.5%
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CNET's -49.5%
- 17.3% margin vs CNET's -33.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CNET's -49.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.7x vs 9.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs CNET's -33.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs BTBT's 3.37 | |
| Dividends | 14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs JBDI's 5.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -5.4% vs HKIT's -98.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.0% ROA vs CNET's -21.3%, ROIC 6.5% vs -64.7% |
JBDI vs HKIT vs CLPS vs CNET vs BTBT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
JBDI vs HKIT vs CLPS vs CNET vs BTBT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories
CLPS leads 2 • HKIT leads 1 • JBDI leads 0 • CNET leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $299M annually — 48.5x CNET's $6M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNET's -33.4%. On growth, HKIT holds the edge at +4.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9M | $9M | $299M | $6M | $164M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$3M | -$1M | -$2M | $166M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$716,547 | -$4M | -$2M | $137M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$2M | $0 | -$2M | -$448M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.7% | +14.9% | +22.8% | +4.8% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.3% | -37.5% | -1.4% | -31.7% | +16.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.4% | -7.6% | -1.3% | -33.4% | +17.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | -23.8% | -2.3% | -27.3% | -65.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.4% | +15.3% | -47.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +198.4% | +75.8% | +95.7% | +2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
HKIT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.7x trailing earnings, HKIT trades at a 92% valuation discount to BTBT's 9.2x P/E.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11M | $426,774 | $25M | $2M | $589M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13M | -$539,760 | $31M | $1M | $508M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.74x | 0.73x | -3.48x | -0.38x | 9.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 8.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.22x | 0.07x | 0.15x | 0.12x | 3.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 29.89x | 0.00x | 0.43x | 0.38x | 0.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.49x | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-103 for JBDI. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JBDI's 5.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -103.5% | -2.1% | -6.1% | -60.3% | +21.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.1% | -1.7% | -3.2% | -21.3% | +19.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -34.0% | -4.1% | -7.9% | -64.7% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -53.5% | -4.7% | -9.8% | -73.5% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.28x | 0.07x | 0.59x | 0.03x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$966,534 | $6M | -$690,000 | -$81M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $190,000 | $4M | $28M | $812,000 | $95M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $3M | $34M | $122,000 | $14M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -30.39x | -7.64x | — | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLPS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLPS five years ago would be worth $3,073 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26 for HKIT. Over the past 12 months, CLPS leads with a -5.4% total return vs HKIT's -98.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLPS at 0.2% vs HKIT's -86.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.2% | -99.4% | -10.3% | -44.4% | -10.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -36.3% | -98.8% | -5.4% | -55.1% | -9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.3% | -99.8% | +0.5% | -89.0% | -19.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.3% | -99.7% | -69.3% | -97.9% | -84.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.3% | -99.7% | -78.5% | -97.8% | -60.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -61.4% | -86.8% | +0.2% | -52.1% | -7.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JBDI and CLPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JBDI is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLPS currently trades 48.2% from its 52-week high vs HKIT's 0.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.02x | 0.70x | 0.27x | 1.18x | 3.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.00 | $209.00 | $1.88 | $2.78 | $4.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.52 | $0.67 | $0.80 | $0.57 | $1.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +19.3% | +0.3% | +48.2% | +25.2% | +40.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.8 | 22.0 | 49.8 | 50.7 | 69.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 1.1M | 15K | 11K | 18.5M |
Analyst Outlook
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, CLPS offers the higher dividend yield at 14.60% vs BTBT's 0.31%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.8% | — | +14.6% | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.03 | — | $0.13 | — | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CLPS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
JBDI vs HKIT vs CLPS vs CNET vs BTBT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JBDI or HKIT or CLPS or CNET or BTBT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). Hitek Global Inc. (HKIT) offers the better valuation at 0. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JBDI or HKIT or CLPS or CNET or BTBT?
On trailing P/E, Hitek Global Inc.
(HKIT) is the cheapest at 0. 7x versus Bit Digital, Inc. at 9. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JBDI or HKIT or CLPS or CNET or BTBT?
Over the past 5 years, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) delivered a total return of -69.
3%, compared to -99. 7% for Hitek Global Inc. (HKIT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BTBT returned -60. 4% versus HKIT's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JBDI or HKIT or CLPS or CNET or BTBT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JBDI Holdings Limited (JBDI) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
02β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately -16461% more volatile than JBDI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 5% for JBDI Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JBDI or HKIT or CLPS or CNET or BTBT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -221. 4% for JBDI Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLPS leads at 2. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JBDI or HKIT or CLPS or CNET or BTBT?
Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -24. 4% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -27. 4% for HKIT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JBDI leads at 67. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — JBDI or HKIT or CLPS or CNET or BTBT?
In this comparison, CLPS (14.
6% yield), JBDI (5. 8% yield), BTBT (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. HKIT, CNET do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is JBDI or HKIT or CLPS or CNET or BTBT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JBDI Holdings Limited (JBDI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
02), 5. 8% yield). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JBDI: -94. 3%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between JBDI and HKIT and CLPS and CNET and BTBT?
These companies operate in different sectors (JBDI (Consumer Cyclical) and HKIT (Technology) and CLPS (Technology) and CNET (Communication Services) and BTBT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JBDI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HKIT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CNET is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock. JBDI, CLPS pay a dividend while HKIT, CNET, BTBT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.